Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
Sorry, I should have been clearer. I wasn’t seriously suggesting this would be a good or realistic idea. Just that it would be technically possible, if we wanted to be utter cnuts about it.

No worries mate. Honestly I thought of that option myself. However, it wouldn't really work. First of all the ECJ had made it clear that revocation of article 50 will need to be done in good faith + in line of the country's constitution. If the UK play dirty then the EU will wiggle out of it through either the former or through the latter (the UK has no constitution). Secondly what would happen is that the UK would piss off everybody which means that the UK risks to be punished under Article 7. Finally businesses would be absolutely terrified by the UK threatening an entire continent. If the UK can put a gun at Europe's head then imagine what they can do to them.
 
Good news that come with Brexit:
- Portugal airports are considering to hire a lot of people for visa checking. A Visa in Portugal costs 60 to 95€ and local authorities expect to make about 20M€ in Visas fees during a year if UK tourist flux remians the same.

You guys are going to pay more for a Visa than for a Ryanair flight when travelling to Algarve :lol:

Do you know how this would affect someone like myself?

I have a property in Portugal, Portuguese bank account, fiscal no etc but no citizenship as the property isn't worth over 500,000 euros.

If this god forbid does happen, do I pay the same tourist visa charge or are there concessions/exclusions for a property owner.
 
I am pleased that you are feeling so positive.
This sort of snarky comment is part of the problem I have with Leave voters. No solutions, just an incredibly naive and/or arrogant opinion of "oh we'll be fine, get on with it".

Utterly useless drivel.
 
Like a game of pass the bomb between Labour and Conservatives now.

The bomb being No Deal or No Brexit. Be the one holding the bomb when it goes off and that's you and party done for.

Corbyn quite content to leave the Conservatives holding the bomb knowing it plays into his 'look at what the Conservative-elite have done now'.

Conservatives going in hard on Corbyn and Co's socialist-vision in order to paint them as Brexit saboteurs. The invite to cross-party talks is essentially an invite to help diffuse the bomb, all whilst knowing that if it does go off, both parties are badly wounded.
 
That’s not quite right, as I understand it.

Long term budgets have to pass the EU Council unianimaously. In fact, Cameron once threatened to veto the budget: https://www.google.co.uk/amp/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUKBRE89604720121007

It set off thinking in the EU about how to operate on annual budgets, which can be passed on qualified majorities, even if very far from ideal from a practical point of view. https://www.euractiv.com/section/eu...ys-to-bypass-britain-s-eu-budget-veto-threat/

There are no vetoes on the budget, the only time where unanimity is needed is regarding the adoption of its legal framework but even then:

Paragraph 4, Art.312 of the TFEU:

4. Where no Council regulation determining a new financial framework has been adopted by the end of the previous financial framework, the ceilings and other provisions corresponding to the last year of that framework shall be extended until such time as that act is adopted.

Then on the actual budget:

Art.314 of the TFEU
The Conciliation Committee, which shall be composed of the members of the Council or their representatives and an equal number of members representing the European Parliament, shall have the task of reaching agreement on a joint text, by a qualified majority of the members of the Council or their representatives and by a majority of the representatives of the European Parliament within twenty-one days of its being convened, on the basis of the positions of the European Parliament and the Council.

Art.315 of the TFEU - Failure to adopt the budget

If, at the beginning of a financial year, the budget has not yet been definitively adopted, a sum equivalent to not more than one twelfth of the budget appropriations for the preceding financial year may be spent each month in respect of any chapter of the budget in accordance with the provisions of the Regulations made pursuant to Article 322; that sum shall not, however, exceed one twelfth of the appropriations provided for in the same chapter of the draft budget.

The Council on a proposal by the Commission, may, provided that the other conditions laid down in the first paragraph are observed, authorise expenditure in excess of one twelfth in accordance with the regulations made pursuant to Article 322. The Council shall forward the decision immediately to the European Parliament.

The decision referred to in the second paragraph shall lay down the necessary measures relating to resources to ensure application of this Article, in accordance with the acts referred to in Article 311.

It shall enter into force thirty days following its adoption if the European Parliament, acting by a majority of its component Members, has not decided to reduce this expenditure within that time-limit.
 
Corbyn is a chancer who talks a good game, but that is all. He is in this for himself and bugger the people.

I think the bloke is a bit of moron and I definitely won't be voting for him but self-interested is one thing I'd never describe him as.
 
There are no vetoes on the budget, the only time where unanimity is needed is regarding the adoption of its legal framework but even then:

Paragraph 4, Art.312 of the TFEU:



Then on the actual budget:

Art.314 of the TFEU


Art.315 of the TFEU - Failure to adopt the budget
I presume it was the financial framework that Cameron threatened to veto and got everyone in a panic then.
 
Good news that come with Brexit:
- Portugal airports are considering to hire a lot of people for visa checking. A Visa in Portugal costs 60 to 95€ and local authorities expect to make about 20M€ in Visas fees during a year if UK tourist flux remians the same.

You guys are going to pay more for a Visa than for a Ryanair flight when travelling to Algarve :lol:
I am a bit lost with this subject. Will they need a visa to go on holidays to Schengen countries? I don't think It's a good idea.
I mean,the rule Will be with EU or every country can establish conditions with UK?
 
Corbyn is clearly engineering the situation so he can sit on his hands as much as possible whilst appearing to take a principled stance.

Thinks he’s some kind of master Machiavellian by trying to make a weak PM look even weaker with the aim of getting his hands on those levers of power.

No doubt he’ll be getting his fiddle out when the UK goes up in flames as he thinks May & the Tories will take all the flak thus benefitting Labour.

Well, culpable as the Tories are (and by god they are culpable) so too will Jeremy Corbyn be culpable for contributing feck all to the situation when asked.

Unbelievable that a man who has spoken in the past to some dubious organisations won’t cross the hall go and talk with the PM.

Hopefully the likes of Hilary Benn & Yvette Cooper ignore the Labour leadership and engage.

Clement Attlee will be turning in his grave.

Fecking hell, imagine if we had been stuck with May & Corbyn when we stood alone in 1940? Doesn’t bear thinking about does it?
 
The intention is to try to get cross party consensus using a series of indicative votes in order to more clearly identify what could and could not be acceptable.

The intention is for May to get her deal accepted wuthour delaying exit, revoking A50 or having another referendum. She is offering nothing meaningful to discuss.
 
Thinks he’s some kind of master Machiavellian by trying to make a weak PM look even weaker with the aim of getting his hands on those levers of power.

No doubt he’ll be getting his fiddle out when the UK goes up in flames as he thinks May & the Tories will take all the flak thus benefitting Labour.

Well, culpable as the Tories are (and by god they are culpable) so too will Jeremy Corbyn be culpable for contributing feck all to the situation when asked.

Unbelievable that a man who has spoken in the past to some dubious organisations won’t cross the hall go and talk with the PM.

Hopefully the likes of Hilary Benn & Yvette Cooper ignore the Labour leadership and engage.

Clement Attlee will be turning in his grave.

Fecking hell, imagine if we had been stuck with May & Corbyn when we stood alone in 1940? Doesn’t bear thinking about does it?[/QUOTE]

I can't stand Corbyn. I'm almost as mad at Labour as I am the Conservatives, just like the Americans should be mad at the Democrats.

You have one job, provide an proper alternative to the shite on display, and you feck it up.
 
Yep, we could veto long term budgets, but annual budgets can be passed with a qualified majority.

If we were playing hardball with the EU the approach now would be:
1. Formally revoke A50
2. State publicly that we consider May’s deal to be the opening Brexit offer and need for renegotiation
3. The EU will state that the deal cannot be renogtiated, and certainly not without A50 being triggered
4. We generally cause mayhem inside the EU, vetoing budgets and such, until they agree to renegotiate the deal, ahead of us retriggering A50 without the 2 year no-deal deadline gun to our head.

It would probably all end up back at the ECJ, who would side with the rest of the EU that Britain is behaving unlawfully. Or the rest of the EU would gang up to pass legislation that screws Britain, for example in the financial sector.

In what world do you live in?

Do you think the EU will sit armcrossed saying: " those pesky brittish got us caught by the balls"?

Try that and I assure you you would get kicked out, (with an existing rule or making a new one), blocked by any future trade and not making it easy on your geographical proximities.

Only a rule britannia imperialistic grandieur nostalgic moron would do something like this expecting to get away with it
 
Great to see people are coming around to seeing Corbyn for who he is. Enjoyed reading this page :drool:

It's just the usual bunch, so many having a hard time with the tories fecking up so badly they have to lash out and pretend there's even a trace of blame with Corbyn :lol:

Hard time to be a tory remainer
 
I voted Labour and depending on their position in a next GE, I may well vote for them again even with Corbyn in charge. While I think Corbyn should engage with May (despite thinking May only now opening up things to other parties 2 months before we are due to leave is poor), currently and for a while I think Labour are in a tricky position. What can they do? What should they do?

This situation is so messy maybe in the long term it's best for Labour to be hands off. Ultimately, in 10 years time after we leave no one is going to be saying ahh the Labour opposition were terrible in the Brexit fiasco, it will be pinned on May and the Tories. Just as people (as misinformed as I think it is) blame Labour and not a weak opposition for the impact of the financial crisis in the UK.
 
It's just the usual bunch, so many having a hard time with the tories fecking up so badly they have to lash out and pretend there's even a trace of blame with Corbyn :lol:

Hard time to be a tory remainer

You think people who aren't Tories (say, everyone who isn't from the UK) have a positive view of Labour's handling of Brexit under Corbyn?
 
You think people who aren't Tories (say, everyone who isn't from the UK) have a positive view of Labour's handling of Brexit under Corbyn?

No of course not there's plenty of criticism to share around. Just the more right leaning posters on here jumped in over the last couple of days and their blame tends to go in one direction.

I don't think I'll be voting Corbyn next time round as he's been lacklustre but Labours position is complex. Split electorate, split MPs and no place at the negotiating table and that's before you get to the DUP and May. It's not simple like some political geniuses like to pretend.
 
I'd never even heard of him until Brexit caught my attention, it's been pretty obvious how poor he is from day one. The nothing man.

Corbyn was one of the biggest critics of the EU and a follower of Tony Benn. He's the last of the true Labour socialists leading an army of Blairites against everything he truly believes in in order to fulfil a career ambition of being prime minister.
 
Corbyn was one of the biggest critics of the EU and a follower of Tony Benn. He's the last of the true Labour socialists leading an army of Blairites against everything he truly believes in in order to fulfil a career ambition of being prime minister.

He reminds me of the Labour anti- EEC lot back in the early 70s.
I remember at the beginning of Brexit thinking why isn't that Labour Leader saying anything of substance - and he still hasn't three years later.
 
Too many to mention. But are you of the opinion that the remain side was lily white.

You've been asked several times to name some, but you keep refusing.

Corbyn was one of the biggest critics of the EU and a follower of Tony Benn. He's the last of the true Labour socialists leading an army of Blairites against everything he truly believes in in order to fulfil a career ambition of being prime minister.

Can you elaborate a little on this for me?
 
I'd never even heard of him until Brexit caught my attention, it's been pretty obvious how poor he is from day one. The nothing man.

I'm sure Corbyn will get on well with Jean Luc Mélenchon when they're both likely in office in 2022. That could be a different kind of entente.
 
I'm sure Corbyn will get on well with Jean Luc Mélenchon when they're both likely in office in 2022. That could be a different kind of entente.

The man wasn't popular before and is even less popular now, so it's far from likely that he is even candidate.
 
You think people who aren't Tories (say, everyone who isn't from the UK) have a positive view of Labour's handling of Brexit under Corbyn?
I'm not from the UK and I don't think he has done well. This is mostly because his stance that everything will become great when he takes over negotiations is a trump like proposal which shouldnt convince anyone. He's treating the situation with the EU like it's a game of chess and he's simply the better player than May. The deal is on the table and there's no way that he'll get a more rosy version and some ideas spouted by some of his followers like the "The EU is scared of a socialist Britain hence why we would get a better deal" are just laughable.

Having said that, Labours position is simply horrible and no one has yet to offer a clear way that they should've picked. In my opinion they should've strongly pushed for a Customs Union deal position from the beginning with an option of a 2nd referendum specifying what "the public wants" (god that sounds dumb). I think with a homogenous party position and proper narrative setting that could've been a genuine way out for them. But that's easier said than done in hindsight. Now, they're in a shit position, everything he would do right now would piss off a lot of people.
And he's additionally not being helped with all the ludicrous shit that's being thrown at him, in the media and elsewhere. You just have to look through the last few pages to see the pathetic "Can't be trusted with the economy" "Terrorist supporter" agenda.

Maybe the tory supporter in here who spout those "Any other opposition would be miles ahead" nonsense should take a deep look at the party they've supported for decades. If it weren't for his referendum call, Paul the Wolf, Sassy Collins, Honest John and whatever they're all named would glorify a leader like Cameron yet he and his party are ten times more responsible for this mess than Labour and that is not because of the referendum call itself but because they've pushed their "business friendly, lets turn the UK into a tax heaven while pushing austerity" agenda for years, feeding the public continuously with fears of immigration and consolidating the beliefs of little Englanders that the Great British Empire deserves something better than the EU.
Yet Corbyn is solely responsible because he doesn't want to join a half arsed talk with May who ignored all the other parties for the last two years and now desperately tries to play the bipartisan card.
 
Have you seen the James O'Brien vs Jacob Rees Mogg debate?



I think James was great in it, not quite as he was against Farage but he was still able to expose JRM for the fraud he is


By god has anyone read the Youtube comments on that video? Ater reading a few of them I was starting to question who pasted who in that debate. :eek::nervous:

Social media is without a shadow of a doubt the antichrist!
 
The man wasn't popular before and is even less popular now, so it's far from likely that he is even candidate.

Possibility if too old, not sure who would succeed. He got near 20% in first round only 2% off being in the second round. I am expecting economic issues to push voters in that direction. We're already seeing the beginning of it here and in France.

I'm a center right conservative so it's not something I particularly want to happen. Fairly certain we will see Corbyn as PM here. Brexit and coming recession will finish the Tories off. Will get at least one term of Corbyn Labour.