Mate, you really have to learn to detect irony and sarcasm.I have been saying this all the time. I always mention it whenever I'm having a debate with mates in the pub when they say Odengaard or KDB. I do be whinding them up, though! Don't actually think he's better than them but I use it as ammo. I'm only on this forum a few weeks (reading for years on and off) so you may or may not have seen me post about that before.
That always comes up about him. Does when I'm chatting to people anyway. He has given the ball away a lot, I won't argue against that. My point is he clearly is our main player for creating chances. Chances aren't taken many times from his passes but that's not Bruno's fault. When he was subbed off against Brighton, the whole team fell apart. We stopped playing football. I don't understand why people say he has no influence.
According to this statement, you either don't read correctly or don't understand the main point of such arguments. I mean, at some point it really starts to look weird on you to pull that strawman on a regular basis in debates - many times, people have explained, that it isn't about having 86% against 82%, it is about his risk management - people are fine when only 50% of his passes in the final third come off, but 80% in buildup can cause problems and increase pressure on our own team.Incidentally, his chance creation stats have been really poor in the first 3 games. But his pass completion is higher than Ødegaard and Palmer's, so according to some that must mean that he's good now
It isn't that hard to comprehend, if you don't agree, thats fine. But it is tedious to see that argument misrepresented all the time.