Henrikh Mkhitaryan | BVB confirm transfer

Henrikh Mkhitaryan - Do you want him for the reported €38m?


  • Total voters
    1,486
Status
Not open for further replies.
Nearly 400 new messages since I last clicked on this thread. Anything actually happened?

Yes. We agreed hes very good, but quite mentally fragile. We may have had a bid rejected. We all hate dortmund because they're small time and only bow to bayern.

Any questions?
 
I'm not convinced by him in truth. He seems to be the kind of player who when everything is going well is excellent, but has a very weak mentality when things aren't going perfectly. Moving to a new league he's bound to struggle at some point and he looks like the kind who's head would drop and he'd have to be mollycoddled into getting better performances out of him. I also question whether he'd be able to handle the pressure at a bigger club. The Germans may jump on this comment saying Dortmund are in the CL next season and better at the moment, but there is still a huge gap between a club who expect to finish second or third vs a club who expect to win.

You look at how he performed 14/15 when things weren't going well for Dortmund and I think that illustrates my point. Also even a quick glance at his statistics seem to suggest he is exceptionally up and down. This combined with the fact that the majority of ex-Dortmund player's seem underwhelm when at bigger clubs (Gotze, Kagawa, Sahin) makes me concerned.

We had a similar player in Nani who was excellent when things were going well, but who struggled when things weren't. We shipped him out for a few £m, so I'm not sure why we'd spend £30m on Mkhitaryan. Who knows though - maybe Jose feels he can bring the best out of him (if that's the case I'd tend to trust the manager).
 
Why not? How much someone else paid for another player is irrelevant. If we need and want a player, then the only quesion is how much is thatbplayer worth to us? If hes the right player, i don't care if we pay 10 million or 60 million.

If we end up paying more than bayern paid for hummels so what?
So why stop at £60m? If he's the right player why not go up to £100m? Because there is such a thing as market value and that's determined by many factors, one of which is remaining contract length and what other players have gone for. Hummels being the perfect example, Bayern paid a fee that accounts also for the fact that they're Dortmund's biggest rivals, we're not, a "fair" price for him should be one that takes away that premium.

We don't have to pay it we can just by another player...only problem is that a player of similar quality and experience will probably cost double.

They aren't under obligation to sell him to us at a price we want. We could call their bluff and say no then if they change their stance later an become deperate to cash in the we could get him a cheaper price. Other clubs could become intrested at that point.

We have a history and reputation of high transfer fee's because a) we are Man Utd b) the money that comes into the premier league. Whether we pay £5m or £50m it doesn't really effect any of us.
Well the only way we change that reputation is by being firm and only paying relatively fair market prices going forward. I would rather our club saved money by not overpaying for transfers. Money that could be spent elsewhere, maybe even cut ticket prices for fans, invest in the club etc.

In that case, we should only answer to three questions. Does he fill a need? Does he worth 38m€ or more? Can we find someone of the same quality for less?
We probably couldn't find someone else for less but nor should his contract situation not reflect in his price.
 
We shouldnt be hagglimg over a few millions. We need to bring him in for pre season, just offer 25-30m, Jose wants him and he fits him too.
 
They're happy to sell their best players to some of our rivals but as soon as we get involved they no longer want to sell their players.

:lol: okay.
 
They are Bayern's feeder club, they have to ask 'em before gonna sell a player...
 
I don't think it's anything personal against United. They either want more money or they don't want to sell anymore players this summer. Either way it's fair enough. We should have acted quicker before they sold Hummels and Gundogan.
 
Sky Sports reporting we enquired for him but were told he's not for sale
Thanks for the update!

Yes. We agreed hes very good, but quite mentally fragile. We may have had a bid rejected. We all hate dortmund because they're small time and only bow to bayern.

Any questions?
It is strange how they seem to prefer selling to Bayern. I dont get it but its their funeral. Only question is to ask how you are today?
 
I don't think it's anything personal against United. They either want more money or they don't want to sell anymore players this summer. Either way it's fair enough. We should have acted quicker before they sold Hummels and Gundogan.
Is the critical bit. When you want a player and know the parent club is likely to lose 3 of that level in one window, be the one to get the first or at best the second because they'll always fight tooth and nail not to lose all of them.
 
Hummels being the perfect example, Bayern paid a fee that accounts also for the fact that they're Dortmund's biggest rivals, we're not, a "fair" price for him should be one that takes away that premium.

I don't think us being Dortmund's rival played a big role for Hummels' transfer fee, it's more the fact that we needed a new CB and Hummels meets all the requirements. He is a top class defender, German and home-grown, and in today's market, with the competition we probably faced (at least City is in for a new CB as well), it is pretty hard to find someone like that.

I actually believe that there has been a deal between Dortmund and Bayern regarding the fees of the Hummels and Rode transfers – both players went for about €5m too much. And even though €33m is still much for a player with 1 year left on his contract I think it's a fair price.
 
We probably couldn't find someone else for less but nor should his contract situation not reflect in his price.

His contract situation should be used as an haggling tool but it shouldn't be a determining point. If he is the best option we should pay what he is worth in normal circumstances.
 
Why should we pay what Bayern paid? Bayern are their biggest rivals, of course they should be paying a premium. You could argue that Hummels is the better player too and home grown. No way should we be paying the same fee.
Miki was far better than Hummes in the previous season. He's also less injury prone.
 
I don't think it's anything personal against United. They either want more money or they don't want to sell anymore players this summer. Either way it's fair enough. We should have acted quicker before they sold Hummels and Gundogan.

Say that again after they sell Auba in a months time. Stop blaming the club on how we approach transfers. LVG said it before he left, we see a player.. We enquire.. Next thing you know that player is £20m more expensive or not for sale. It might be a nice negotiation tactic but at the end of the day we can't continuously get ripped off. We won't survive as a business. We need around 5 players this summer. We have to spend wisely.
 
His contract situation should be used as an haggling tool but it shouldn't be a determining point. If he is the best option we should pay what he is worth in normal circumstances.

But he's not Neymar.. He's not even RVP. We might as well pay the normal fee for Reus then.
 
But he's not Neymar.. He's not even RVP. We might as well pay the normal fee for Reus then.

The normal fee for Reus won't be 35m€-40m€ and he is injury prone.
 
The normal fee for Reus won't be 35m€-40m€ and he is injury prone.

I know but he's a better player. People on here will only end up moaning if we pay over the odds and he does not live up to the price.
 
But he's not Neymar.. He's not even RVP. We might as well pay the normal fee for Reus then.

Considering the season he had, 30 million pounds is a good price. It's hard to sign a better player for that money.

Also Reus normal fee would be double the price quoted for mkhi.
 
I know but he's a better player. People on here will only end up moaning if we pay over the odds and he does not live up to the price.

But that's the point 35m/40m isn't over the odds, it's exactly his worth.
 
@slig
I promise I'll stop comparing you to Anchan, may the Admins rest his blessed little mind, once you stop discrediting anything Bayern related whenever given the chance. Deal?
 
He's very Pedro-esque in his style of play.
Apart from being quick and two footed, anything else? Pedro's at his best when he is making runs in behind, Mkhitaryan's very high defensive stats suggest he's at his best running all over the gaff. Maybe more like Willian with a lot better stats.
 
Apart from being quick and two footed, anything else? Pedro's at his best when he is making runs in behind, Mkhitaryan's very high defensive stats suggest he's at his best running all over the gaff. Maybe more like Willian with a lot better stats.

I think that he is like Mkhitaryan.:)
 
Thanks for the update!


It is strange how they seem to prefer selling to Bayern. I dont get it but its their funeral. Only question is to ask how you are today?

Quite tired. First baby was born on saturday
I know but he's a better player. People on here will only end up moaning if we pay over the odds and he does not live up to the price.

Then they're idiots. In a world where a very unproven martial costs 30 million, i would say this guy is worth as much. Remember, martial had only shown small glimpses before we bought him.
 
So why stop at £60m? If he's the right player why not go up to £100m? Because there is such a thing as market value and that's determined by many factors, one of which is remaining contract length and what other players have gone for. Hummels being the p
Well the only way we change that reputation is by being firm and only paying relatively fair market prices going forward. I would rather our club saved money by not overpaying for transfers. Money that could be spent elsewhere, maybe even cut ticket prices for fans, invest in the club etc.


We probably couldn't find someone else for less but nor should his contract situation not reflect in his price.
Thats all fine and agree and if we league winners we could say no on the point of principle but we are playing catchup and our need to buy is greater then theirs to sell. Name a player with simular ability that we could get cheaper. The only reason they 'may' sell him is that he is in the last year of his contract and that give some negotiation power. That is the same with ddg last season.

I think it's a little naive to think they will cut season ticket prices by not spuffing loads on transfer fee's . The only thing that will get them to cut that is not enough bums on seats.
 
So why stop at £60m? If he's the right player why not go up to £100m? Because there is such a thing as market value and that's determined by many factors, one of which is remaining contract length and what other players have gone for. Hummels being the perfect example, Bayern paid a fee that accounts also for the fact that they're Dortmund's biggest rivals, we're not, a "fair" price for him should be one that takes away that premium.


Well the only way we change that reputation is by being firm and only paying relatively fair market prices going forward. I would rather our club saved money by not overpaying for transfers. Money that could be spent elsewhere, maybe even cut ticket prices for fans, invest in the club etc.


We probably couldn't find someone else for less but nor should his contract situation not reflect in his price.
That's the kind of thinking that has got us into this mess.
Also, you say there is a premium for being Bayern Munchen, well, there is a premium for being Manchester United. They know we are loaded, and they'll demand the players worth in full from us. Your stance only works if there are equal quality for a better price elsewhere - which there doesn't seem likely to be.
 
Why should we pay what Bayern paid? Bayern are their biggest rivals, of course they should be paying a premium. You could argue that Hummels is the better player too and home grown. No way should we be paying the same fee.
We have to compensate for the fact that Dortmund make it a policy to not lose more than two key players a season.
 
They are Bayern's feeder club, they have to ask 'em before gonna sell a player...

Permission granted.
Worldclass fairweather player, he is. His first two seasons were underwhelming, until Tuchel finally made him click. Can't see him thrive under a do-or-die Manager like Mourinho.
If Dortmund are clever, they will just drive up his price a bit more, and ship him over to you guys. You have lotsa cash that needs proper burning, and Dortmund need room in their squad for all the promising signings they have already made.
After all, guys like Dembele need to be regular starters. Ribery and Robben don't get younger, so we need our feeds to arrive as mature as possible. Win-win-win, if you ask me.
 
Not surprised they said no IF we only offered £20m - that's Troy Deeney level (now). Put a market rate bid in and we might get a different answer.
 
Quite tired. First baby was born on saturday


Then they're idiots. In a world where a very unproven martial costs 30 million, i would say this guy is worth as much. Remember, martial had only shown small glimpses before we bought him.

He won't be worth as much as Martial as Martial's price was reflective of Monaco's hype in him. It was a very good deal as we basically said we believe you but will only pay you if he reaches his potential. So I wouldn't use him as an example. You want to use an example then I would mention RVP which we paid a premium for because he was off our rivals and considering his age. If you want to compare it to a German league player going abroad then look at Toni Kroos. His value should be €25 to €30 max.. I am happy with that anything over is us being ripped off regardless of what we would have to pay if he had more years on his contract.
 
Not surprised they said no IF we only offered £20m - that's Troy Deeney level (now). Put a market rate bid in and we might get a different answer.

Troy Deeney doesn't have a year left on his contract and plays in England. Further more is Troy Deeney worth £20m? NO.
 
Apart from being quick and two footed, anything else? Pedro's at his best when he is making runs in behind, Mkhitaryan's very high defensive stats suggest he's at his best running all over the gaff. Maybe more like Willian with a lot better stats.
The manner in which both carry the ball, the types of passes they make in the final thrid, both drift in early, the layoffs.

If he's on the field for Chelsea with Pedro's kit on, It'll be difficult for me to tell them apart.
 
Last season we scored 49 goals in the PL, horrible stats if you ask me. One of the first things Mou does is to address this problem and search for players who can improve our scoring ability.

United eight top scorers/ass 2015/16 in the PL

Martial 19(2) games 11 goals 4 ass
Rooney 27(1) games 8 goals 6 ass
Rashford 11 games 5 goals 2 ass
Lingard 19(6) games 4 goals 1 ass
Mata 34(4) games 6 goals 5 ass
Herrera 17(10) games 3 goals 2 ass
Fellaini 12(6) games 1 goal 0 ass
Young 11(7) games 1 goal 2 ass

Total 39 goals and 20 ass. Absolutely terrible numbers.

Eventually new players coming to United and their stats in their respective domestic league 2015/16

Ibrahimovic 29(2) games 38 goals 13 ass
Mhkitaryan 28(3) games 11 goals 15 ass

If both of them cost €35-45m in fees and increase our wage bill with 350-400k/week without taking into concideration outgoing players then this must be labeled excellent biz by Moun'Woo.

All of you who are against Mhiki and Zlatan find me two better options for a limited fee inside above numbers. In my world this is Mou creating gold out of beach sand. Apart from these two gems the only other attacking player who really attracts me, apart from non realistic targets, is either Mané or Marhez. Both insanely good and would fit perfect into out new attacking line with Mhiki behind.
 
@slig
I promise I'll stop comparing you to Anchan, may the Admins rest his blessed little mind, once you stop discrediting anything Bayern related whenever given the chance. Deal?

Hmm, if this is the condition, i have to say no.
Ok, i wont discrediting Bayern whenever a chance is given, but sometimes the truth has to be said.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.