sun_tzu
The Art of Bore
Might get the w.a. through but will make the actual trade talks a lot tougher to manage... That said may probably won't be in power for that part of it so I'd guess she might throw government support behind this?
For all the many, many criticisms you can legitimately throw at May, you have to admire the size of her balls.
Though then you remember that if it all goes wrong, the little people suffer and she retires into obscurity to live out her days in comfort, her wealth presumably squirreled away offshore in various currencies. Its actually everyone else's future she is playing chicken with, not her own.
Still. Balls.
Probably, has to be confirmed.
Just saw this:
France, Spain and Belgium are ready to veto a Brexit extension, the Press Association understands. The PA report goes on:
Sources have said France, Spain, Belgium and maybe Italy stand prepared to reject an extension without evidence Parliament is now ready to accept a deal and “the deadlock can be broken”.
Some member states worry there is no point to an extension as, even after 1,000 days of negotiation, Theresa May’s deal keeps being rejected and the EU cannot move any further towards the UK.
One source said: “We’re not against an extension per se but we need to have two things - first a demonstration that the situation has changed and there is a guarantee the extension is for something and second that an extension won’t be detrimental to the EU.
“Yes, a no-deal Brexit would be damaging and it’s absolutely not what we want but I think we’re ready to go to this situation because there are only two solutions - either a deal is accepted or there is no deal.
“The deal has been rejected and it keeps being rejected so if we come to no-deal then so be it.”
It is understood French president Emmanuel Macron believes Brexit is holding up his plans for radical reform of the EU and needs to be brought to a conclusion.
Not call a vote on a deal that has been rejected twice already the week before leaving day with no extension on the table when you know perfectly well that no deal will spell catastrophe for the country.So, what do you think she would do if she didn't "have balls"? What was the "no-balls" option?
Not call a vote on a deal that has been rejected twice already the week before leaving day with no extension on the table when you know perfectly well that no deal will spell catastrophe for the country.
Yeah, you're right. About the first bit I mean. That would be braver.That's the "no-balls" choice? That's nothing.
After two years of failed negotiations, the "huge balls" decision would be to cancel article 50, call for new elections, and retire ... since she was incapable of finding a solution. What she is doing all this time is what any coward would be doing.
Her husband is a senior executive of an investment firm which manages nearly £1.5trn of investments. I think she will be ok in retirement.
Yes, I can see that, but a lot of our leavers believe that we're not the US, and we will have to trade with the EU and them with us, so let's 'clear the decks' with a 'no deal' if necessary and then come at it a fresh! In my experience, which I admit is limited, this view is getting stronger, not weaker, as a way to move past Brexit!
Yeah, you're right. About the first bit I mean. That would be braver.
I dont understand this. If MPs vote for May's deal there is no need for a referendum. And even if there was a referendum, why would we negotiate another deal with the EU (option C) if MPs backed May's deal?
What the feck is he doing with her.
I do strangely think history will treat her kindly. Took on the impossible job and despite what anyone said, she managed to get a deal on the table, which was considered the hardest bit of the negotiations. Regardless whether the MPs agreed with it or not, good or bad.Yeah I did acknowledge that in my post. All that is on the line is her reputation, now and through history, which I imagine is a big motivator for her. But you are right, it is hardly worrying about feeding your kids.
The most powerful lady in the country? Not sure. He's made an absolute fortune out of our arms deals in the middle east though.
What the feck is he doing with her.
I do strangely think history will treat her kindly. Took on the impossible job and despite what anyone said, she managed to get a deal on the table, which was considered the hardest bit of the negotiations. Regardless whether the MPs agreed with it or not, good or bad.
Cameron meanwhile shirked responsibility.
Why do you think there could be amendments or a long extension?
The whole UK parlimentary structure has been shown up to be antiquated, inneffective and in need of reform. On an International stage to boot.That being said, Corbyn looks like exactly the person to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
A lot hinges on the next few weeks.I do strangely think history will treat her kindly. Took on the impossible job and despite what anyone said, she managed to get a deal on the table, which was considered the hardest bit of the negotiations. Regardless whether the MPs agreed with it or not, good or bad.
Cameron meanwhile shirked responsibility.
I am hoping that they do Veto the extension, enough is enough for me.
I do strangely think history will treat her kindly. Took on the impossible job and despite what anyone said, she managed to get a deal on the table, which was considered the hardest bit of the negotiations. Regardless whether the MPs agreed with it or not, good or bad.
Cameron meanwhile shirked responsibility.
Amendments to the motion called next week not the withdrawal agreement. My guess is May will go and a soft brexit compromise will come out of resulting action. The EU want us to go that direction as it only results in changes to the political declaration (i think).
The only options that might pass parliament are second ref and soft brexit right now so it's time they were taken seriously.
Don't forget that she is an MP for a party. She's just the 'fall guy'. Taking the hit for the team. Everyone will blame her and the party goes on.Cheers mate, I am glad we agree.
A Prime Minister should take responsibility for the situations, not pass the buck. If she cannot find a solution, then she should resign, not blame others. She is being paid to do a job, nobody forced her to take this job. If she can't do the job, she should retire.
oh Jeremy
He’s also a member of the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame for his part in Bruce Springsteen’s E Street Band.Who is this plonker?
I do strangely think history will treat her kindly. Took on the impossible job and despite what anyone said, she managed to get a deal on the table, which was considered the hardest bit of the negotiations. Regardless whether the MPs agreed with it or not, good or bad.
Cameron meanwhile shirked responsibility.
You are supposed to share the information.
sorry yeah!
apparently he stormed out of the meeting with May, but trying to find more details
I feel like we're going to accidentally fall off of the cliff with a No Deal at the end of next week.