Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
I said the main reason was about foreigners, I didn't mention what number 2 , 3 and 4 were.
Out of interest what do you think are the other reasons ?


As people voted leave because of austerity caused by ... and leaving the EU would have changed that? makes no sense.
Well welcome to the Brexit debate. If you cut peoples way of living and the way they function in society while enriching yourself(class war)for years all while putting the blame on immigrates, disable people, even poorer people on benefits, the EU and propagandising the way the economy works then yes people are going to be very confused. It's in fact the conservative & liberal EU supporters(Basically you paul)who made leaving the EU possible.
 
Out of interest what do you think are the other reasons ?

Well welcome to the Brexit debate. If you cut peoples way of living and the way they function in society while enriching yourself(class war)for years all while putting the blame on immigrates, disable people, even poorer people on benefits, the EU and propagandising the way the economy works then yes people are going to be very confused. It's in fact the the conservative & liberal EU supporters(Basically you paul)who made leaving the EU possible.

I am not disputing that people voted for numerous reasons, like belief that their life will be better if they left the EU, that the NHS will improve, desperation, that certain groups of people they believe are responsible for their plight . I know the reasons , my big gripe with the whole thing that if they didn't believe the papers, the lying leave campaign I would have expected the result to have been significantly different. People being so gullible is incomprehensible.

I am actually more infuriated now, the evidence is there , even the government have made public what would happen in the event of a no deal Brexit but apparently not a massive number of people have changed their mind, haha.
 
I am actually more infuriated now, the evidence is there , even the government have made public what would happen in the event of a no deal Brexit but apparently not a massive number of people have changed their mind, haha.
I can why people voted for it in the first place but yes now we sort of know(We really don't know how bad it could get)it's just plan stupid and dangerous(The NL border) to actively support any no deal situation.
 


Wait, so it seems (if true) that the UK will be out of the EU, but will be in the CU, will be freedom of movement (no border) and presumably will keep paying and will not have a vote and that is a concession from the EU? or I understood wrong?
 
I've posted multiple times now that xenophobia has been a factor in the Brexit vote. Nobody denies that. The extent of that xenophobia and of outright racism, which despite Paul's recent protestations has long been an accusation he's leveled at the leave vote, is highly debatable. I've taken specific and particular disagreement with a statement by Paul and been quite clear about the basis on which I've done that. It's a narrative he's been peddling on here for years and it needs pulling up.

What I will say is completely my opinion. I believe most of the people is xenophobic to a certain degree. Also I believe most of the people do not have any problem with a foreigner in a neutral or positive environment. Is even nice to meet someone from somewhere else, share experiences or simply you don't mind. But when you get the sensation that this person is affecting negatively your life, and is part of a collective that you think have less rights than you for the sole fact that is not born in your area, then is when you have a problem with them, even if is just a liiiitle bit that might not affect really much your perception....but it does. And that doesn't only happen between countries. It happens city vs countryside, neighbouring towns/cities, even neighbourhoods in big cities (and not that big)

So, for the ones that wants to sell the narrative that immigration is a problem, they only need to fan the flames of it and making this little bit of xenophobia, bigger, and the ones that are already xenophobic, being straight assholes on the topic. We had been seeing that lately everywhere and yes UK included.

Till here I just said what is obvious (I think)

My believe is that Brexit is deeply xenophobic, I don't see for which reason UK would vote against the EU. someone appeals ignorance, and yes, but is xenophobic ignorance. in my opinion there are 2 big topics.

- They appeal to foreigners stealing jobs=Xenophobic.
- Taking back control of the country as other countries deciding on and badly for the UK, like foreign stupidity, deliberately wanting to harm the UK or other reasons ignoring that most of the rules, UK had a big saying and some of them, related to immigration were not enforcing them=Xenophobic.
- Foreigners taking advantage of UK benefits. Not being seen as a problem that a brittish takes advantage nor that for example there are less spanish people in UK than brittish in the UK and that the first are mostly young and healthy and paying taxes and the latest are mostly old and using the spanish health care system and liberating the brittish of that burden=Xenophobic

Even me I made some assumptions and some comments that are xenophobic.

You are saying that:
"It's a narrative he's been peddling on here for years and it needs pulling up."

Good luck with that, you are asking proves to Paul, you can't prove the opposite neither.

Even in your link, that is completely not about what we are discussing, because this article is about brittish as a whole, and not leavers, that is what Paul was saying, you just picked what suit your opinion and I can do the same:

http://nationalconversation.uk/wp-c...onversation-exec-summary-2018-09-v2-PRINT.pdf
link said:
Many of the concerns about
immigration centred on sovereignty and the UK government’s lack of control over EU migration
flows, or the belief that immigration regulations were not enforced

It shows that Many have at a certain degree xenophobia for the EU immigrants
link said:
A majority of the online survey respondents chose either the minimum or the maximum score: almost
one-third (31%) gave a score of 1 out of 10 and a quarter (23%) gave a score of 10 out of 10. This
helps to explain the highly polarised nature of online debate. These most strongly-held views were
much rarer in the nationally representative ICM research, where just 15% of the ICM sample chose
either end of the spectrum: in ICM’s representative poll, just 8% chose the lowest score of one, and
just 7% the highest score of ten.
Figure 1 below shows the responses to the open online survey and nationally representative ICM
research together, highlighting the difference between online debate and overall public opinion.

You speak about balancers. I speak that the top "haters" are 31% and the top "lovers" are 23%. In a voting, that would be de decisive factor as the rest of 46% would be balanced and therefore, a majority of Xenophobics would win. Thats what a majority is called.

And that with BRITTISH POPULATION, not Leavers, that is what we are discussing. I am sure that if we would only take leavers, that balancers would go to another scale

And another one:
link said:
Most people want EU migration to be better managed

If that is not a sentence in your own link that Most of the people in the UK are xenophobic at a certain degree with the EU immigrants I don't know whatelse can be

And I repeat, the study refers to brittish, remain and leave, not only leave

One of the few things related with Leavers that I saw is this:"

link said:
In contrast 53% of
Leave voters believed that the UK should not offer a preferential immigration deal to the EU, even if
business would lose out, compared with 16% of Remain voters

That is not only majority, but absolutely majority negative towards EU immigration

You can discuss shadows of greys on my comments, but definitely you will not "pull up any narrative" with that even if you think you need to.

Opinions are based in our on reality, our own sources and environment, and there are many that have that opinion and as difficult is proof that is the reality as is impossible to measure the entire population, specially when some people they are not even aware that are xenophobic, the same way you will not be able to proof the oposite

What I think we can agree, being the MAINLY reason or not, is that Xenophobia was an important part of it
 
Last edited:
What I think we can agree, being the MAINLY reason or not, is that Xenophobia was an important part of it

A fool would state otherwise.

However you have completely misunderstood the reason for my interjection. I called this following statement to be patently false:

"British people don't want foreigners in the UK"

It is provably false and has been upthread.

It would be true to state that "some British people don't want some foreigners in the UK" This we know and it is absurd to argue otherwise.

Your definition of xenophobia does not equate to the accepted which would encompass a broad spectrum of accepted linguistic definitions to include irrational fear or hatred, dislike and/ore prejudice against foreigners.

"Most people want EU migration to be managed" does not meet this definition. What this tells us is that most people want EU migration to be managed. Their reasons for doing so are explored in the research and will no doubt include, but not be wholly concerned with, xenophobic attitudes

"In contrast 53% of Leave voters believed that the UK should not offer a preferential immigration deal to the EU, even if business would lose out, compared with 16% of Remain voters"

As above. A percentage of that 53% will no doubt be voting due to their xenophobia, as meets accepted definition, but all that we are sure of is that 53% are saying that the UK should not offer a preferential deal to the EU.

This is not semantics - this is simple and fundamental interpretation of really basic data.

Added to this we have the linked substantial research into why people voted a certain way with the summary findings seemingly at odds with your own and with Paul's. That's your prerogative but personally I'll take that summary at face value rather than stick my fingers in my ears, claim people are lying, and produce a poll of two members of my family as some sort of counter argument
 
A fool would state otherwise.

However you have completely misunderstood the reason for my interjection. I called this following statement to be patently false:

"British people don't want foreigners in the UK"

It is provably false and has been upthread.

It would be true to state that "some British people don't want some foreigners in the UK" This we know and it is absurd to argue otherwise.

Your definition of xenophobia does not equate to the accepted which would encompass a broad spectrum of accepted linguistic definitions to include irrational fear or hatred, dislike and/ore prejudice against foreigners.

"Most people want EU migration to be managed" does not meet this definition. What this tells us is that most people want EU migration to be managed. Their reasons for doing so are explored in the research and will no doubt include, but not be wholly concerned with, xenophobic attitudes

"In contrast 53% of Leave voters believed that the UK should not offer a preferential immigration deal to the EU, even if business would lose out, compared with 16% of Remain voters"

As above. A percentage of that 53% will no doubt be voting due to their xenophobia, as meets accepted definition, but all that we are sure of is that 53% are saying that the UK should not offer a preferential deal to the EU.

This is not semantics - this is simple and fundamental interpretation of really basic data.

Added to this we have the linked substantial research into why people voted a certain way with the summary findings seemingly at odds with your own and with Paul's. That's your prerogative but personally I'll take that summary at face value rather than stick my fingers in my ears, claim people are lying, and produce a poll of two members of my family as some sort of counter argument


I agree totally with @4bars
You keep ignoring facts - you only see what you want to see.

Theresa May has said the UK voted to leave the EU and the UK will be leaving the EU on 29th March and it is the will of the people, you had better send a letter quickly to her to say that Barca84 is not leaving the EU, didn't vote to leave and it's not your will.
I'm sure she'll be sympathetic to your pedantic semantics.

You quote some survey which has radically different results and even quotes exactly what I said.
This survey has only a marginal relevance to EU immigration as the majority is about overall immigration.

Does your argument about the 53% means that it is only European immigrants that are objected to and what is the objection, what's wrong with them.
Let everybody in , eh?

You can answer one of my polls:
5 people go for a job interview.
Let's say yourself , let's say you're a local lad from Manchester.
4 other people, one from Scotland with a deep scottish accent, one from Norwich with a broad accent, one from Holland with a slight Dutch accent, one from Bulgaria with a Bulgarian accent.
Each are equally qualified and would all be paid the same salary.
On a scale of 1 to 10 how upset would you be if
1. The Scottish guy got the job
2. The guy from Norwich got the job
3. The Dutch guy got the job.
4. The Bulgarian guy got the job


You don't like people's personal experiences, how about we pool them all together. If I recall correctly you don't like experience of people on social media, comments on newspapers because they don't represent real life ,only your survey counts even though it is largely off subject.

And you still can't prove that I'm wrong.

You still can't disprove a thing I've said.

Here's another one for you, I've personally travelled in and out of the UK hundreds of times and not once I have walked straight through the border.
How unlucky am I, it's only a personal anecdote so therefore the UK borders must be open, take control of our borders because the only person who is stopped is Paul the Wolf, do all the rest just walk through unchallenged?

Remember the only 2% approx that has swayed the result despite the drastic warnings by the government what will happen to the economy. Can we safely assume that the rubbish spouted about how the economy will be better off outside the EU can be dispelled, another lie possibly? One other reason ruled out? No-one still come up with any rules that devastate their lives, and I saw yesterday on the BBC that the proportion of people who voted Leave as a protest vote was negligible. If people understood how the EU worked then they wouldn't be talking about how much more democratic the UK system is.
Don't seem to have many reasons left.

Your words:
"British people don't want foreigners in the UK"

It is provably false and has been upthread.

Therefore you are saying that British people do want foreigners in the UK, problem solved, no need for HOPE/HATE, no need to stop FoM, everyone's welcome.
 
Last edited:
The very fact that the reddest of red lines about our future relationship with the EU is the ending of FOM proves that at least in the government's mind, stopping foreigners coming into the country, is what the electorate voted for. Economic considerations comes 2nd
 
Why does stopping fom mean stopping foreigners? Most of the people i work with are from asia or south africa. They apply for jobs here, get the job then apply for visas. Whats wrong with that system?
 
Why does stopping fom mean stopping foreigners? Most of the people i work with are from asia or south africa. They apply for jobs here, get the job then apply for visas. Whats wrong with that system?

Latest UK migration stats
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopula...migrationstatisticsquarterlyreport/august2018

You will see the rate of EU immigration has been steadily falling - even last year EU8 countries was a net reduction.
Look at the immigration from non-EU - increasing significantly and especially from Asia.

Wait until the UK try to do deals with Asian countries.
 
Last edited:
I agree totally with @4bars

Yes I expect you would as he was largely agreeing with you.

You keep ignoring facts - you only see what you want to see.

Nope. Simply linked to a variety of research that debunks your false statement

Theresa May has said the UK voted to leave the EU and the UK will be leaving the EU on 29th March and it is the will of the people, you had better send a letter quickly to her to say that Barca84 is not leaving the EU, didn't vote to leave and it's not your will.
I'm sure she'll be sympathetic to your pedantic semantics.

A childish suggestion. Writing to the PM won't make any difference and if this is a course of action you take yourself I suggest an approach more effective. Hopefully there'll be something more substantial put in place. Re semantics - I refer you to my previous thoughts on this. Words and detail are important even if they create you difficulty - it's tempting to simplify but it impoverishes the debate as we've seen.

You quote some survey which has radically different results and even quotes exactly what I said.

No it doesn't, anywhere, say that "The British don't want foreigners".

This survey has only a marginal relevance to EU immigration as the majority is about overall immigration.

This debate is about your statement above. You did not state "the British don't want foreigners from the EU". That would be a similar but significantly different debate.

Does your argument about the 53% means that it is only European immigrants that are objected to and what is the objection, what's wrong with them.
Let everybody in , eh?

Nowhere have I said this, Are you confusing me with someone else?

You can answer one of my polls:
5 people go for a job interview.
Let's say yourself , let's say you're a local lad from Manchester.
4 other people, one from Scotland with a deep scottish accent, one from Norwich with a broad accent, one from Holland with a slight Dutch accent, one from Bulgaria with a Bulgarian accent.
Each are equally qualified and would all be paid the same salary.
On a scale of 1 to 10 how upset would you be if
1. The Scottish guy got the job
2. The guy from Norwich got the job
3. The Dutch guy got the job.
4. The Bulgarian guy got the job

No thanks. Your poll is infantile and as irrelevant to the discussion as your poll of your family. However the presence of xenophobic attitude and/or racism in your family relationships could possibly be a significant predeterminant of your continued insistence that such attitudes largely drove the leave vote. In simpler terms could you have extrapolated from a study of two people the voting incentives of 17 million? If so it's a risky calculation to make.


You don't like people's personal experiences, how about we pool them all together. If I recall correctly you don't like experience of people on social media, comments on newspapers because they don't represent real life ,only your survey counts even though it is largely off subject.

I love to hear about people's experiences. Just not as anectodal and unverifiable evidence to support an inaccurate statement.

And you still can't prove that I'm wrong.

Your statement above has been disproved.

You still can't disprove a thing I've said.

You're repeating yourself.

Here's another one for you, I've personally travelled in and out of the UK hundreds of times and not once I have walked straight through the border.
How unlucky am I, it's only a personal anecdote so therefore the UK borders must be open, take control of our borders because the only person who is stopped is Paul the Wolf, do all the rest just walk through unchallenged?

We're not debating this. We're debating your statement above. Stop deflecting.

Remember the only 2% approx that has swayed the result despite the drastic warnings by the government what will happen to the economy. Can we safely assume that the rubbish spouted about how the economy will be better off outside the EU can be dispelled, another lie possibly? One other reason ruled out? No-one still come up with any rules that devastate their lives, and I saw yesterday on the BBC that the proportion of people who voted Leave as a protest vote was negligible. If people understood how the EU worked then they wouldn't be talking about how much more democratic the UK system is.
Don't seem to have many reasons left.

Not relevant to the debate re your false statement.

Your words:

"British people don't want foreigners in the UK"

These were your words. You'll find them in your posting history.

It is provably false and has been upthread.

Those are mine.

Therefore you are saying that British people do want foreigners in the UK, problem solved, no need for HOPE/HATE, no need to stop FoM, everyone's welcome.

No that's not what I've said is it? It's Hope Not Hate and it's not what they say either. Neither does the executive summary of the National Conversation on Immigration. See my previous post for further detail or read the survey report again. If the summary is not clear enough perhaps you should read the whole thing?

I think we've made some progress injecting some solid independent research into the Brexit vote and on immigration in general into this discussion. It's good to challenge stereotypes and entrenched positions particularly ones built on suspect foundations of purely personal experience.
 
Last edited:
Latest UK migration stats
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopula...migrationstatisticsquarterlyreport/august2018

You will see the rate of EU immigration has been steadily falling - even last year EU8 countries was a net reduction.
Look at the immigration from non-EU - increasing significantly and especially from Asia.

Wait until the UK try to do deals with Asian countries.
Well all the eastern europeans are here, that why my company needs to look further afield.
 
Whats this about?

Feck knows. I've "been warned" though. Don't know how I'll sleep.

You want me to correct your post using my name because ....

If you don't change it and the previous time I'll have to get it moderated, twice you've made out I've said things which I haven't.

No I haven't. You know the drill Paul. Link please?
 
Feck knows. I've "been warned" though. Don't know how I'll sleep.

No I haven't. You know the drill Paul. Link please?

That's the whole point I can't link. You said you understood, quite obviously you didn't.
Your post 30849 looks as if I wrote your comments. You have already done it before in the previous pages . I can't reply to your post because you used it under my name and I can't reply to it. You are clearly having trouble using the quote button.