Mike Smalling
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2018
- Messages
- 13,912
Exactly.Header vs Donnarumma ?
Exactly.Header vs Donnarumma ?
Yeah, that loan was absolutely crucial to his development.
No we need him cutting in from the wing - I feel a lot of that playmaking would be lost if he were shunted up topWould people consider him playing as a 9?
If Rashford and Garnacho get their act together and play on their respective wings would Amad be a good 9 instead of Rashford?
I think he has more ability than Hojlund, albeit I hope Hojlund comes good. Basically Amad, for such a tiny guy, protects the ball better than Rasmus, defenders can't get it off him, has pace and can dribble past players and certainly has an eye for goal. Even his headed attempt, for such a small guy, was better than what I have seen from Rasmus or Rashford as 9.
Most importantly he makes runs and gets into positions which I don't see from Rasmus and Rashy.
I appreciate long term he should be a 10 and I have hopes Rasmus will come good but right now we need a goal scorer and this guy certainly has that. Thoughts?
I wonder how important the loans at Rangers and Sunderland were for his development?
He's fantastic.
Would people consider him playing as a 9?
If Rashford and Garnacho get their act together and play on their respective wings would Amad be a good 9 instead of Rashford?
I think he has more ability than Hojlund, albeit I hope Hojlund comes good. Basically Amad, for such a tiny guy, protects the ball better than Rasmus, defenders can't get it off him, has pace and can dribble past players and certainly has an eye for goal. Even his headed attempt, for such a small guy, was better than what I have seen from Rasmus or Rashford as 9.
Most importantly he makes runs and gets into positions which I don't see from Rasmus and Rashy.
I appreciate long term he should be a 10 and I have hopes Rasmus will come good but right now we need a goal scorer and this guy certainly has that. Thoughts?
100%. An elite talent that we should have began to bed into the first team the minute he entered the door.
Instead he barely played his first year and a half spending lots of time in the u21s, got sent on 2 unceccesary loans then had a season that was a complete write off in terms of development as he barely got a chance.
It's a testament to his attitude that despite being completely mismanaged for the better part of 4 seasons by the club, he still put his head down and worked.
No mate, he'd be wasted as a 9.
It’s not that weird. OGS basically didn’t bother with him the entire time he was here despite some encouraging early signs. Then we sent him to Rangers (horrid choice to develop a high technical teenager, and the manager didn’t really give a feck about him). So that sort of ended up being a waste of a year and a half before he went to Sunderland in 22/23 (which was ideal and absolutely aided his development). He comes back, gets hurt in the summer, then is fully fit by December but has a manager that largely hates him and refused to play him any sort of consistent minutes.That’s such a weird take. He’s the player he is now because of the development opportunities he’s had until now (including those loans)
He’s the player we all thought Sancho would be.
Sancho is tailor made for the left side 10
role incidentally, although that ship has obviously sailed. But I am confident that under a good coach in a performing side, he would very easily be our best option in that position if he were still here.
Technically I agree, Sancho's limitations with driving past his man would be less apparent in an inside role and his linkup around the box is class. Don't know if his physical limitations/workrate and cowardliness in challenges would've worked for Amorim. But to be fair, Sancho has been working harder in the recent Chelsea matches I've seen, the git. Either way he's far more suited to the role than Garnacho and Rashford and maybe we'll be wondering what could have been. Just never warmed to his personality and don't appreciate the way he acted towards the club.Sancho is tailor made for the left side 10
role incidentally, although that ship has obviously sailed. But I am confident that under a good coach in a performing side, he would very easily be our best option in that position if he were still here.
We will waste his assets such as his passing and dribbling and also his creativity if we play him as a 9.Would people consider him playing as a 9?
If Rashford and Garnacho get their act together and play on their respective wings would Amad be a good 9 instead of Rashford?
I think he has more ability than Hojlund, albeit I hope Hojlund comes good. Basically Amad, for such a tiny guy, protects the ball better than Rasmus, defenders can't get it off him, has pace and can dribble past players and certainly has an eye for goal. Even his headed attempt, for such a small guy, was better than what I have seen from Rasmus or Rashford as 9.
Most importantly he makes runs and gets into positions which I don't see from Rasmus and Rashy.
I appreciate long term he should be a 10 and I have hopes Rasmus will come good but right now we need a goal scorer and this guy certainly has that. Thoughts?
We will waste his assets such as his passing and dribbling and also his creativity if we play him as a 9.
And the ability to move with the ball in tight spacesWe will waste his assets such as his passing and dribbling and also his creativity if we play him as a 9.
I'm very happy to see Amad coming along nicely because his talent was always obvious to me and it required some patience from the club and coaching staff to develop his game.Same here. Those of us who know, know.
Look, Hannibal is not pulling trees at Burnley and still plays like he's 18 (or has actually regressed) but the boy had unreal talent and I feel with he would have developed so much differently in different circumstances.
Him and Amad had attributes we were sorely lacking in the first team but EtH mismanaged both horribly and Hannibal has unfortunately not recovered.
It's scary how much a manager can derail a player and I'm so happy for Amad that he's come through that nonsense - Forson, Mazraoui, all of that, it made absolutely no sense.
Where is @Adnan?? Must be so pleased
No, but he’d still be here if he spent the Antony/Mount money on Caicedo and Kudus or something. And then had Amad as the RWWould Ten Hag still be here if he played him?
That’s such a weird take. He’s the player he is now because of the development opportunities he’s had until now (including those loans)
It's the faces of the veterans that makes it, they love the kid. Beautiful.MEDIA
Lovely chant