Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
The woman is fecking eedyat... I could say worse but no need. Y'all know...
 
Odds on No Deal getting shot down?
 
I dont think a GE would accomplish anything much either. Labour will not be the party of remain while Corbyn is in charge, their Brexit policy is nonsensical if not completely incoherent. Both parties are utterly divided by Brexit, so a vote for either of them isnt a clear mandate for any course of action in particular.
 
What's the point of GE in any case, the EU must be growing really tired of this and just want to move on one way or the other?
 
I dont think a GE would accomplish anything much either. Labour will not be the party of remain while Corbyn is in charge, their Brexit policy is nonsensical if not completely incoherent. Both parties are utterly divided by Brexit, so a vote for either of them isnt a clear mandate for any course of action in particular.
So basically, it's Mays deal or no deal. A second referendum would cause major issues, especially if it's close again.
If a GE won't sort anything, then where do they go from here. You can't just revoke A50 and tell 17 million people that their vote was worthless and stupid and then beg for the same peoples votes in an election?
 
I imagine that's what'll happen. Or they'll push their brexit lite and promise that.

I think a second referendum will be far too divisive, and really accomplish nothing at all, other than further issues.
Labour wouldnt want to lose any seats in Brexit areas so they will promote their own Brexit deal and we will be back to square one.
 
So basically, it's Mays deal or no deal. A second referendum would cause major issues, especially if it's close again.
If a GE won't sort anything, then where do they go from here. You can't just revoke A50 and tell 17 million people that their vote was worthless and stupid and then beg for the same peoples votes in an election?
I honestly dont know. Im starting to think no deal is the likely outcome, because its what happens if nobody can agree to any other course of action, and it doesnt look like they can.

I think a referendum makes more sense than a GE, personally, because at least you get a clear answer, even if its close. But that isnt to say its likely, or that there are no problems with it. And even if we did go that route, the end destination is probably the same anyway. I suspect if you asked the country to choose between no deal and no brexit, they would choose no deal.
 
The woman is fecking eedyat... I could say worse but no need. Y'all know...
I think we needed someone who "understood" Europe to be in charge of the Government during the negotiations. I see Mrs May as quintessentially old-style English, which might be helpful in some circumstances but not in these.
 
I honestly dont know. Im starting to think no deal is the likely outcome, because its what happens if nobody can agree to any other course of action, and it doesnt look like they can.

I think a referendum makes more sense than a GE, personally, because at least you get a clear answer, even if its close. But that isnt to say its likely, or that there are no problems with it. And even if we did go that route, the end destination is probably the same anyway. I suspect if you asked the country to choose between no deal and no brexit, they would choose no deal.

Whilst I don't think Labour would run a remain campaign, I do think they could possibly run a 2nd ref campaign and go from there.
 
May saying people haven't changed their minds on leaving the eu as she tries to get MPs to change their minds on her deal.
 
I think we needed someone who "understood" Europe to be in charge of the Government during the negotiations. I see Mrs May as quintessentially old-style English, which might be helpful in some circumstances but not in these.

Penna to Number 10? :angel:
 
Labour will never campaign as a remain party with Corbyn in charge.

"I wish we were having a referendum in Britain" - JC on the Lisbon Treaty in 2004.


 
I think we needed someone who "understood" Europe to be in charge of the Government during the negotiations. I see Mrs May as quintessentially old-style English, which might be helpful in some circumstances but not in these.
I don't know whether I should be happy, sad or indifferent to today's events. :confused:

Labour will never campaign as a remain party with Corbyn in charge. "I wish we were having a referendum in Britain" - JC on the Lisbon Treaty in 2004.
Yea timing wise we have properly lucked out...
 
Labour will never run a remain campaign, I highly doubt they'd even run a second referendum one. A hell of a lot of their voters are also the ones who voted leave too, they aren't going to change.

Which leaves the question for those of us who are still slightly sane, who the hell do we vote for if GE comes up again?
 
Labour will never run a remain campaign, I highly doubt they'd even run a second referendum one. A hell of a lot of their voters are also the ones who voted leave too, they aren't going to change.

Which leaves the question for those of us who are still slightly sane, who the hell do we vote for if GE comes up again?
I wonder if this new Independent Group might try to actually become a new party and field candidates?
 
Labour will never run a remain campaign, I highly doubt they'd even run a second referendum one. A hell of a lot of their voters are also the ones who voted leave too, they aren't going to change.

Only 35% of Labour voters voted Leave. So feck the 65% who didn't?
 
I wonder if this new Independent Group might try to actually become a new party and field candidates?

I honestly don't see it. They'll have the same agenda regarding the EU and the popular vote.

It strikes me as incredibly strange that most politicians seem to want brexit, yet how many people don't trust politicians? How bizarre then that you'd vote for something both major parties pushed for, let alone nearly all the others. Basically, if all those in power wanted the same thing, surely that's pause for thought as to why?
 
I honestly don't see it. They'll have the same agenda regarding the EU and the popular vote.

It strikes me as incredibly strange that most politicians seem to want brexit, yet how many people don't trust politicians? How bizarre then that you'd vote for something both major parties pushed for, let alone nearly all the others. Basically, if all those in power wanted the same thing, surely that's pause for thought as to why?
But most MPs were remainers.
 
The EU don't want the backstop either but nothing that has happened has led to making a solution more likely because there isn't one other than having the border in the Irish Sea which is the solution the EU gave in the first place and the UK rejected.

The other thing I would say, if a solution were ever to be found it would be a disaster for the UK. It's just a delayed cliff edge.

True. But because a solution to the Irish border is equally against the EU on the Irish side of the border, the disaster would equally impinge on the EU.

Anyway it appears that the ERG, Labour and the DUP are hell bent on voting against the WA.
As I mentioned earlier I despair.
 
So why did the 65% vote Labour when it has been completely obvious that Corbyn is pro-Brexit.
Tory and Labour tribalism has ripped the UK apart.

Because the FPTP system meant that voting Lib Dem was, in many constituencies, essentially a vote for the Tories.