horsechoker
The Caf's Ezza.
Any significance to Boris going to Brussels?
He will cave and spin.
It is not looking good.The pound will just get fed up with Brexit and throw itself off the parapet in the not too distant future. Presently just clinging on for dear life in the forlorn hope that it will all be alright.
It is not looking good.
I wonder if the vote was ran again, with the realities of Brexit explained, what the outcome would be.
You know it would be a win for leave again- their position has become entrenched.It is not looking good.
I wonder if the vote was ran again, with the realities of Brexit explained, what the outcome would be.
I'd imagine it'd be pretty much exactly reversed with about a 4% victory for remain at best. The Leave vote was never driven by practicalities. It's an, now deeply entrenched, ideological position.It is not looking good.
I wonder if the vote was ran again, with the realities of Brexit explained, what the outcome would be.
Any significance to Boris going to Brussels?
I'd imagine a pm in the middle of a global death lurgy is typically pretty busy and probably wouldn't be traveling unless there was something pretty important... so its either to announce a deal or take a shit on the espace leopold ... neither would shock me at this stage but I voted deal so ill stick with thatAny significance to Boris going to Brussels?
I'd imagine a pm in the middle of a global death lurgy is typically pretty busy and probably wouldn't be traveling unless there was something pretty important... so its either to announce a deal or take a shit on the espace leopold ... neither would shock me at this stage but I voted deal so ill stick with that
I think so too and voted Deal. I don't think Johnson stands for all that much himself, and will want to appear as the nice guy/hero that got a deal done at the last minute against all odds. (Or at least that's how he'll tell it, with a sprinkling of talk about EU extortion and the apocalypse on top as an apology to the no-dealers.)He will cave and spin.
People endorsed Brexit on multiple occasions by voting Conservative.America may have got rid of its buffoon but we are stuck with this plonker and his acolytes for years yet. What depressing times.
Same.It is not looking good.
I wonder if the vote was ran again, with the realities of Brexit explained, what the outcome would be.
He will cave and spin.
People endorsed Brexit on multiple occasions by voting Conservative.
Americans at least came out in numbers to get rid of Trump at the first opportunity. The difference is Americans lived through the worst of Trump while the British have yet to experience the worst of Brexit.
People endorsed Brexit on multiple occasions by voting Conservative.
Americans at least came out in numbers to get rid of Trump at the first opportunity. The difference is Americans lived through the worst of Trump while the British have yet to experience the worst of Brexit.
True but they still voted for the party which was explicitly pushing Brexit. That support only increased as the Brexit being offered became harder.Not really. Labour never ran a campaign based on reversing the Brexit madness, so the electorate hasn’t had a chance to vote for a different outcome since the referendum.
And by voting Labour in 2017, the Labour manifesto was quite clear about that. Not sure what voting Labour in 2019 meant to be honest, but it wasn't Remain at any rate.People endorsed Brexit on multiple occasions by voting Conservative.
Americans at least came out in numbers to get rid of Trump at the first opportunity. The difference is Americans lived through the worst of Trump while the British have yet to experience the worst of Brexit.
True but they still voted for the party which was explicitly pushing Brexit. That support only increased as the Brexit being offered became harder.
There were still parties offering an alternative but they never really saw increased support which says that people were ok with Brexit or that Brexit wasn't an important topic to them and they chose to vote Conservative based on other factors.
I don't know if the result would've swung the other way had their been a second referendum but it doesn't appear that support for Brexit declined by much since 2016.
On the one hand I agree that they never had the opportunity but on the other hand I think the UK electoral system is more favourable towards third parties even if they rarely succeed.You might be right. I’ve no idea. But the comparison with Trump doesn’t work. The UK electorate have never had a chance to undo their lunacy of 2016, unlike the US. Because neither of the major political parties were willing to give them that opportunity. Which is a crying shame.
I tend to think this would be the outcome. A hairline win for remain.I'd imagine it'd be pretty much exactly reversed with about a 4% victory for remain at best. The Leave vote was never driven by practicalities. It's an, now deeply entrenched, ideological position.
Our antiquated first past the post system played into their hands. They were the only Leave party (except the Brexit party who stood down in Tory constituencies). The remain or second referendum parties split the remain vote.People endorsed Brexit on multiple occasions by voting Conservative.
Americans at least came out in numbers to get rid of Trump at the first opportunity. The difference is Americans lived through the worst of Trump while the British have yet to experience the worst of Brexit.
Victim blaming springs to mind.Boris has just gone to take personal glory for getting the deal done. They'll be Churchill like front pages in a couple of days I'm sure of it.
There seems to be a bit of a spat on Twitter between leading remain figures right now so why not bring it to here too. How much are remainers to blame for this mess?
I still remember the indicative votes fiasco and being incredulous at the Lib Dems and TIG for not supporting several motions. It felt like a moment and yet slipped away. A customs union could have won with a few of these peoples votes yet they decided no compromise and look where we and they are now.
Victim blaming springs to mind.
Might be more like chamberlain in a few yearsBoris has just gone to take personal glory for getting the deal done. They'll be Churchill like front pages in a couple of days I'm sure of it.
Might be more like chamberlain in a few years
I tend to think this would be the outcome. A hairline win for remain.
The deeply entrenched ideological vote would stay the same. But there must be a small proportion of previous Leave voters disillusioned by the lies in the 2016 campaign and the reality of Brexit.
@Jippy @Paul the Wolf
Boris has just gone to take personal glory for getting the deal done. They'll be Churchill like front pages in a couple of days I'm sure of it.
There seems to be a bit of a spat on Twitter between leading remain figures right now so why not bring it to here too. How much are remainers to blame for this mess?
I still remember the indicative votes fiasco and being incredulous at the Lib Dems and TIG for not supporting several motions. It felt like a moment and yet slipped away. A customs union could have won with a few of these peoples votes yet they decided no compromise and look where we and they are now.
Or we might get some bizarre logic inversion where people say 'look how badly the EU is punishing us... we were definitely right to be shot of them'.It may be close and possibly remain might just win - but if you held the vote in a year's time I would imagine that remain would win quite easily , at least 60-40. So far very few people have been affected by it, the first people to moan will be the Brexiteers when reality hits home next year.
initially yes... give it a couple of years though if (when) those sunny uplands fail to materialize and I'm sure there will be plenty of papers looking to ensure people dont blame their pro brexit rhetoric and I suspect those untrustworthy europeans will be to blame as well as the people who signed the deal with johnny foreignerPost deal i don't see the papers attacking the government with that line. It's simply not in their owners interests to attack the government.
Any concessions will be characterised as shrewd compromises or they'll ignore them completely. Then you'll get the twitter folk saying remainers are just bitter that Boris got the deal they all said he could never get.
I do remember thinking whether we could end up potentially regretting the voting down of May's deal if we ended up sleepwalking into a no deal situation. Which it appears is sadly not an unrealistic situation anymore (and in fact is rabidly supported by some of the more extreme Brexiteers).
I agree with @Fluctuation0161 that there is perhaps an element of victim blaming there but once the vote happened, I think views on both sides became a bit more entrenched and some remainers lost sight of what should perhaps have been the ultimate aim, which is to ensure the softest of Brexits and as good a possible relationship with the EU in the future, hopefully with a view to rejoining in the medium to long term.
I'm also a bit surprised to see people talking about the support for remain in a new referendum. Does anyone here actually know a leaver who's changed their mind? Seems like the same sort of wishful thinking we've all had for the past 4 years.
Or we might get some bizarre logic inversion where people say 'look how badly the EU is punishing us... we were definitely right to be shot of them'.
I don't understand why people are re-running the Brexit vote. It was over in 2016 full stop.
The past is in the past and we have to forget about all the lies. History is just that. Time to move on.
I don't think there will be a re-run in our lifetime but just a hypothetical scenario when the regrets start happening in the months and years to come.
I reckon there might be a few changed minds in Sunderland when Nissan pack their bags.