Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
Impressed with Starmer today, completely took apart Boris's deal and said it for what it was - a trap door to no deal.

Me too, a great speech that took the government's position on workers' protections apart.

If he was leader I think Labour would have a good chance at the next election.
 
Me too, a great speech that took the government's position on workers' protections apart.

If he was leader I think Labour would have a good chance at the next election.

Yes. Very much so.
 
Me too, a great speech that took the government's position on workers' protections apart.

If he was leader I think Labour would have a good chance at the next election.

He came up with Labours unicorns policy in the first place. I'm not against him being leader but people project a lot of their wishes onto him on the caf
 
What a mess. England should have a second referendum as it's clear things were not as simple as they originaly thought.
 
Can someone tell me ih short what the hell is happening?
Boris is writing a letter to ask for an extension (or he isn't)
Not writing the letter is illegal (or it isn't)
There will be court case (or there won't)
The EU will grant the extension (or they won't)
There will now be a vote on the deal on Monday (or there won't)
And the deal will pass (or it won't)
It will pass amended with a referendum attached (or it won't)
There will be a no confidence motion in Boris (or there won't)
Think that covers it up till tuesday
 
What a mess. England should have a second referendum as it's clear things were not as simple as they originaly thought.
I don't reckon many of the Leave voters care about the complexities. I'm sure some will have changed their minds, but I'd bet that the majority see it as a matter of principle now. They're not interested in the nuances, just the end result.
 
I’ve been at football this afternoon do not kept up to date but I see Boris is saying that he won’t be asking for an extension which, from what I can tell would be breaking the law?
 
Still trying to kick the can down the road to nowhere.
That “kick the can down the road”, is very much a Boris/Brexiteers slogan in the realm of “get brexit done” etc etc
I’m surprised you use it, it doesn’t sit well with me
 
Just england?... Hummm not sure that would solve much
The UK i meant, sorry.
I don't reckon many of the Leave voters care about the complexities. I'm sure some will have changed their minds, but I'd bet that the majority see it as a matter of principle now. They're not interested in the nuances, just the end result.
Maybe so. I view it as something that will have an impact for many, many years and with more information known a second referendum would be fair imo; if i was British that's what i'd want.
 
That “kick the can down the road”, is very much a Boris/Brexiteers slogan in the realm of “get brexit done” etc etc
I’m surprised you use it, it doesn’t sit well with me

Originally it was aimed at Theresa May a year or two back - now Johnson has used it.
But at some point parliament has got to decide on something.
 
What a mess. England should have a second referendum as it's clear things were not as simple as they originaly thought.

And that will solve what? Seriously? It will just create yet more mess. I voted remain but we can’t just have non stop referendums. We have to move on somehow.

Leave win again - will remainers stop their blocking and bleating?

Remain win - does it then become a best of 3? Or do we automatically think remains win is better than leaves?
 
And that will solve what? Seriously? It will just create yet more mess. I voted remain but we can’t just have non stop referendums. We have to move on somehow.

Leave win again - will remainers stop their blocking and bleating?

Remain win - does it then become a best of 3? Or do we automatically think remains win is better than leaves?
No, you don't keep having referendums. It's not a pool tournament so best of 3 doesn't really apply.

You have a last one, given that people now have some idea of what they're actually voting for and never, ever have such a massive decision taken on a critically important matter based on a vague and ill defined political stunt ever again.
 
No, you don't keep having referendums. It's not a pool tournament so best of 3 doesn't really apply.

You have a last one, given that people now have some idea of what they're actually voting for and never, ever have such a massive decision taken on a critically important matter based on a vague and ill defined political stunt ever again.

No doubt the result would be close and what? You think it will end this madness? Seriously? No way.
 
No doubt the result would be close and what? You think it will end this madness? Seriously? No way.
No it won't. The madness will not end and it predates Brexit which was a lightning rod. But it will, if designed correctly, decide this current deadlock.
 
I don't reckon many of the Leave voters care about the complexities. I'm sure some will have changed their minds, but I'd bet that the majority see it as a matter of principle now. They're not interested in the nuances, just the end result.

Just gerronwivit. Get it done.
 
No it won't. The madness will not end and it predates Brexit which was a lightning rod. But it will, if designed correctly, decide this current deadlock.

And how will it be designed correctly when both sides have withdrawn to their no deal / no Brexit trenches. Literally no one is trying to come to a respectable position and find a way to get it done.
 
After some reflection, I think today's vote on the Letwin Amendment changes nothing. Johnson, Bercow or someone else will send a letter to the EU either today or on Monday.

The EU will just sit on it. People don't understand the EU very well if they think they'll undermine the deal they just signed up to by offering an extension. They also gain nothing by interfering in domestic politics against Johnson, who's likely to be the leader of the biggest party and next PM after an election. The noises coming out of Brussels have always been that if a UK Govt signs up to a deal that respects their red lines they'll do what they can to help them sell it domestically. They want to focus minds in Westminster to vote for the deal the same as Johnson.

So what will happen is they will say they don't feel they have to respond to this request until after the Parliament has voted on the deal, because if it gets signed the extension is pointless. Meanwhile Macron will play the bad cop to Merkel's good cop, saying he might veto the extension as he's had enough etc. etc. simply to "focus minds" on Westminster to vote for the deal. But ultimately if the deal does get rejected, they will grant the extension (as they don't want no deal) and let us go to elections.

So like I said, I think it changes nothing.
 
After some reflection, I think today's vote on the Letwin Amendment changes nothing. Johnson, Bercow or someone else will send a letter to the EU either today or on Monday.

The EU will just sit on it. People don't understand the EU very well if they think they'll undermine the deal they just signed up to by offering an extension. They also gain nothing by interfering in domestic politics against Johnson, who's likely to be the leader of the biggest party and next PM after an election. The noises coming out of Brussels have always been that if a UK Govt signs up to a deal that respects their red lines they'll do what they can to help them sell it domestically. They want to focus minds in Westminster to vote for the deal the same as Johnson.

So what will happen is they will say they don't feel they have to respond to this request until after the Parliament has voted on the deal, because if it gets signed the extension is pointless. Meanwhile Macron will play the bad cop to Merkel's good cop, saying he might veto the extension as he's had enough etc. etc. simply to "focus minds" on Westminster to vote for the deal. But ultimately if the deal does get rejected, they will grant the extension (as they don't want no deal) and let us go to elections.

So like I said, I think it changes nothing.
I have always thought that the EU would pursue any agenda that they thought would result in a 2nd ref
 
And how will it be designed correctly when both sides have withdrawn to their no deal / no Brexit trenches. Literally no one is trying to come to a respectable position and find a way to get it done.
You're right. Let's just give up and succumb to the Johnson and Mogg "respectable" position. The vote has happened. No option now but plunge off a cliff as Ian Duncan Smith laughs maniacally.
In the same way the Benn act got through. Cross party Parliamentary consensus protecting the country from the extremes of the House.
 
Just seen on Sky News there that Reuters News Agency via EU Official are saying that the Extension Letter will be sent today

And...


I think he had no political future if he didn't
He can moan about it (and he will)... He can call it the surrender act and he will call those who voted for it traitors (and he will)
But ultimately there is going to be a general election and he can use this as ammunition for his parliament Vs the people narrative.

If he didn't send the letter he ran the risk of being impeached / arrested and potentially banned from standing as an MP

So logically if he wants power it's his only move
 
It may well not be....it’s an assumption that that’s the EU’s preferred result
I assume the EU would rather we stayed too on the premise that us leaving has no upside, other than being rid of an irritant in meetings. But maybe they're just sick of it all by now.