At a guess I’d say you’ll just pay more for that “pleasure”Will still be able to get a KFC after Brexit or will have to go to Burger King?
At a guess I’d say you’ll just pay more for that “pleasure”Will still be able to get a KFC after Brexit or will have to go to Burger King?
I'll have it my wayAt a guess I’d say you’ll just pay more for that “pleasure”
That's already the situation isn't it, with the quarantine? I know we got back here in October and not long after the UK brought in quarantine for people from Italy. We can probably cut the quarantine short by having a private Covid test just before we travel.
You're right about it being a "meh" thing now in other countries. They're not bothered, it's a British problem.
Chapter 18 - Good regulatory practices and regulatory cooperation (page 463) should sort you out. Hint:
There is a fourth option that we tend to ignore. Both sides have reasonable but diverging interests.
No, it's not arbitration as it's all completely non-binding.I started reading and ending up reading anoter 30 odd pages and still didn't get there. But basically it's down to arbitration but there's a degree of trust between the EU and Japan.
Clearly Boris evaporated any trust with the IMB and I personally wouldn't trust Boris to walk my dog, and I don't even have a dog.
https://www.tjm.org.uk/documents/br...t-and-Regulatory-Cooperation-after-Brexit.pdfA Free Trade Agreement that builds on the CETA and JEFTA models
CETA and JEFTA are two comprehensive FTAs that the EU has agreed with third countries (Canada and Japan respectively) in the past two years. They serve as a model for the kind of trade deals the EU is willing to sign with ‘third countries’ – countries which are not in the Single Market or in the EU. Both these deals fall far short of Single Market participation or shared customs arrangements, but nonetheless they are still more comprehensive than older trade agreements in the commitments expected of countries that are a party to them, both in terms of coverage (the number of policy areas that are impacted), and the level of liberalisation required (the number of sectors that will be opened to competition from the other party).
CETA is one of the first deals to include a specific chapter on Regulatory Cooperation, modelled on the Regulatory Cooperation chapter that was proposed for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP – a deal between the EU and the US, abandoned in 2018). The chapter sets out a process of dialogue between Canada and the EU to address regulatory barriers to trade, most of which takes place through a Regulatory Cooperation Forum. This brings together ‘trade experts’ and political leaders from both sides, with, as legal professor Marija Bartl explains, the aim of “creating institutional channels for the exchange of information, methodologies and knowledge between regulators and stakeholders... (so that) their ‘thinking’ would align, thus minimizing the numbers of divergent regulations.”
The FTAs currently in place that include Regulatory Cooperation processes (e.g. CETA and JEFTA) do not specify who should be invited to participate in these forums. However, because the main focus of Regulatory Cooperation is on removing barriers to trade, commentators have suggested that these forums are likely to be dominated by business interests. Civil society groups have argued that unless the treaty explicitly states that trade unions and other civil society groups must also be invited, the majority of the input will come from corporations. While the recommendations resulting from the Regulatory Cooperation processes are non-binding, they set in motion a method for addressing barriers to trade which departs significantly from the normal democratic process that sets regulations outside of trade agreements. Regulations are ordinarily designed with social, public health or environmental objectives in mind, even in trade blocs such as the EU’s Single Market. In the CETA model, the objective of the Regulatory Cooperation Forum is to facilitate trade rather than regulate in the public interest.
They will continue to do business with each other, just that everything becomes more complicated and expensive. The Uk will still sell its fish to the EU, the EU will still want the fish in UK's waters.
The UK will still have its sovereignty that it had in 1962 2002 and in 2022.
There have been a couple of classic examples in the last week or so.
The UK claiming it could approve the vaccine quicker because it had left the EU- only in name only they're still following the same EU rules until the end of this year. Latvia could have done the same.
Davis announcing that he could buy NZ wine instead of French when NZ's second biggest export to the UK already is wine and no.1 is lamb while it has been in the EU.
Brexiters have given the impression that the UK don't sell to or buy from other countries outside the EU and suddenly they can, this is one of the biggest lies swallowed by Brexiteers.
Liz Truss announcing she can sell stilton, cornish pasties and haggis to Japan tariff free - whoopee , nobody in Japan wants to buy it.
Very few people in the EU even care about Brexit any more, it's rarely in the news. The only thing about the UK we've seen this week is the old lady who was given the first vaccination.
The EU want to ensure that the UK don't benefit unfairly from leaving.
Not sure where you are seeing that tbh. The main thrust of public statements and media coverage for a bit now has been the 'don't back down on sovereignty' line.For you and I and other EU residents that means a compulsory 2 week quarantine
I'm in the UK and keep hearing how the EU needs a deal as much as we do and it's this big moment in European history. Seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding there. The EU no longer has any need to make any sacrifices. A deal is better than no deal, but newspapers make no mention of it and it's not a vote winner or loser anymore.
No, it's not arbitration as it's all completely non-binding.
https://www.tjm.org.uk/documents/br...t-and-Regulatory-Cooperation-after-Brexit.pdf
This report is worth reading in full at some point for a general understanding of the ways international trade interacts with domestic regulations and the trade-offs involved.
And most people I know cringe at the utterly stupid comments made by people who really should know better.
Just to mention that in my working life, I had the absolute pleasure and privilege of working with excellent engineers (jet engine) from Germany, Italy, France, Sweden and Spain. And in my experience, I had nothing but admiration for them and still keep in contact with many. I am I very firm believer in the concept of working together on an equal basis to achieve a common objective.
Brexit is 180 degrees opposed to this.
Yeaaaah the Australian style option so amazing that Australia don’t even want it.Australian-style option.
Free-trade agreement (Canada) vs default WTO terms (Australia).Obviously he’s talking out his arse but what does he mean by Australian vs Canadian options?
Obviously he’s talking out his arse but what does he mean by Australian vs Canadian options?
Obviously he’s talking out his arse but what does he mean by Australian vs Canadian options?
Free-trade agreement (Canada) vs default WTO terms (Australia).
Oven ready.Wasn't it Boris Johnson who said last year that the chances of a no deal were "million to one”
Wasn't it Boris Johnson who said last year that the chances of a no deal were "million to one”
They’ve become a nation of clappers.I can imagine him singing to the tune of War of the Worlds - the chances of not getting a trade deal are a million to one, but still there's none...
And his Cabinet Brexiteer supporters clapping like the demented idiots they are.
They’ve become a nation of clappers.
well I hope clapping puts the food on the table come the time when the economy starts seriously tanking next year
I can imagine him singing to the tune of War of the Worlds - the chances of not getting a trade deal are a million to one, but still there's none...
And his Cabinet Brexiteer supporters clapping like the demented idiots they are.
But we all knew this was coming.
Oh well, there's always next year when the country's on it's knees.
Exactly, but the pandemic provides a convenient cover for Brexit.The UK may possibly have coped with either Brexit or the pandemic. But both of them at the same time is going to be catastrophic.
fecking shameless. Indulged by certain sections of our media.Oven ready.
must be still in the freezer
Exactly, but the pandemic provides a convenient cover for Brexit.
"can't do this? oh it's the pandemic, not Brexit"
Supporters will grit their teeth and keep on waving their flags, I think they'll have to suffer a lot before the concede the Brexit was a bad idea.
It’s the accountability that does my head in the most. Why aren’t politicians held to account for anything? They can literally lie and millions lap it up. I can’t fathom itfecking shameless. Indulged by certain sections of our media.
Spouts off lies, and there is little accountability
It’s the accountability that does my head in the most. Why aren’t politicians held to account for anything? They can literally lie and millions lap it up. I can’t fathom it
I really hate the era of politics that we have gone through the last 5 years or so. Any feckin liar can rise to powerIts pathetic, its not hard to even ask the most basic of questions and do fecking research to show they are lying. Trumpian politics at their best.
I really hate the era of politics that we have gone through the last 5 years or so. Any feckin liar can rise to power
I find this kind tweets interesting because I assume that for many people it somehow makes sense, it takes more than a month to ship something port to port from the UK to Australia.