vidic blood & sand
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2013
- Messages
- 4,134
So is their debt and unemployment rate
Oh shit we better vote for Faron or we're all screwed.
So is their debt and unemployment rate
Its important for devlishs' argumentNo.
Didn't even officially declare war on Argentina, either....
But not unusual - when / who was the last time anyone officially declared war on another country - it's sort of gone out of fashion.
Yeah except for the 5 Billion Mark (5bil. 1950's money) paid by Germany during that time (between 1946 and 1950) for hosting those armies. I can't find the numbers for between 1950-1955, but it was 300mil DM paid afterwards to each of them per year... Probably only a fraction of the actual costs of the 4, but it's not as if they didn't cost 'a single pound'.I've always believed the basis for Germany's rebirth and economic prosperity that we now see, was that for most of my time there there were 2 million+ US, UK and French military personnel and their families stationed there as part of the Cold War. All these people ( we were one of them ) spent all their income into the German economy but didn't take anything out of it. They had their own schools, hospitals, etc, which cost the German Government nothing, and it's difficult to imagine what a fantastic set of circumstances that was for Germany. Imagine having two million immigrants come into France or the UK who you don't have to find jobs for; spend all their money in France or the UK; don't cost the French or UK Government a single pound for health services and education and housing; and don't qualify for the countries' Social Security and Pensions systems. Even UKIP would support that.
They do that here tooThey should probably take a leaf out of the Tories' book and decrease unemployment numbers by making use of zero hour contracts and low income part-time work.
Yeah except for the 5 Billion Mark (5bil. 1950's money) paid by Germany during that time (between 1946 and 1950) for hosting those armies. I can't find the numbers for between 1950-1955, but it was 300mil DM paid afterwards to each of them per year... Probably only a fraction of the actual costs of the 4, but it's not as if they didn't cost 'a single pound'.
So is their debt and unemployment rate
I won't argue with you, although I was always told that the money paid to the foreign militaries was because the Germans weren't allowed to have their own 'full-on military' during those years, and the amount they 'contributed' was based on the cost they would have incurred if they had had their own military.
Rent-an-Army, if you want....
Not really and you know that already. If they get into the same debt as Greece they wont be tied to Germanys...........er.......I mean the EU's ransom program.True but the Uk are trying their best to go in the same direction.
Not really and you know that already. If they get into the same debt as Greece they wont be tied to Germanys...........er.......I mean the EU's ransom program.
I'm not sure what the money was for exactly. I think we can both agree that having the American, English and French there was hugely beneficial for West Germany at the time either way, I just wanted to point out that the new Germany did contribute a bit too.
Uk's debt is already 5 times bigger than Greece's
Ratio paul, you're just beimg argumentativeUk's debt is already 5 times bigger than Greece's
But so is the population.
Ratio paul, you're just beimg argumentative
WinkerNotice the wink
Winker
Notice the wink
Apologies.
On the other hand, I was cleaning out my PC yesterday, removing old files / downloads, and came across this one.
It seems that in 2012, the UK had contingent liabilities - not actual liablilities - of almost €150 billion directly as a result of it's EU membership.
Makes you think - €150+ billion was resting on the good financial health of the EU and some of its members, nothing to do with the UK's own economic status / performance.
https://www.brugesgroup.com/media-c...e-eib-and-other-european-financial-mechanisms
Seems unbelievably stupid to me - without being part of the Eurozone, the UK might have to cough up €150+billion ( or how ever much that is now ) if the eurozone can't manage the Greeks' problems to the benefit of the EU rather than Greece.
I'm a bit slow on the uptake, but I'm wondering if some time ago Ken Clarke and a few others didn't go to May and say 'we don't want to split the party in public, but privately we're telling you we will vote against Brexit at the last'. Hence an absolute need for a larger majority, hence the election.
I'm a bit slow on the uptake, but I'm wondering if some time ago Ken Clarke and a few others didn't go to May and say 'we don't want to split the party in public, but privately we're telling you we will vote against Brexit at the last'. Hence an absolute need for a larger majority, hence the election.
Wasn't the party split at the time of the referendum though, in public?
May thought she would sweep up the UKIP voters, I think it's just pure arrogance and poor judgement combined with being power hungry that has led to this shambles.
Yes it was, I'm thinking that Clarke may have acted after and despite the referendum. This is a man who would almost certainly have led his party were he not pro-Europe. I suspect he would consider de-railing Brexit a pleasing and fitting end to his career. It's possible May had no choice, although if I am right, it leaves her with not a lot of choice now either!
I'm sure Clarke would love to derail Brexit. I'll be extremely surprised if May is still PM this time next year.
I tried to bet on her going last night, but I could only find odds on who the next leader would be. Everyone's saying Boris, as if. I was bit worse for wear though.
Can't he shut up? Is that really difficult?
But he's right though, May having a small majority or a large majority made little difference, having no majority does make a difference.
Europe will absolutely ream us for everything and rightly so.
I don't know why you say 'rightly so'....
As I posted on Wednesday in the other thread....
I don't vote, of course, but if I was, I'd break the habit of a lifetime and vote Tory.
Everything you say is absolutely why I've always been left-of-centre. But to me the BIGGEST problem for the UK over the next few years is the eventual state of the UK after the UK leaves the EU.
Get BREXIT wrong, and all the problems you're describing will be even more so and even worse....Even more devisive....
Much as I dislike May and many members of her cabinet, it seems to me that they are preferable to a coalition of Labour/LibDen/SNP, all of whom don't want the UK out of the EU, and so don't have the determination or the enthusiasm to make sure the UK doesn't get absolutely, totally screwed by the EU.
Labour or LibDem next time, perhaps, has to be the sensible way forward for the UK - but not this time....