the hea
Full Member
He seems like tailor made for the number 10 position in a Mourinho team. Hopefully we can convince Dortmund to let him leave.
I don't get this. The thing is, if he wasn't in his last year, they wouldn't sell even for 50, so now he is and 30 million is not outrageous.
I think you are referring to Martial in that aspect.He'd thrive in a similar role to what Hazard had in his POTY season under Mourinho.
The thing, though, is that the player is not for sale let alone on sale so the club has to offer a fee that gets Dortmund to the table. I suspect it will be done at 30m with the difference being made up in add-ons.You kind of answered your own question mate. You wouldn't see something on sale and offer half its original price because if it wasn't on sale it would cost twice as much.
I'm clearly not. I'm talking of a 10 playing as a free role wide attacker. In this case Henrikh operating at wide right if we sign him"RDCR07, post: 19349664, member: 45291"]I think you are referring to Martial in that aspect.
Besides it won't even be in the bank because we will spend it on some overrated kid from a B-rated league who isn't half as proven as Mkhitaryan and roll the dice hoping his is more Martial and less Memphis.£31M in the bank or Mkhitaryan in the team, it's a no contest, the Glazers earning interest on that money vs us having a top class forward in a team starved of creativity.
You kind of answered your own question mate. You wouldn't see something on sale and offer half its original price because if it wasn't on sale it would cost twice as much.
Besides it won't even be in the bank because we will spend it on some overrated kid from a B-rated league who isn't half as proven as Mkhitaryan and roll the dice hoping his is more Martial and less Memphis.
He is not on sale though. He still has a contract, and if they want they have every right to keep him and it's up to us to tempt them with what they deem a worthy offer. They're not idiots, they'll do what's best for them, but I'd rather we cough up the extra 5 million than end up without him. It's rare nowadays to have a player of such quality available at a sensible price (no matter the reason), so we should be all over it.
£31M in the bank or Mkhitaryan in the team, it's a no contest, the Glazers earning interest on that money vs us having a top class forward in a team starved of creativity.
He is not on sale though. He still has a contract, and if they want they have every right to keep him and it's up to us to tempt them with what they deem a worthy offer. They're not idiots, they'll do what's best for them, but I'd rather we cough up the extra 5 million than end up without him. It's rare nowadays to have a player of such quality available at a sensible price (no matter the reason), so we should be all over it.
Can't believe people still come out with this shite after the last couple of years...
Unless you're being sarcastic
Totally understand.. But football is a Bartering business, the only people to blame for the low price is Dortmund allowing his contract to run down to one year. No one has sympathy with us with De Gea where a arguably €60m player is now worth at most €40. I just think the value they want is not market value but if it's the sake of a few mill we will do it.
We will get our man. Hopefully the first of a few new attackers.
It would be pointless for BVB to turn down £25-30m when he will walk next year on a free.
That is for the market to decide. We just sold a defender with the same age and contract situation as Mkhitaryan for 38 Mil. €, so why should an offensive player with a better season not be measured at 40 Mil. €? Why should we not demand that kind of prize for a club which has the transfer history and finances like United? Of course we start negotiations that high, you guys have thrown out millions upon millions for far less players than Mkhitaryan and have a clear reputation of overspending massively at times over here in Germany.
I find that complain pretty amusing from an EPL club supporter as these clubs with United at the helm inflated the prizes on the market in the first place.
Offer them Januzaj on loan.....
That is for the market to decide. We just sold a defender with the same age and contract situation as Mkhitaryan for 38 Mil. €, so why should an offensive player with a better season not be measured at 40 Mil. €? Why should we not demand that kind of prize for a club which has the transfer history and finances like United? Of course we start negotiations that high, you guys have thrown out millions upon millions for far less players than Mkhitaryan and have a clear reputation of overspending massively at times over here in Germany.
I find that complain pretty amusing from an EPL club supporter as these clubs with United at the helm inflated the prizes on the market in the first place.
Offer them Januzaj on loan.....
Can you imagine the look on their faces when Woody offers just that.
We should send it as a threat.
If he would play in a shitty mood, i argue that wouldnt be good for him, for United, for Mourinho, cause then other players catch youre attention. We dont need the money, we need him to secure a CL-spot.
We did it with Lewandowski and this experience showed us that it a right decision. With him we secured a CL-spot which earns us money and the next future player.
Also dondt think that he will play shity in his last year. He and Tuchel understand each other well, why should a player play bad? We didnt forced him to sign his contract, you know what i mean?
Doesnt get why from one second to another everybody is hysterical about him. He plays for us since 3 years, his skills where obvious. Now we selled Hummels and Gündogan, Watzke said that for this summer its enough. And then Woodward or who else comes around the corner and noticed that Micki was the best player in he Bundesliga and wants him now. Maybe he should check his "scouting-skills".... or be quicker next time.
Now its upon us. And for a change in Watzkes mind you have to pay for.
Another thing offtopic: Please stop this arrogant shit calling me the guy who was banned. I wrote my points down, from the begining, that only a mega-offer will bring Micki this summer to United. Dozens of posts after that are about to calling me the guy who was banned, or were arrogant posts about Dortmund is e feeder club of Buy€rn. Stop this. I just want to share opinions with you, here from a perspective which is closer to Dortmund than the persepctive from a United-fan. This can give you another perspectives or inside-views from the other party. Thanks.
That is for the market to decide. We just sold a defender with the same age and contract situation as Mkhitaryan for 38 Mil. €, so why should an offensive player with a better season not be measured at 40 Mil. €? Why should we not demand that kind of prize for a club which has the transfer history and finances like United? Of course we start negotiations that high, you guys have thrown out millions upon millions for far less players than Mkhitaryan and have a clear reputation of overspending massively at times over here in Germany.
I find that complain pretty amusing from an EPL club supporter as these clubs with United at the helm inflated the prizes on the market in the first place.
Why? They've done exactly that before.
it's no news, it more of a commentary on how players are regarding their contracts nowadays, and how mkhhitaryan should be a wee bit more grateful due to dortmund having put trust in him even in times of underachieving on his part and bla bla.http://www.ruhrnachrichten.de/sport...ag-beinhaltet-auch-Pflichten;art11635,3042582
Anyone translate this?? This is the latest news from most reliable dortmund newspaper.
Anyone?http://www.ruhrnachrichten.de/sport...ag-beinhaltet-auch-Pflichten;art11635,3042582
Anyone translate this?? This is the latest news from most reliable dortmund newspaper.
Like they say in the East when one hand has something the other hand wants it will be a Happy Ending.
With the lyrics to 'I am what I am' written down the shaft in felt tip? Samesies.i have the weirdest boner right now.
Reus is out untill 2017?
Yikes.