Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
So a question for the British posters on here (almost all Remainers) - would you prefer that May’s deal gets approved or would you want it voted down? Accept the certainty of leaving but with the assurance of short term stability or take the risk on political deadlock which could result in the chaos of crashing out with no deal but does leave open the possibility that parliament might throw this intractable mess back to a second referendum?
It depends what it is. If it secures free trade, trade laws and reasonably free movement then its better than dropping off a cliff.
 
Thats one of the craziest reasons to vote in a referendum, surely the time to protest vote was in the General Election a year earlier. There must have been loads of others who voted for stupid reasons as well.

I remember the day after the referendum watching the news and they were asking people which way they voted and why. One guy said he voted leave because it was time for a change as he was sick of the Tories. Looked a bit puzzled when the reporter explained it wasn't a general election and the Tories will still be in Government.

:lol:
 
It was unthinkable that leave would win just like in the the Scottish indyref. Ther were both merely appeasement gestures to make the "rebels" and the SNP pipe down!

A lot of people didn't think it was that close and didn't vote, a lot voted in protest against the government and few voted "leave" for fun. The dawn of this has left those people horrified at the consequences and if there will ever be a re-run there will be a huge majority for remain.


That's why I put the most blame on the people that voted to leave .

Who votes for something you don't understand ?

Who votes a different way for fun or because they think it will keep muslims out ?

I'm aware a lot of protest votes too but even that to me is just mental either
 
I swear i've seen that statement or a differently worded version of it in here a million times already, and it makes less sense every time.

if you voted remain, and now the consequences of leave look even worse than they did before, then why the actual feck would you now think you should leave?

and what does "leave properly" even mean. at the time of the referendum nobody knew what way you'd "leave" so what exactly does leaving mean now?

As an ardent remainer I can easily understand the sentiment. I’m in NI where no deal will be catastrophic and it’s pretty much inevitable IMO due to various conflicting interests in parliament. I don’t think we “should leave” obviously but long accepted that it’s going to happen and that the British people have made their bed to suffer in.

A second referendum is in itself a cop out and just undermines the concept of referendums going forwards – You either believe in their democratic value or you don’t. Of course the Brexiters argued in bad faith with lies told at every turn – That’s traditionally how democracy works. I’d consider every Conservative electoral victory to be won on false pretences – But it’s not grounds for another election.

Then getting to the obvious point that no second referendum is a guarantee of a remain victory, the potentially violent backlash that could follow a remain victory from an already alienated demographic and you’ll see it’s not all straight forward. If a second referendum is also contested with lies from Brexiters, as it can only be – Is the solution to a second leave victory a third referendum? Truth is it wouldn't be a second referendum - It would be an ultimatum to the British public.

It is good to see the masks truly coming off today though – With this deal we’re finally hearing the sentiment that Northern Ireland shouldn’t be a priority anyways. That a hard border, economic collapse and return to the good old days would be preferable to compromise. Foster and the DUP would be thrown into the Irish Sea if this were a normal country – Whether you believe in the union or not she’s a traitor to the people she represents.
 
Yeah just the sheer amount of paperwork I imagine is required makes me dizzy. And as you say, how many people have the UK actually got who're experienced negotiating international trade deals? You'd reckon a lot of the work was carried out by EU people and quite a while ago as well.
Without knowing anything about trade deals I imagine countries negotiating with the UK in the beginning of a no deal scenario know full well that the UK need some bloody trade deals pronto. So that's your leverage right there.

Yep, its the equivilent of a huge supermarket chain having negotiated great deal terms with suppliers using their size as leverage, and then one shop breaking off and demanding the same preferential terms from those same suppliers. Not going to happen.
 
As an ardent remainer I can easily understand the sentiment. I’m in NI where no deal will be catastrophic and it’s pretty much inevitable IMO due to various conflicting interests in parliament. I don’t think we “should leave” obviously but long accepted that it’s going to happen and that the British people have made their bed to suffer in.

A second referendum is in itself a cop out and just undermines the concept of referendums going forwards – You either believe in their democratic value or you don’t. Of course the Brexiters argued in bad faith with lies told at every turn – That’s traditionally how democracy works. I’d consider every Conservative electoral victory to be won on false pretences – But it’s not grounds for another election.

Then getting to the obvious point that no second referendum is a guarantee of a remain victory, the potentially violent backlash that could follow a remain victory from an already alienated demographic and you’ll see it’s not all straight forward. If a second referendum is also contested with lies from Brexiters, as it can only be – Is the solution to a second leave victory a third referendum? Truth is it wouldn't be a second referendum - It would be an ultimatum to the British public.

It is good to see the masks truly coming off today though – With this deal we’re finally hearing the sentiment that Northern Ireland shouldn’t be a priority anyways. That a hard border, economic collapse and return to the good old days would be preferable to compromise. Foster and the DUP would be thrown into the Irish Sea if this were a normal country – Whether you believe in the union or not she’s a traitor to the people she represents.

Well said, I completely agree with you. You would hope that the next elections in NI would reflect the growing anger and outrage at how the DUP have played this but both you and I know that they will get voted in regardless.
 
Why are people here so confident that if there was a second vote, the previous vote would be overturned?
I don’t think it’s necessarily the confidence that it’ll be overturned, but rather the idea it would be a more conclusive acceptance.

The initial referendum was pretensed by criminal levels of misinformation, lies and feigned promises, so if there’s a possibility that a substantial number of those who voted leave now harbour regrets on account of feeling duped then they should be allowed to rectify that.

If the consensus is still to leave with all things considered then that’s fair enough and it should be honoured.
 
Won't surprise me if Brexiteers push for their own version of a second referendum.
Take this shit deal or leave without a deal.
 
Realistically? Decades. People who think that these agreements will just be tweaks of numbers and letters to the existing EU deals really underestimate the complexity of these deals. The terms have completely changed as the UK offers only a fraction of the buyers market and nowhere near as much in goods compared to the EU, both in variety and size.

The bureaucratic work alone to negotiate and work out this immense number of deals would be staggering and the UK lacks the manpower in each of the three democratic branches to pull that of in any decent amount of time unless they shoehorn it in which will leave the UK with very poor terms.

Well said, people have no idea what is involved and think they are just going to copy and paste the deals the EU already has. The work will be astronomical and the UK don't have the expertise and experience to do it.
Another case of we'll just carry on , not much will change. Ha! There's a big awakening approaching.

Also, people still ignoring the devastating effect a border with the slightest friction will cause.

Well they were warned but they're not listening.
 
Well said, people have no idea what is involved and think they are just going to copy and paste the deals the EU already has. The work will be astronomical and the UK don't have the expertise and experience to do it.
Another case of we'll just carry on , not much will change. Ha! There's a big awakening approaching.

Also, people still ignoring the devastating effect a border with the slightest friction will cause.

Well they were warned but they're not listening.
Easiest trade deal in history Paul, remember?
 
I get the bilateral trade deal benefit in theory. But the truth is that the deals with big economies will extract a high price. India is already talking about VISA free travel for its citizens. America has openly talked about opening our healthcare system. Nigeria (Africa's largest economy) have spoken about complete reconstruction of how the Home Office treat Nigerian citizens. I can testify to how crap it is. And lowering standards for Nigerian farm produce.
There's a fantasy that we can just walk up to countries, especially Commonwealth countries and say "give us a good deal".
I can't see how the deal we could sign could be better than the one we currently have. And I don't mean to say the deals we have in place are perfect. The EU is actually quite good at negotiating for its bloc.

I get the right wing argument. Another vote will probably unleash right wing populism like never before. But I don't think that's a good enough argument to pursue brexit at any cost. If Remain wins again, it's because some people have changed their minds. The fear of cnuts shouldn't mean we pandering to them.
It's all academic though cause I don't think there will be anitano referendum. Parliament will vote for May's deal.

I was going to ask you, since I retired two years ago I haven't been involved in the business but our biggest individual customer was in Nigeria and at that time Nigeria was facing massive problems with obtaining foreign currency and also banning the imports of many products so that they were manufactured locally. Do you know if the situation has changed?

By the way I'm reliably informed that the UK love foreigners so why should there be a problem with just a few right wing extremists?
 
I don’t think it’s necessarily the confidence that it’ll be overturned, but rather the idea it would be a more conclusive acceptance.

The initial referendum was pretensed by criminal levels of misinformation, lies and feigned promises, so if there’s a possibility that a substantial number of those who voted leave now harbour regrets on account of feeling duped then they should be allowed to rectify that.

If the consensus is still to leave with all things considered then that’s fair enough and it should be honoured.

That's a really optimistic assessment. A second referendum would probably push people to further extremes (for the Farages of the world, it's further evidence of elites ignoring the common man). And I expect that case is easier to make than a positive EU flag-draped "let's stay in" campaign. Very few people love the EU, but a lot definitely hate it.
 
That's a really optimistic assessment. A second referendum would probably push people to further extremes (for the Farages of the world, it's further evidence of elites ignoring the common man). And I expect that case is easier to make than a positive EU flag-draped "let's stay in" campaign. Very few people love the EU, but a lot definitely hate it.

The Farages of this world are the ones that lied openly to the common man in the first place.
 
I was going to ask you, since I retired two years ago I haven't been involved in the business but our biggest individual customer was in Nigeria and at that time Nigeria was facing massive problems with obtaining foreign currency and also banning the imports of many products so that they were manufactured locally. Do you know if the situation has changed?

By the way I'm reliably informed that the UK love foreigners so why should there be a problem with just a few right wing extremists?
The situation has eased. The economy is still in the shitter due to mismanagement (prejected growthgof 1.9% for the year) but a lot better than the dark days of 2015/2016.
The reason for the restriction was that, for years, Nigeria had supported its currency with the use of its foreign reserves. The price of oil made that somewhat manageable. When oil crashed in 2015, it became difficult. The country burnt through a third of it's reserves in a little over six months. The new government felt it had little choice but to change to a free float currency regime. The £ went from about ₦200 to ₦600 even more on the black market. So the government imposed currency restrictions and import controls. Around that period, it took my parents 3 months to purchase $10,000
Now the £ is about 450 Price of oil going back up has contributed to that. There are still some import controls, especially agricultural. Some capital controls are still in place as well. But these are mostly for individuals not businesses.
The sad part is a lot of business that depended on forex went bust during that period.
 
The situation has eased. The economy is still in the shitter due to mismanagement (prejected growthgof 1.9% for the year) but a lot better than the dark days of 2015/2016.
The reason for the restriction was that, for years, Nigeria had supported its currency with the use of its foreign reserves. The price of oil made that somewhat manageable. When oil crashed in 2015, it became difficult. The country burnt through a third of it's reserves in a little over six months. The new government felt it had little choice but to change to a free float currency regime. The £ went from about ₦200 to ₦600 even more on the black market. So the government imposed currency restrictions and import controls. Around that period, it took my parents 3 months to purchase $10,000
Now the £ is about 450 Price of oil going back up has contributed to that. There are still some import controls, especially agricultural. Some capital controls are still in place as well. But these are mostly for individuals not businesses.
The sad part is a lot of business that depended on forex went bust during that period.

Thanks for that. Glad to know it's improving. At that time we persuaded the owner (very rich) of the company we were dealing with (and probably still are) to give a personal guarantee to our bank in London in case the company was unable to pay due to a lack of currency.
 
Brexiteers on the deal: this is the wrong deal. It is a betreyal of the woll of the people.

Remainers on the deal: this the wrong deal, it is not as good as the deal we had before

Brexiteers on remainers: they need to shut up and accept the result.

Some serious hypocrisy to think only leavers can have a say
 
Brexiteers on the deal: this is the wrong deal. It is a betreyal of the woll of the people.

Remainers on the deal: this the wrong deal, it is not as good as the deal we had before

Brexiteers on remainers: they need to shut up and accept the result.

Some serious hypocrisy to think only leavers can have a say

I think the woll has been pulled over people's eyes.
 
I wouldn't be surprised.... Get this deal in place... Let may carry the blame ... Boot her out and install mogg or Johnson as leader then move to a Canada style deal

Does Canada have a land border with the EU? I think that is the vital difference.
 
Does Canada have a land border with the EU? I think that is the vital difference.
Do you honestly think JRM cares?

BORIS-JOHNSON-JACOB-REES-MOGG-CARICATURE-800x800.jpg
 
This thread has another couple of years to run... :boring:
at least - 2 years actually sounds pretty optimistic to me to negotiate a comprehensive trade deal
i think canada took 7 years?
and I think it took Russia 18 years to agree its WTO schedule - so yeah i suspect there are at least s few more years to go - even if we crashed out with No deal on 29th Marh Im pretty sure talks would start almost straight away about a new deal so staying in (if A50 eve allows that) will probably be the only way we dont have the protracted talks
 
Of course they will. What's been lost in discourse is that negotiations over future trade have yet to begin. That is where the real issues lie.
I agree that they will vote for it but the reason they are so scared is, the withdrawal agreement forms a basis for the future relationship. The government will deny this but everyone knows it will.
 
I agree that they will vote for it but the reason they are so scared is, the withdrawal agreement forms a basis for the future relationship. The government will deny this but everyone knows it will.
Of course it will. The ‘backstop’ is basically attractive enough to the EU as a permanent situation that they don’t have much incentive to give concessions on a bespoke free trade agreement.

The government has given a masterclass in terrible negotiating strategy. It began with triggering article 50 prematurely, which they just gave up without laying out the structure of the withdrawal negotiation first. The UK had huge power to be distributive and obstructive while still within the EU to push for what it wanted. As soon as they triggered Article 50, the EU had the upper hand. I mean, the UK could have just kept vetoing the EU budget until it won concessions.
 
Last edited:
I agree that they will vote for it but the reason they are so scared is, the withdrawal agreement forms a basis for the future relationship. The government will deny this but everyone knows it will.
I think the EU have categoricaly said that a Canada ++ style arrangement would remain on the table in the transition period though
they may vote it down anyway being confident enough that defeating the bill would force May out and a eurosceptic would win the conservative leadership - which seems very likely - there is of course though a small risk that they defeat May and rather than face a vote of confidence in the house she rolls the dice and calls a general election or 2nd referendum (uniikley I think)
but the risk free option is let her get the deal through then moan about it and oust her in the new year and get JRM, Boris or Davis in charge to drive the bus (with a 350m a week logo on the side) straight off the cliff
 
I think the EU have categoricaly said that a Canada ++ style arrangement would remain on the table in the transition period though
they may vote it down anyway being confident enough that defeating the bill would force May out and a eurosceptic would win the conservative leadership - which seems very likely - there is of course though a small risk that they defeat May and rather than face a vote of confidence in the house she rolls the dice and calls a general election or 2nd referendum (uniikley I think)
but the risk free option is let her get the deal through then moan about it and oust her in the new year and get JRM, Boris or Davis in charge to drive the bus (with a 350m a week logo on the side) straight off the cliff
Do you think the Canada ++ or whatever shit it's called can pass through parliament?
 
Do you think the Canada ++ or whatever shit it's called can pass through parliament?
Im not sure what can / cant to be honest - but I think if it was proposed by a conservative leader then you would probably get the vast majority of the conservatives vote for it - perhaps the odd one like ken clarke who wouldnt
DUP - Im genuinely not sure but they seem to be ver close to the ERG who propose such a deal so i guess there is a reasonable chance they would get on board
so probably it could as there would be a few labour leave people who i think would back it as well
 
Ahh Jesus, this whole farce is quite fecking funny :lol: :lol: :lol:.

Possibly the longest that a really particularly stupid idea has ever ran for.

Is it just pigshit ignorance and americanesque bleating on about "MUH SOVREIGNTY" that doesn't have this dead in the water yet?
 
Last edited: