Paul the Wolf
Former Score Predictions Comp Organiser (now out)
Britain might not have been part of the scheme but they have taken refugees at numbers higher than those quoted for all those countries with 10000 from Syria alone.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-43826163
On your other point. I would argue that its best to keep refugees as close to their homeland as possible and strive to give them the best conditions possible in their temporary homes until they can return home.
The streets being paved with gold in Europe invariably proves to be a myth for them for a variety of reasons.
But that was just that relocation scheme, other countries particularly western European countries have taken far more as a percentage of the population than the UK (not just the numbers in that list).
Regarding the Syrian/Iraq refugees they are/were very close to home as Turkey, Lebanon and Iran are the bordering countries, there's nowhere closer, but how are these countries supposed to cope with such a large volume of refugees.
As you say the UK took in 10000 Syrian refugees , how would they cope with millions?