Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
Great so despite all the grandstanding from the tories they've already given into the timetable. Tough negotiators

Was always going to happen to be fair i just dont understand why they pretended otherwise
 
Davis is an absolute liar and an incompetent bluster-filled fool. The thought of him as interim PM makes me despair. Where have all the competent people in this country run off to?
 
The times I've seen him on TV I've always thought nobody could be that smug and confident without actually having something massive to fall back on. But the emperor does not seem to be wearing any clothes.
 
Last edited:
No...The OP said specifically that the NHS would go ape-shit for non-EU medical staff because they would cost less.

I was explaining that is not true - all NHS staff get the same salary for the same job, irrespective of nationality.

As for the spivs and speculators....If you think they're worth more to society than Medical Professionals, then you and I have a different view of the sort of the society we want to live in.
You have the wrong idea. Non EU nationals are not entitled to most of the benefits so cost the govt a lot lot less than EU nationals. Especially in case of the nurses.
 
Great so despite all the grandstanding from the tories they've already given into the timetable. Tough negotiators

Was always going to happen to be fair i just dont understand why they pretended otherwise
Something about trade deficits and Prosecco.
 
Great so despite all the grandstanding from the tories they've already given into the timetable. Tough negotiators

Was always going to happen to be fair i just dont understand why they pretended otherwise

:lol:

You're the people in the matchday forums telling us were gonna lose before a ball is kicked.
 
Order of talks were always going to begin with immigrant rights, and the the rights of Brits abroad, and financial settlements etc.
Both sides accept that NOTHING is agreed until everything is agreed. So let the EU map out their intentions, and let them tell us what they want, and we'll tell them what they'll get.
 
:lol:

You're the people in the matchday forums telling us were gonna lose before a ball is kicked.

Are you seriously suggesting that Davis hasn't been going on about parallel talks ever since the result last year? Is that even a question?

Do Brexiteers have as much difficulty grasping reality as Trump?
 
Order of talks were always going to begin with immigrant rights, and the the rights of Brits abroad, and financial settlements etc.
Both sides accept that NOTHING is agreed until everything is agreed. So let the EU map out their intentions, and let them tell us what they want, and we'll tell them what they'll get.

What the hell are you on about he and the rest have been banging the drum we fundamentally disagreed with that approach for nearly a year now. That we wouldn't be held to divorce talks first.

In case thats too hard to grasp here's words from the man himself, saying we're now in a worse position

 
Are you seriously suggesting that Davis hasn't been going on about parallel talks ever since the result last year? Is that even a question?

Do Brexiteers have as much difficulty grasping reality as Trump?

Trade negotiations should start in October. That is absolutely fine.
It is obvious that most things have to be discussed in parallel, but there are some issues more important than trade.
 
What the hell are you on about he and the rest have been banging the drum we fundamentally disagreed with that approach for nearly a year now. That we wouldn't be held to divorce talks first.

In case thats too hard to grasp here's words from the man himself, saying we're now in a worse position



As I said, trade deals are supposed to start in October. With the extent of complexity leaving the customs union, that's pretty good.
 
The only problem is what the EU see as a fair deal and what the Brexiteers consider a fair (i.e. give us everything for nothing) deal are two very definitions of fair in this context.
 
Last edited:
Funny that, it's almost as if Project Fear is coming true.
 
If you think a warning on war and a warning on economics are exactly the same, I cannot help you, unfortunately.
 
LOL at the guardian readers here.
Trade discussions will obviously be important to both sides, because both sides want to end ecconomical uncertainty.
The British side didnt want to wait until the last minute to discuss trade. That isn't going to happen, it will begin in only 4 months. However, a lot of issues are intertwined, and so will be discussed in parallel. The fact that people can see capitulation during the first formal discussions, simply points to the fact they want our side to fail badly, and are looking for it.
To start discussions on a trade deal is a compromise on both sides, as the EU were moaning about it being a lot later in the process.
 
LOL at the guardian readers here.
Trade discussions will obviously be important to both sides, because both sides want to end ecconomical uncertainty.
The British side didnt want to wait until the last minute to discuss trade. That isn't going to happen, it will begin in only 4 months. However, a lot of issues are intertwined, and so will be discussed in parallel. The fact that people can see capitulation during the first formal discussions, simply points to the fact they want our side to fail badly, and are looking for it.
To start discussions on a trade deal is a compromise on both sides, as the EU were moaning about it being a lot later in the process.

Trade discussions will start out if the UK agrees to pay what the EU think its due. Unless that is agreed first then there will be no trade deal discussions. The discussions will either halt or they will be delayed stripping the UK from valuable time needed to seal a meaningful trade deal with its biggest market
 
Hammond has definitely broken rank this morning. Seeing blood he's quite clearly putting pressure on May/Davis et al, basically saying that anything different to the exact same terms would not be acceptable and damaging for the economy. May now has a Chancellor she cannot sack, effectively saying in public her government's position of "no deal is better than a bad deal" is shite.
 
Yet he wants out of the customs union and the single market. None of these politicians make sense. All he's doing is giving people sufficient time to take their money out of the UK in an orderly manner.
 
You have the wrong idea. Non EU nationals are not entitled to most of the benefits so cost the govt a lot lot less than EU nationals. Especially in case of the nurses.

Sorry man, but you gotta explain this @AshfordLad ? How does a Turkish nurse working in the UK, on the same salary as a Swedish nurse working in the UK, cost the government a lot lot less? :confused:
 
Last edited:
:lol: What a mess.
Hammond not mincing his words.
May has lost control.
Cabinet has gone to the dogs.
 
Pound taken another dive.
More expensive to send money to my parents.:(
 
I think he's implying non-EU people are not entitled to the same state benefits such as childcare and all those.