DWelbz19
Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2012
- Messages
- 35,437
... Because he finally started getting game time.It all changed once Amad starting looking the part.
... Because he finally started getting game time.It all changed once Amad starting looking the part.
There was no intent to coax any sort of performance out of Amad though. Even in the Liverpool FA Cup game where Amad got the winner, he was brought on for a token few minutes as it appeared we were heading out prior to Antony's late equaliser. Half jokingly, I bet ten Hag was a little concerned that Amad was going to have to play half an hour of extra time.It all changed once Amad starting looking the part.
Nah, he has been fairly consistent in his performances. Was consistent for an entire season at Sunderland. He just doesn`t seem like a Martial or Rashford who were/are wildly inconsistent with their performances.Sorry to be a twat but I'm calling it now:
He'll start against Fulham, play poorly, and then be relegated to the bench again for weeks on end.
Y’all are huffing fumes if you think Ten Hag is going to drop this guy and go with Antony once the season starts. The lad is legit, big season ahead for him.
This version is improved, yes. But the version he got was even then far superior to what he had at his disposal, so I'm not even sure he would have played him as he seemed to prefer raw pace and power.Me too.
Unless of course you think he wouldn’t have loved this version of Amad in his team.
Any player can have a bad game though, and there is a lingering concern that he may not be given as much patience as the others. That said, EtH has shown he afford his preferred starters a fair bit of patience, so if he now views Amad as one of those, he may enjoy some of that patience that Antony and Rashford enjoyed himselfNah, he has been fairly consistent in his performances. Was consistent for an entire season at Sunderland. He just doesn`t seem like a Martial or Rashford who were/are wildly inconsistent with their performances.
Not sure when exactly you felt he started looking the part but surely you'd agree he has comfortably looked better than Forson in every one of his performances.It all changed once Amad starting looking the part.
Aye, Ten Hag has dropped Antony for just about everyone at this point, it's definitely Amad's spot for the time being.Y’all are huffing fumes if you think Ten Hag is going to drop this guy and go with Antony once the season starts. The lad is legit, big season ahead for him.
Baller.
Big season coming for him.
I just hope EtG does not go with his tried and tested method of
Hojlund
Rashford. Bruno. Garnacho
Amad needs to be given chance at RW and let Rashford and Garna battle it out on the LW, and I think it's ok for Amad to compete with Garna on the right as well but Amad is the more natural option of inside RW being left footed
Not sure when exactly you felt he started looking the part but surely you'd agree he has comfortably looked better than Forson in every one of his performances.
Thus, the only reason I can fathom for Forson playing ahead of him was that he was being carefully managed due to the long injury lay off.
If it was about performance levels, it made little sense. If I remember correctly, Forson was chosen ahead of him even after his FA Cup heroics.
1, 2, 3, 100 minutes, the point remains that during a certain period (it wasn't one game), he did get selected ahead of Amad though. Also, the Premier League wasn't the only competition we played inOnce again, Forsen played a grand total of 68 Premier League minutes so the idea he was being given Amad’s game time is a bit of a daft one.
Yea, he came well into it towards the end of last season, but he looks quicker and sharper now, and more decisive. He has used the summer very well indeed.Looks a yard quicker than before and his close control is excellent
1, 2, 3, 100 minutes, the point remains that during a certain period (it wasn't one game), he did get selected ahead of Amad though. Also, the Premier League wasn't the only competition we played in
Once again, Forsen played a grand total of 68 Premier League minutes so the idea he was being given Amad’s game time is a bit of a daft one.
Amad had a tricky time with injury, then had a couple of inconsistent performances after getting a sniff at the first team. After the Liverpool game he’s been excellent pretty much every time he stepped on the pitch, ending the season as a deserved starter on his own merits.
I had the misfortune of watching forsen play against Fulham, one of the worst players I have ever seen play for us, he was totally out of his depth. Felt sorry for him.
No, it depends on whether the judgement of the said coach is not biased; it's entirely possible, though admittedly not factual, that coaches held him back in order to advance their own cases for desired signings - Ole pursued Sancho for two summers, having a young upcoming RW playing and displaying his potential within the squad would have seen his calls for a major signing in the role shut down. ETH overspent on Antony and whenever an argument about his stay here will be made this signing will always be a black mark on his record and simply wanted to give him as much a chance to be the player he thought he was buying as possible, and this will inevitably be at the expense of players like Amad.Not for me, when players are ready they prove it in training and simply cannot be ignored as so many fans like to claim.
Be it 15 yr old Yamal, or 17 year old Giggs, Greenwood, Mainoo etc.
If a player is standing out in training amongst first team peers, managers don’t simply ignore them because they “like someone else”.
Amad appears to have gotten exactly the loan he required, in a perfect league to prove himself and come back a “man” who is ready for top level football.
I don't have stats to back this up so could be way off, but it seems like wingers are so unreliable/dependent on pace that you'd be better off just spending huge on other positions and buying wingers for medium to low prices and accepting some churn at that position.
There’s literally evidence that this isn’t true. Just go back and look at the minutes he got once healthy last season.It all changed once Amad starting looking the part.
There’s literally evidence that this isn’t true. Just go back and look at the minutes he got once healthy last season.
As far back as 2021.At what point do you think he started looking the part?
As in, someone who can be a stand out starter for Manchester United.
As far back as 2021.
Sure mate.
Finally, a baller.
Been under our nose for years, just took us so long and a big slice of luck to stumble upon him.
The point is he’s been showing quality in a Utd shirt since 2021? Solskjaer shafted him, Rangnick didn’t give him a sniff and Ten Hag has only just come to his senses.Elanga scored a much better and more important goal vs. PSG… your point?
Don’t think that’s true at all, we paid big money for this potential and sent him on loan to prepare him for this breakthrough.
The point is he’s been showing quality in a Utd shirt since 2021? Solskjaer shafted him, Rangnick didn’t give him a sniff and Ten Hag has only just come to his senses.
He was injured yes, but when he was fit he was on the bench getting limited minutes.
We are lucky he scored the goal versus Liverpool as after that he got more chances from ETH.
We weren’t “lucky”, that’s how Garnacho got his chance (and Rashford once upon a time), by earning it.
Prior to Liverpool Rashford and Garna actually had their only good run of form at the same time so minutes needed to be earned.
In those past threads you’ll find there’s a lot of complaining on why Dan James is getting all the game time over Amad, which was the case. He played 8 minutes of football after the Milan game, for 2 months until the end of the season, then he played in a May PL game involving the B team, where he got an assist.No, in 2021 the huge majority of fans thought he desperately needed a loan to prepare for top flight football, both physically and mentally. It’s all there in our past threads.