Paul the Wolf
Former Score Predictions Comp Organiser (now out)
He as to be careful for what he wishes for.
A poisoned chalice if he won which is doubtful.
He as to be careful for what he wishes for.
It's a bit entitled or downright arrogant to expect the UK can revoke A50 and activate it again the next day, wasting everyobody's time for another 2 yeaes.
It's a bit entitled or downright arrogant to expect the UK can revoke A50 and activate it again the next day, wasting everyobody's time for another 2 years.
Should have thought twice before pulling the trigger. Ignorance is not an excuse at this level.
I agree, but if it is a choice between looking like a bit of a dick, or no-deal Brexit, then I know what I would choose.
I agree, but if it is a choice between looking like a bit of a dick, or no-deal Brexit, then I know what I would choose.
I agree, but if it is a choice between looking like a bit of a dick, or no-deal Brexit, then I know what I would choose.
they should put down one amendment - basically benns amendment that they pulled before the vote which is to rule out no deal... might actually get that one passedLabour will put down our own amendment next week, setting out our alternative plan based around a permanent customs union with a British say in future trade deals; a strong single market relationship; and a guarantee at least to keep pace with EU rights at work, environmental protections, and consumer standards.
- He said there were three key elements to Labour’s Brexit policy.Describing the Labour plan that the party will be tabling in the form of amendments, he said:
Those three elements provide the essential building blocks of a sensible deal with the clear potential to win majority support in parliament.
Corbyn's delusional unicorns
they should put down one amendment - basically benns amendment that they pulled before the vote which is to rule out no deal... might actually get that one passed
He's not at the races with regard to Brexit or anything to do with it. Left to him he couldn't care less how it all finished. It is immaterial to his objectives. Hard, soft, stay-in. It doesn't matter. Economy crashing? Could not care a jot. Corbyn is against capitalism and any construct of it. His whole philosophy in an ideal world would be to tear it down root and branch then start again with his world view. There is nothing in this current situation (or any crisis that this country might otherwise face) that detracts Corbyns mind from that. His plans are not affected by the state the country is in when he takes over so why should he be bothered trying to change outcomes.I wish Corbyn would show even a fraction of the enthusiasm for a referendum as he did for Hugo Chávez on that BBC documentary last night.
This is the long and short of it.He's not at the races with regard to Brexit or anything to do with it. Left to him he couldn't care less how it all finished. It is immaterial to his objectives. Hard, soft, stay-in. It doesn't matter. Economy crashing? Could not care a jot. Corbyn is against capitalism and any construct of it. His whole philosophy in an ideal world would be to tear it down root and branch then start again with his world view. There is nothing in this current situation (or any crisis that this country might otherwise face) that detracts Corbyns mind from that. His plans are not affected by the state the country is in when he takes over so why should he be bothered trying to change outcomes.
I dont think its even that, though that is a factor. Mainly, he wants Brexit every bit as much as JRM, and is just as terrified about the people getting a chance to kill it.Why is anybody wondering why Corbyn isn’t backing a second referendum?
Maybe it’s because UKIP were squeezing the Labour vote making significant inroads into their core support in some of their heartlands?
Umm. Ironically the same reason Cameron set the whole ball rolling in the first place.
Both were squeezed by UKIP and both have had to appease that element of their support.
To recind now changing position and offering another referendum means a resurgent UKIP is eminently possible in the aftermath in the event of a stay result, so it’s a moot point whether it solves the whole problem or merely kicks the can down the road.
It’s off the plate?Whatever happened to Breakfast Means Breakfast?
It’s off the plate?
He is, if you believe that he gives a shit. But if you look at his history he’s a huge eurosceptic so it’s quite clear he’s not going to bother his arse to do anything to try and reverse this shamblesCorbyn is a huge fecking let down
Corbyn is a huge fecking let down
Ah cmon, mention a few sure.
they should put down one amendment - basically benns amendment that they pulled before the vote which is to rule out no deal... might actually get that one passed
They should have a huge digital countdown clock in parliament and HOC - counting down until they’ve gone out on 31 March. Maybe it’ll wake some of them up. Make it have the countdown sound when it’s down to the last day
No it doesn't mean that, they're still paying for the transition and follow EU laws whilst still in the SM and the borders stay the same.
labour leadership challange from somebody if corbyn wont back a second referendum?
I think there would be enough MP's who would back a challange - and with 78% in the party wanting a second ref it might be pretty close
Collusion? Who did the remain campaign collude with?In my opinion it would be naive in the extreme to suppose that there was no colusion to paint the worst possible picture of the effects of leaving the EU by both the government, business and financial institutions.
In that case it IS lying. Premeditated colusion is lying.
Remember the Iraq war dodgy dossier?
Now. Do you really trust government to tell you the truth?
This is the long and short of it.
It quite a spectacle, when you think about it. Watching a lifelong Brexiter - Corbyn - calling for guarantees that we will remain in the single market, which I am reasonably sure in his heart of hearts he would be perfectly happy to see us leave - from a PM who campaigned for Remain.
If you had asked the two of them before Corbyn became Labour leader to give their views on the Customs Union I am positive May would have said more positive things. Corbyn is only pretending to give a shit about the CU as an olive branch to the remain supporting members who put him in power.
By this do you mean the divorce bill? But the weekly payments would stop wouldn't they?
And freedom of movement would end under her deal?
In my opinion it would be naive in the extreme to suppose that there was no colusion to paint the worst possible picture of the effects of leaving the EU by both the government, business and financial institutions.
In that case it IS lying. Premeditated colusion is lying.
Remember the Iraq war dodgy dossier?
Now. Do you really trust government to tell you the truth?
Collusion? Who did the remain campaign collude with?
You still haven't provided a single lie. Strange considering there were too many to list.
He is, if you believe that he gives a shit. But if you look at his history he’s a huge eurosceptic so it’s quite clear he’s not going to bother his arse to do anything to try and reverse this shambles
By this do you mean the divorce bill? But the weekly payments would stop wouldn't they?
And freedom of movement would end under her deal?
for the period between 1 January 2021 and the end of the transition period, the United
Kingdom shall: shall make a contribution to the Union budget, as determined in accordance
with paragraph 3;
UGH.
So the answer is, no, you cannot give any specific examples then?
Read those aspersions back to yourself, then have a word with yourself.
Have you seen the James O'Brien vs Jacob Rees Mogg debate?
I think James was great in it, not quite as he was against Farage but he was still able to expose JRM for the fraud he is