Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
She's been getting away with it for months and will continue to do so.
 
Enough is enough with her time wasting - MPs have to take control if she loses again tonight. Juncker and Barnier should also release a statement that they will not entertain any further discussion on the withdrawal agreement and will not change a comma.
 
Enough is enough with her time wasting - MPs have to take control if she loses again tonight. Juncker and Barnier should also release a statement that they will not entertain any further discussion on the withdrawal agreement and will not change a comma.
They already have, comments today about this being a second chance, and there being no third chance
 
The vote on no deal is totally meaningless - to stop no deal there has to be a deal or cancel brexit.

At the moment my no deal likelihood meter is at 99.9%. Hopefully something will change.

Thank you Paul, I've been trying to make this point for a while. There has to be a deal of some sort, even if its no deal (by default) or to cancel Brexit the only way to cancel Brexit now is to rescind, not simply delay, A50.

May will not (so people believe) rescind A50, they think she would resign first (as I've speculated elsewhere). I think she might do both, that is to resign as leader of the Tory party, her last act being to rescind A50, because its the one thing the majority of members in the HoP can agree on, and that will get wholehearted support from the EU.
May would then presumably gain the support of all remainers and be viewed by them perhaps even as a national heroine. Even the Tories (ERG included) would, with their capacity for self survival, see there was no other choice and with no 'backstop' shackles, they live to fight another day.

Specifically that would allow May's successor as the leader of the Tory Party/PM to remain in power for another 2 or more years, until after the EU elections, then to 'go again' to initiate the result of the referendum, to seek, this time with a euro-sceptic leader of the party, and as they would see it, to do Brexit properly this time. Yes, they risk losing some voters, but only in bye-elections, by the time the next GE is due, they will have learned from their mistakes... or then they will go under!.
 
Thank you Paul, I've been trying to make this point for a while. There has to be a deal of some sort, even if its no deal (by default) or to cancel Brexit the only way to cancel Brexit now is to rescind, not simply delay, A50.

May will not (so people believe) rescind A50, they think she would resign first (as I've speculated elsewhere). I think she might do both, that is to resign as leader of the Tory party, her last act being to rescind A50, because its the one thing the majority of members in the HoP can agree on, and that will get wholehearted support from the EU.
May would then presumably gain the support of all remainers and be viewed by them perhaps even as a national heroine. Even the Tories (ERG included) would, with their capacity for self survival, see there was no other choice and with no 'backstop' shackles, they live to fight another day.

Specifically that would allow May's successor as the leader of the Tory Party/PM to remain in power for another 2 or more years, until after the EU elections, then to 'go again' to initiate the result of the referendum, to seek, this time with a euro-sceptic leader of the party, and as they would see it, to do Brexit properly this time. Yes, they risk losing some voters, but only in bye-elections, by the time the next GE is due, they will have learned from their mistakes... or then they will go under!.
We hope and pray
 
Good old Woke Soubz claiming she'd never vote for something that would make her constituents poorer.

Whatever you do, don't look up her voting record.
How dare you? Mentioning her voting record is bullying. apparently
 
I for one am looking forward to the 'yelling at an old woman' event to come this evening.
 
Why does not she just resigns and walks away saying that if they can't sign up for her deal then that's it.
 
Isn't that, essentially, what Cameron did and everyone hates him for it?
Yeah.

Might as well just back the Kyle-Wilson amendment and announce she'll step down at the result, at least she'd leave with a resolution.
 
I’m no politician. But could it be that the politicians are just dragging this out to make more money?