UnofficialDevil
Anti Scottish and Preoccupied with Donkeys.
That explains it, I guess. Play once in the CL have a good game you get on that list.It helps when you never play in the CL.
That explains it, I guess. Play once in the CL have a good game you get on that list.It helps when you never play in the CL.
Bruno is a great player when played in his right position.
I really do not understand why we see him running around at the front of our press, he is absolutely wasted doing that.
I do not believe for one second he is doing it because he lacks positional discipline, he is too good of a player to do this, the only conclusion is that the manager has told him to do it.
If that is the case then the manager deserves all the grief that comes his way because he is wasting our best player.
Where do you think his right position is?
I'm not OP but he should not be higher on the pitch than Garnacho or Rashford, which for some strange reason we are seeing.
Under Ole he was deep and passing to empty grass ahead for Rashford and our attack to beat the offside trap, he is so much better with time and space. You can probably see in our heat maps, we are so disjointed at the moment with him all over the place taking over the CF role. I hope with some better understanding of Zirkzee and Rasmus back things get better.
I agree with you. I think he's playing higher because Ten Hag might be showing more trust in the defence and obviously to try create more goals which we are lacking of. Not the most ideal situation but I'd say that's his thinking.I'm not OP but he should not be higher on the pitch than Garnacho or Rashford, which for some strange reason we are seeing.
Under Ole he was deep and passing to empty grass ahead for Rashford and our attack to beat the offside trap, he is so much better with time and space. You can probably see in our heat maps, we are so disjointed at the moment with him all over the place taking over the CF role. I hope with some better understanding of Zirkzee and Rasmus back things get better. In the opening games with Mount he actually looked the weakest.
Don't like that at all. Place him on the right wing in some games or situations, not like competition is too great there. But don't put him in CM. I have absolute no idea what you could mean by him helping to maintain more control. I mean, this thread (and his predecessors) are full of (partially surely debatable) praise for him but I am not sure whether I actually read somebody talk about him helping to control anything.I wish Ten Hag would deploy him as a right-sided central midfielder. This would allow him to make better use of his excellent crossing ability from the right whilst also playing deeper, helping to maintain more control in games and providing additional bodies in midfield.
Don't like that at all. Place him on the right wing in some games or situations, not like competition is too great there. But don't put him in CM. I have absolute no idea what you could mean by him helping to maintain more control. I mean, this thread (and his predecessors) are full of (partially surely debatable) praise for him but I am not sure whether I actually read somebody talk about him helping to control anything.
The reason stuff isn't really working aren't related to him being in that false 10 role. It could work but the combination of his positional (in-)discipline, our "supposed" freedom and the not existing relationships between the players leading to us drowning in our fluidity sometimes. It is the right thing to do but with players not used to it it will take time to come off. The last thing we should do is talking ourselves into anything close to the illusion that he should be a CM. He can be a fine player. But play him where he does his best work, far from our own goal and preferably from our buildup.
He doesn't control games because he has great long passing. Against high line defenses, he could be great and a great weapon offensively, but it also comes at a cost because he isn't a CM, and we could be exposed playing him deeper. He is a 10, should only play there because that's where he is best. Even his own words.The idea that Bruno lacks the ability to control games is ridiculous. The only reason people believe this is because, under both Ole and Ten Hag, he’s been played almost as a second striker. However, whenever he’s operated in a deeper role, it’s clear he absolutely has the ability to control games. In fact, when Ten Hag bought Mason Mount, I assumed it was because he planned to use Bruno as an 8, with Mount in the 10 role.
As I’ve mentioned before, I’d argue Bruno’s best performances have come when he’s played deeper, allowing him to drop back and use his long passing to unlock defenses.
On paper, a midfield trio of Mainoo (left), Ugarte (centre), and Bruno (right) would provide fantastic balance, although I'd prefer our 6 to be a better passer of the ball.
100% Agree. I think he would be so much better as an attacking 8 from the right than a 10/SS.I wish Ten Hag would deploy him as a right-sided central midfielder. This would allow him to make better use of his excellent crossing ability from the right whilst also playing deeper, helping to maintain more control in games and providing additional bodies in midfield.
Can only repeat, I have next to no clue how somebody could come to this conclusion but fair enough. I also didn't say he lacks the ability to control games, I said his strengths lie somewhere else so we should make use of that not trying to force a very good 10ish player into a CM role.The idea that Bruno lacks the ability to control games is ridiculous. The only reason people believe this is because, under both Ole and Ten Hag, he’s been played almost as a second striker. However, whenever he’s operated in a deeper role, it’s clear he absolutely has the ability to control games. In fact, when Ten Hag bought Mason Mount, I assumed it was because he planned to use Bruno as an 8, with Mount in the 10 role.
As I’ve mentioned before, I’d argue Bruno’s best performances have come when he’s played deeper, allowing him to drop back and use his long passing to unlock defenses.
On paper, a midfield trio of Mainoo (left), Ugarte (centre), and Bruno (right) would provide fantastic balance, although I'd prefer our 6 to be a better passer of the ball.
Every time I speak to people going to the game and even when I watch I ask "what was his position"Where do you think his right position is?
Left back.Where do you think his right position is?
The completely free role. A second striker with no positional discipline, two dedicated midfielders behind him. If you indulge in him like that, you get a 20+ G/A second striker*. It’s just at the cost of playing a very specific type of football, the results of which don't justify the means.Where do you think his right position is?
Yes and there was a moment where he was at least a few yards away from the penalty box, he cuts in and shot on his left foot and smashes in front of the opposition player, I seriously don’t understand what makes him think that he has a high chance of scoring from that situation.Poor games and form happen, and hope he picks it up again.
Really wish he would stop waving his arms and complaining when others shoot. He takes the most pointless shots out of everyone and he’s our captain
Under ETH, that's never gonna happen. One of the rare players whose place is guaranteedNeeds someone to challenge him for position, and it's not Mount.
In that case, he ironically deserves Mount not to play.Under ETH, that's never gonna happen. One of the rare players whose place is guaranteed