Drifter
American
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2004
- Messages
- 68,483
Noooo. Yeeaaaaaaah. What an embarrassment.
In case it passes (same as Benn did)Why the feck is Blackford removing his amendment. It's the one useful motion
Why the feck is Blackford removing his amendment. It's the one useful motion
How are they going to renegotiate a new withdrawal agreement? As I said all the amendments are pointless.
What do you mean how? By requesting the extension of A50 it was in his amendment text i believe.
What do you mean how? By requesting the extension of A50 it was in his amendment text i believe.
Yeah, I only meant he won as in he resisted the demands of the Vatican, he made loads of mistakes in general. I thought the Elizabethan age is generally regarded as pretty successful for England really, she was just a bit shit at propagating. Would I have the monasteries back though, owning half of England and dictating the politics of the day? Hell no, but again, it's just a pity he wasted the cash the way he did. A little part of me is saying we might be getting a bit off topic as well - but you started it.It was certainly no threat to the Vatican or the RCC.
I don't think he won either. His aim was to leave a dynasty that will last centuries. Instead the Tudor dynasty with his children as a traumatised Elisabeth preferred taking her own dynasty to the grave then give power to a man. Tudor left an England that was divided, which was a pariah in Europe and was left vulnerable to a crusade which actually happened. He could have lost more if that's what you mean (England might have become Spanish)
They can't extend for renegotiation, only for GE or referendum. And the other 27 agreeing.
Of course they can, the point of allowing it for a GE is a shift in terms. If May tries to renegotiate on the same red lines then yes they'll refuse but if she reaches out on a cross party basis to come up with something that will command a majority (if possible) they'll extend. That's the main point of the discussed july extension.
The direction of travel is for a better deal for them.
600 vs 24 on the amendment
Of course they can, the point of allowing it for a GE is a shift in terms. If May tries to renegotiate on the same red lines then yes they'll refuse but if she reaches out on a cross party basis to come up with something that will command a majority (if possible) they'll extend. That's the main point of the discussed july extension.
The direction of travel is for a better deal for them.
In the (unlikely) event of a no- deal, what happens to the small matter of the £39 thousand million pounds?
I feel like her resigning would leas to a full on apocalypse.Better not fecking resign.
And then what? She certainly cannot expect more favourable terms after this public humiliation.She's going to go back to the EU.
Yeah, I only meant he won as in he resisted the demands of the Vatican, he made loads of mistakes in general. I thought the Elizabethan age is generally regarded as pretty successful for England really, she was just a bit shit at propagating. Would I have the monasteries back though, owning half of England and dictating the politics of the day? Hell no, but again, it's just a pity he wasted the cash the way he did. A little part of me is saying we might be getting a bit off topic as well - but you started it.