The Breidiots can't win in their own court let alone get a good deal in Brussels. That's another thing that David Dumby Davies hasn't taken in consideration
Brexited | the worst threads live the longest
- Thread starter Silva
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) and Imran (@Annihilate Now!) are here to discuss Amad saving our blushes in a win against Southampton as well as our now annual loss at home to Brighton. They discuss Amorim's post-match comments, revisit how mid-table we may or may not be, and discuss some transfer news.
I can see SNP and Lib MP's on a matter of principal voting against the government - I can also see Labour probably having some massive infighting and comrade clusterfek managing to turn it into a massive own goal but them still finding a specific point they can disagree with the government enough to vote against it - not in principal but in practice... I can see the situation in Northern Ireland being one where they dont feel there is enough gsafeguarding in place and voting against - it come down to if enough of the London Conservative MP's will tow the party line - and remember brexit was not popular in London...
Some fudge will happen and it will get through - but it probably wont be as quick as the government would like... not sure it will lead to an election but of I was May I think thats the sensible call - given the state of labour she would walk a workable majority - it would give her a more credible mandate and it would allow her 5 years to sort it out as the timeline at the moment is tight and you will either get another election not long after brexit or if the article 50 negotiations take too long then possibly in the middle of it.
But will MPs really vote against their constituents?This sovereign parliament is dominated by Remainer MPs who haven't given a damn about the views of their constituents for years. I have no doubt, none whatsoever, they they will seek to harm our negotiating position and dilute Brexit. Every piece of delaying they enact will only worsen the uncertainty which exists. I don't even want to think about my Hargreaves Lansdown account at this moment.
I was unsure about the wisdom of general election before, but this ruling has prompted me to reconsider such.
Yeah and british people voted him in and created this farce we are seeing now
May is looking less like Thatcher and more like the evil witch of the West whose surrounded by her flying monkeys
I agree, think they will probably squeeze it past. Labour isnt united enough to get its act together and will probably be split. Bolded bit is so true.
I'm convinced that you are Juncker.
Lots of childish insults in here today
Agree. We should stick to facts and exposing people's hypocritical opinions in an adult way.
coming from someone who keeps calling remainers - 'remoaners'
When it coems to EU related matters in particular, where is the historical basis to trust Remainer MPs?
Let us suppose that Yes had won the Indy referendum in 2014, and a court then told Scotland that unionist Westminster MPs had the power whittle down the outcome to a lesser status of autonomy, would that be received well?
Last edited:
Apparently so, chief:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/...ty-campaign-starts-today-see-it-say-it-sorted
That poster's a bit too reminiscent of Nazi propaganda for my liking.
I wonder who voted that remainer MP
Do you really believe that the EU will take these idiots seriously?
They don't take France seriously, so they are definitely not going to take the UK seriously after that. Also it confirms the suspicion that a lot of continentals had for a long time that the UK were purposely working against the EU and continental Europe in general.
Are your investments in foreign currencies? Does that explain why you're not bothered about the fall in the pound/ effects of a hard Brexit?This sovereign parliament is dominated by Remainer MPs who haven't given a damn about the views of their constituents for years. I have no doubt, none whatsoever, they they will seek to harm our negotiating position and dilute Brexit. Every piece of delaying they enact will only worsen the uncertainty which exists. I don't even want to think about my Hargreaves Lansdown account at this moment.
I was unsure about the wisdom of general election before, but this ruling has prompted me to reconsider such.
Where's the historical basis to trust any MP? Why would they suddenly be trustworthy after Brexit?
Why in your analogy is the court a 'unionist' court and not a Scottish court? This wasn't the decision of a European Court (although the hilarious possibility of the government appealing to a European Court for permission to ignore Parliament is still tantalisingly on the cards) but a UK one.
I think that they take France more seriously then these pack of amateurs who went kicking a hornet's nest while hoping that lovely puppies will come out instead. Look at them. Most of them have resigned, had turned against one another or have vanished in obscurity. Farage had even been spotted in the German embassy while working on his second passport while a remainer PM have given the task to clean the mess the leavers had created with their lies. The EU will leave them to flounder in darkness only to offer them a take it or leave it deal which will be heavily stacked towards the EU.
Regarding your last part. Its a known thing. Even the Brits admit that and joke about it. A unified and strong Europe was never in the UK best interest
Last edited:
Kussenberg just suggested May should call an emergency vote ASAP on article 50
Probably a sensible shout before labour can agree a unified (or as unified as they can manage these days) stance
Probably a sensible shout before labour can agree a unified (or as unified as they can manage these days) stance
I am convinced that the European commission, UKIP and Boris are all running accounts that post here.....
- "It's not about foreigners, it's about sovereignty"
- British judges make decision that Britain's elected parliament must vote on Article 50 in accordance with British law.
- British judges make decision that Britain's elected parliament must vote on Article 50 in accordance with British law.
its undeniable that ignorance (including xenophobia) had been a driving force to Brexit. There again when I use Breidiots Im referring to the Brexit politicians who had been showing, time and time again, that they have no clue of how the world around them works. I mean how can you call someone who think that its possible to make a deal with individual EU countries or the other guy who think that's a jumbo deal with Turkey is possible when the latter country is in the custom's union?
It does look like it.
But I think that the reality is that despite all the talks about EU citizens not caring about the EU, whether we are against or for the EU, we care a lot.
Would be hilarious if they the government had to refer this judgement to the European Courts
It would yet another case of remainers sorting the problems caused by irresponsible Brexiteers
These tweets are crazy, I don't know a single democracy that doesn't require the vote of the parliament when it comes to international treaties and most of the time the qualified majority is used.
You're talking about people who thought possible to conclude trade deals with individual EU countries bypassing the EU commission completely. They don't have a clue of what they are doing
Are your investments in foreign currencies? Does that explain why you're not bothered about the fall in the pound/ effects of a hard Brexit?
The majority are British at this time. However i've stated since the outset that i was prepared to accept a personal economic cost in the pursuit of Breixit. Petty manoeuvring by MPs who would gladly bring down the entire Brexit process, now stands to exacerbate all of our difficulties.
of course. Just look at the USA and the influence of congress on these matters...
There's something beautiful about all the people shouting about 'taking our country back' now complaining about your parliament's sovereignty.
How dare a democratically elected commons, who we vote for in order to make decisions and choices on our behalf, get oversight on the biggest constitutional change (on which no vote has taken place) to the country in recent times.
'Unelected judges' is a rather bewildering and frankly worrying complaint to make.
This is going so well
Cameron is probably hoping that people concentrate on the pig head fecking thing to distract from his more embarrassing screw ups.
Cameron is probably hoping that people concentrate on the pig head fecking thing to distract from his more embarrassing screw ups.
After reading a couple of articles it just sounds like a timing issue bundled into this whole thing. Can't imagine and hope MPs wouldn't vote against Brexit now.
like the woman banging on about sacking judges (presumably because they arrived a a decision she does not like)... and this is a woman standing for leadership of a major UK political party
That's exactly what I thought, I can't really believe that something like that has been produced.