Suv666
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2016
- Messages
- 9,123
Nearly 400 new messages since I last clicked on this thread. Anything actually happened?
Sky Sports reporting we enquired for him but were told he's not for sale
Nearly 400 new messages since I last clicked on this thread. Anything actually happened?
Nearly 400 new messages since I last clicked on this thread. Anything actually happened?
So why stop at £60m? If he's the right player why not go up to £100m? Because there is such a thing as market value and that's determined by many factors, one of which is remaining contract length and what other players have gone for. Hummels being the perfect example, Bayern paid a fee that accounts also for the fact that they're Dortmund's biggest rivals, we're not, a "fair" price for him should be one that takes away that premium.Why not? How much someone else paid for another player is irrelevant. If we need and want a player, then the only quesion is how much is thatbplayer worth to us? If hes the right player, i don't care if we pay 10 million or 60 million.
If we end up paying more than bayern paid for hummels so what?
Well the only way we change that reputation is by being firm and only paying relatively fair market prices going forward. I would rather our club saved money by not overpaying for transfers. Money that could be spent elsewhere, maybe even cut ticket prices for fans, invest in the club etc.We don't have to pay it we can just by another player...only problem is that a player of similar quality and experience will probably cost double.
They aren't under obligation to sell him to us at a price we want. We could call their bluff and say no then if they change their stance later an become deperate to cash in the we could get him a cheaper price. Other clubs could become intrested at that point.
We have a history and reputation of high transfer fee's because a) we are Man Utd b) the money that comes into the premier league. Whether we pay £5m or £50m it doesn't really effect any of us.
We probably couldn't find someone else for less but nor should his contract situation not reflect in his price.In that case, we should only answer to three questions. Does he fill a need? Does he worth 38m€ or more? Can we find someone of the same quality for less?
Thanks for the update!Sky Sports reporting we enquired for him but were told he's not for sale
It is strange how they seem to prefer selling to Bayern. I dont get it but its their funeral. Only question is to ask how you are today?Yes. We agreed hes very good, but quite mentally fragile. We may have had a bid rejected. We all hate dortmund because they're small time and only bow to bayern.
Any questions?
Is the critical bit. When you want a player and know the parent club is likely to lose 3 of that level in one window, be the one to get the first or at best the second because they'll always fight tooth and nail not to lose all of them.I don't think it's anything personal against United. They either want more money or they don't want to sell anymore players this summer. Either way it's fair enough. We should have acted quicker before they sold Hummels and Gundogan.
Hummels being the perfect example, Bayern paid a fee that accounts also for the fact that they're Dortmund's biggest rivals, we're not, a "fair" price for him should be one that takes away that premium.
We probably couldn't find someone else for less but nor should his contract situation not reflect in his price.
Miki was far better than Hummes in the previous season. He's also less injury prone.Why should we pay what Bayern paid? Bayern are their biggest rivals, of course they should be paying a premium. You could argue that Hummels is the better player too and home grown. No way should we be paying the same fee.
I don't think it's anything personal against United. They either want more money or they don't want to sell anymore players this summer. Either way it's fair enough. We should have acted quicker before they sold Hummels and Gundogan.
His contract situation should be used as an haggling tool but it shouldn't be a determining point. If he is the best option we should pay what he is worth in normal circumstances.
But he's not Neymar.. He's not even RVP. We might as well pay the normal fee for Reus then.
The normal fee for Reus won't be 35m€-40m€ and he is injury prone.
But he's not Neymar.. He's not even RVP. We might as well pay the normal fee for Reus then.
I know but he's a better player. People on here will only end up moaning if we pay over the odds and he does not live up to the price.
Apart from being quick and two footed, anything else? Pedro's at his best when he is making runs in behind, Mkhitaryan's very high defensive stats suggest he's at his best running all over the gaff. Maybe more like Willian with a lot better stats.He's very Pedro-esque in his style of play.
Apart from being quick and two footed, anything else? Pedro's at his best when he is making runs in behind, Mkhitaryan's very high defensive stats suggest he's at his best running all over the gaff. Maybe more like Willian with a lot better stats.
Thanks for the update!
It is strange how they seem to prefer selling to Bayern. I dont get it but its their funeral. Only question is to ask how you are today?
I know but he's a better player. People on here will only end up moaning if we pay over the odds and he does not live up to the price.
I think so too, but Bugshot seems to want to make comparisons.I think that he is like Mkhitaryan.
I think so too, but Bugshot seems to want to make comparisons.
Thats all fine and agree and if we league winners we could say no on the point of principle but we are playing catchup and our need to buy is greater then theirs to sell. Name a player with simular ability that we could get cheaper. The only reason they 'may' sell him is that he is in the last year of his contract and that give some negotiation power. That is the same with ddg last season.So why stop at £60m? If he's the right player why not go up to £100m? Because there is such a thing as market value and that's determined by many factors, one of which is remaining contract length and what other players have gone for. Hummels being the p
Well the only way we change that reputation is by being firm and only paying relatively fair market prices going forward. I would rather our club saved money by not overpaying for transfers. Money that could be spent elsewhere, maybe even cut ticket prices for fans, invest in the club etc.
We probably couldn't find someone else for less but nor should his contract situation not reflect in his price.
It's one of the rare players who doesn't have a real equivalent, a little bit like Hamsik.
That's the kind of thinking that has got us into this mess.So why stop at £60m? If he's the right player why not go up to £100m? Because there is such a thing as market value and that's determined by many factors, one of which is remaining contract length and what other players have gone for. Hummels being the perfect example, Bayern paid a fee that accounts also for the fact that they're Dortmund's biggest rivals, we're not, a "fair" price for him should be one that takes away that premium.
Well the only way we change that reputation is by being firm and only paying relatively fair market prices going forward. I would rather our club saved money by not overpaying for transfers. Money that could be spent elsewhere, maybe even cut ticket prices for fans, invest in the club etc.
We probably couldn't find someone else for less but nor should his contract situation not reflect in his price.
We have to compensate for the fact that Dortmund make it a policy to not lose more than two key players a season.Why should we pay what Bayern paid? Bayern are their biggest rivals, of course they should be paying a premium. You could argue that Hummels is the better player too and home grown. No way should we be paying the same fee.
They are Bayern's feeder club, they have to ask 'em before gonna sell a player...
Quite tired. First baby was born on saturday
Then they're idiots. In a world where a very unproven martial costs 30 million, i would say this guy is worth as much. Remember, martial had only shown small glimpses before we bought him.
Not surprised they said no IF we only offered £20m - that's Troy Deeney level (now). Put a market rate bid in and we might get a different answer.
Offer them Januzaj on loan.....
The manner in which both carry the ball, the types of passes they make in the final thrid, both drift in early, the layoffs.Apart from being quick and two footed, anything else? Pedro's at his best when he is making runs in behind, Mkhitaryan's very high defensive stats suggest he's at his best running all over the gaff. Maybe more like Willian with a lot better stats.
Yeah that's a good point, looking at his past stats he's been performing pretty well for a while.I think he was probably a good player before he played in Dortmond's system otherwise they wouldn't have paid £23m for him in the first place.
@slig
I promise I'll stop comparing you to Anchan, may the Admins rest his blessed little mind, once you stop discrediting anything Bayern related whenever given the chance. Deal?