sullydnl
Ross Kemp's caf ID
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2012
- Messages
- 34,749
Obliging the wish of the Irish i expect. Ffs, is that not more important?
What Irish wish is anyone obliging? Ireland is overwhelmingly against all of this.
Obliging the wish of the Irish i expect. Ffs, is that not more important?
Thats ok, eu seems like it wants uk to impose borders. NiceWhat Irish wish is anyone obliging? Ireland is overwhelmingly against all of this.
Obliging the wish of the Irish i expect. Ffs, is that not more important?
If they don't remain in the single market /customs union they have to negotiate a new set of tariffs with the WTO which will mean duties , VAT and so on with the EU - looks like an advert to join the EU.
By looking quickly at that paper they seem to have forgotten that they gave up their place with the WTO in 1973 when they joined the EEC and are members only because they are part of the EU and have to re-negotiate their WTO status - I've only skimmed through it but surely they can't be this stupid.
Thats ok, eu seems like it wants uk to impose borders. Nice
What Irish wish is anyone obliging? Ireland is overwhelmingly against all of this.
Against all of what ??
Against the UK leaving the EU ?
Or against an EU imposed hard border ?
Both and then some, especially given the two are directly linked.
UK leaving the EU - might be hard and harsh on the Republic, but I don't think too many UK voters were thinking about the effects on the Republic when they were asked if they wanted to REMAIN or LEAVE. Seems that the EU have forgotten the shared history and benefits to Irish and UK citizens coming from The Ireland Act 1949 which is still UK Law, and therefore will take precedence over EU Law post-Brexit as far as the UK is concerned.
The Hard Border - if the Republic doesn't want a Hard Border, speak up to the EU....Shout it loud and clear to the EU....Tell the Taosich to mediate instead of sitting on his arse and and being stubborn....On the other hand, if the Republic do want a Hard Border, just put one up yourselves - I'm sure the EU will pay for it.
So what's your solution / preference ?
A Hard Border to ' stay onside ' with the EU ?
And open border to keep the island ' sort of ' together ?
So what's your solution / preference ?
A Hard Border to ' stay onside ' with the EU ?
And open border to keep the island ' sort of ' together ?
You do realize that it's on the UK, an open border can only exist if you follow EU's rules and are under EU's jurisdictions. You still don't understand what you did?
These were the Irish Taoiseach's comments on the border earlier in the year:
"If anyone is angry, it should be us.”
“What we’re not going to do is to design a border for the Brexiteers because they’re the ones who want a border.
“It’s up to them to say what it is, say how it would work and first of all convince their own people, their own voters that this is actually a good idea.
“Currently there is no economic border. There hasn’t been an economic border since 1992. As far as this government is concerned there shouldn’t be an economic border. We don’t want one.
“It’s the United Kingdom, it’s Britain that has decided to leave and if they want to put forward smart solutions, technological solutions for borders of the future and all of that that’s up to them.
“We’re not going to be doing that work for them because we don’t think there should be an economic border at all. That is our position.
“It’s our position in negotiations with the British Government and it’s the very clear position that we have when we engage with the task force that is negotiating on our behalf with the United Kingdom.
“We do not think it is in the interests of our country. We do not think it’s in the interests of Northern Ireland or the United Kingdom that there should be an economic border between our two countries or on our island and we’re not going to be helping them to design some sort of border that we don’t believe should exist in the first place.
“So let them put forward their proposals as to how they think a border should operate and then we’ll ask them if they really think this is such a good idea because I think it will have a very severe impact on their economy if they decide to go down that route.”
Ireland doesn't want a hard border, which is why it was against Brexit.
However, Ireland will be slow to blame the EU for the direct consequences of a decision made by the UK. Especially when the Irish goverment clearly and repeatedly flagged this potentially dire outcome to the UK prior to the vote. This weird logic where the EU are to blame for things the UK decided to do only really carries within the UK.
The EU can be held accountable for the rules the EU sets though can't it?
It is the EU's rules that will prohibit the border being the way the UK and Ireland would prefer it to be.
Now the UK has decided to leave, the EU can hold to its rules on external borders given the changed circumstances or not. Let's not pretend that isn't a choice.
The point of leaving would be that we aren't and don't want to be anymore though wouldn't it.
The Irish want to keep the border open they are.
I know that it's the point and you are going to find me one country that has open borders with a country without following common rules. The entire problem here is that you don't want to follow common rules, you want to make your own and then blame the EU.
The situation is in itself very simple, the moment you decided to leave the EU and the Custom Union you recreated the border, that was automatic for the simple reason that you created two areas with two jurisdictions. Now the question is how do you intend to control that border, that you created. When you have an answer to that then we can discuss about a deal that will hopefully make the border useless.
What is asked here is to create a clear environment in case of absence of deal before the day of Brexit, this question can not influence future negotiations.
Its just another example of eu shirking, highlight a problem without offering a suggested solution. The fact the issue has arisen cos of the vote is irrelevant.
They shirk every difficult issue. Thats more a fact than an opinion.Jesus Christ, you actually have the cheek to accuse them of 'shirking' in the same paragraph where you shirk your own responsibility? That'd be funny if it wasn't so tragic.
Can we just remember for a second that this isn't some issue that only hurts the Irish? If a hard border leads to renewed violence then its mostly going to be Northern Irish citizens getting killed, not southern Irish citizens.
The UK created this mess and it now expects the EU to bend the rules and sort this out. Sweet.
May i remind you that this issue wouldnt even be a problem if the UK left the EU but stayed in the customs union. Unfortunately none of the options (EU, EEA, Customs Union etc) were deemed good enough for the UK. So for once just take your own responsibility and admit you dont care about the Irish instead of blaming the EU
Jesus Christ, you actually have the cheek to accuse them of 'shirking' in the same paragraph where you shirk your own responsibility? That'd be funny if it wasn't so tragic.
Can we just remember for a second that this isn't some issue that only hurts the Irish? If a hard border leads to renewed violence then its mostly going to be Northern Irish citizens getting killed, not southern Irish citizens.
Accede to all of our demands and disregard the spirit of your referendum; EU speak for 'ball in your court'. These past months have done nothing to engender a feeling of buyer's remorse, that's for sure.
Considering how important it is to them, how about they release an itemised list of our dues and put a precise number on it.
Look up "The Troubles" and you'll see why.Why would that be ?
Seems to me that the UK does care about what's best for both Irelands.
Silly them to think that the EU might care as well.
Why would that be ?
Tactics....Designed to make it as difficult as possible for the UK.
EU say they won't discuss anything else until agreement on a leaving / divorce settlement, but, of course, won't or can't provide an itemised bill.
Seems absolutely obvious that the EU wants to cut all ties with the UK on BREXIT day and they are using the refusal to provide the leaving / divorce settlementl as their main weapon
Davis et al are too polite / desperate to actually come out and say that, but it's probably getting near the time when the UK should perhaps put the ball back in the EU's court and say that the UK has already agreed to pay what's correct and reaonable, which it has, but he can't discuss anything else ( ECJ, FoM, Transition Period, Irish Border ) till he's seen the bill. Certainly, it's time for the UK to grow a pair.
We're long past those days though so I doubt we'll see killings, somehow.
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-10866072February 2017
January 2017
- A bomb explodes outside the home of a serving police officer in Londonderry on 22 February as Army experts try to defuse it. The device, which police described as more intricate than a pipe bomb, was reportedly discovered under a car in Culmore in the city. Children were in the area at the time, police said.
- A gun attack on a 16-year-old boy in west Belfast on 16 February was "child abuse," a senior police officer said.
- The attack followed a similar one the previous night, when a man was shot in the legs close to a benefits office on the Falls Road.
- A police officer is injured in a gun attack at a garage on north Belfast's Crumlin Road on 22 January. Police said automatic gunfire was sprayed across the garage forecourt in a "crazy" attack. A 36-year-old man is arrested and police say the main line of inquiry is "violent dissident republicans".
- The number of paramilitary-style shootings in west Belfast doubled in 2016 compared to the previous year, according to police figures. The figures do not take into account three shootings in Belfast's Turf Lodge area since the start of January.
- On 15 January, police say a bomb discovered during a security operation in Poleglass, west Belfast, was "designed to kill or seriously injure police officers".
- A judge on 6 January revokes the bail of a County Tyrone man facing trial on charges linked to the murder of prison officer David Black. Damien Joseph McLaughlin, 40, of Kilmascally Road near Ardboe, is due to stand trial in February. The court is told Mr McLaughlin had not been seen by police since November.
Why would that be ?
it's those in the UK that should be concerned if the UK goes for the cliff edge.
This thread is worth a read. And the guy writing works for “The Leave Alliance”. He wanted Brexit but is horrified about the balls up the Tories are making of the implementation. In a way it’s good to see that not all Brexiters have their heads in the sand but it’s shocking to hear how deep the government have buried theirs.
Quite so Paul and it seems to be giving you that itch you can't scratch because they don't seem concerned - very annoying isn't it, but hey don't worry yourself, you're nice and tucked up, safe in the cosy EU land bed, you can have your duvet-days without a care in the world, Mama Merkel will look after you, don't worry... be happy?
I think what's blatantly obvious is that nobody ever expected it to go through, all Tories included. I doubt even Boris or Farage thought they had any hope either. It's pretty evident in how they have had absolutely no idea what to do since it happened.
Theresa should've stuck with her "Brexit means Brexit" speech, it was probably still fecking better with what they've done since.
Having fixed border crossing points also pretty much guarantees that they'll be a major target.
This is so obvious.
Basically, the EU can't make it easy allow and a favourable divorce for the UK. If they do, all other EU nations would line up and demand similar. That would be a trigger for EU to cease existence in its present format.
I think what's blatantly obvious is that nobody ever expected it to go through, all Tories included. I doubt even Boris or Farage thought they had any hope either. It's pretty evident in how they have had absolutely no idea what to do since it happened.
Theresa should've stuck with her "Brexit means Brexit" speech, it was probably still fecking better with what they've done since.
Man you really haven't a fecking clue do you.Major target? for who, for what purpose?
It would seem the Republicans in NI long since gave up the idea they could bomb the province into a United Ireland and the Unionists realise that the Republican ideal of a United Ireland isn't going to go away.
Brexit will force a new look at things sure, but ultimately it won't be Brussels or London that solve the problem, it will be Dublin and Belfast and the whole of Ireland will probably be better off for it!
So you're saying you now finally understand that if this all goes wrong its the UK not the EU who are fecked? And can you extend that chain of logic onto how it might effect the negotiating positions of each party?
The EU can be held accountable for the rules the EU sets though can't it?
It is the EU's rules that will prohibit the border being the way the UK and Ireland would prefer it to be.
Now the UK has decided to leave, the EU can hold to its rules on external borders given the changed circumstances or not. Let's not pretend that isn't a choice.
Cameron and the Tories should have at least had an outline plan, but politicians and arrogance are inseperable.
Major target? for who, for what purpose?
It would seem the Republicans in NI long since gave up the idea they could bomb the province into a United Ireland and the Unionists realise that the Republican ideal of a United Ireland isn't going to go away.
Brexit will force a new look at things sure, but ultimately it won't be Brussels or London that solve the problem, it will be Dublin and Belfast and the whole of Ireland will probably be better off for it!