Raulduke
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2009
- Messages
- 2,572
Blair says everything Corbyn should be saying. Instead Corbyn is at the Kebab Awards
You might be right, I just wonder if a lot of Labour MPs who have spoken about how disastrous no deal would be might be spooked to either voting for her deal or at least abstaining, it's not like Corbyn wants to remain or even have a second referendum so I can't see him actively whipping his MPs against the deal. You are right though that the numbers she needs to win over are massive and the ERG and DUP suddenly see no deal in sight.
This is either going to be really good, really bad or neither.
You’re welcome for that insight.
That leaves No Deal. If we take your confidence motion scenario: by the time a new government is voted in, no deal Brexit will have happened.May's options are pretty limited by my thinking.
I don't think she'd even have the votes for a GE or a referendum. Genuinely think if May tried a GE without any good cause, enough Tory MPs would rebel and wouldn't get the 2/3 majority required. Corbyn can look like the saviour in that scenario as well. Refuse a GE, until Brexit is dealt with and brand May an irresponsible lunatic.
If she tries to go no deal, Corbyn will call a confidence motion and the government will certainly collapse. New "temporary" government will be able to be voted in within 14 days per FTP act, can then deal with Brexit. Just needs a majority of MPs from any party.
The deal can't be voted before September in new parliament session, unless "substantial changes" which May can't get.
Can't be an extension without a referendum or similar as Macron will veto it.
So what does that leave?
This is incredibly disingenuous, and not for the first time in this thread. Both your reasons basically put the blame squarely on the EU for a "good deal" being impossible. A good deal is mostly impossible because of the UK's red lines in the negotiations. That's it. There is no penalty. The UK is not being penalised by the Withdrawal Agreement: it aims to make sure the UK respects the Good Friday Agreement, a binding international treaty.Even if the Labour MPs (in vote leave constituencies ) abstained, its doubtful May would win.
There has been a tremendous hoax perpetrated on the public in the UK, i.e.the belief that we could leave with 'good deal'. It was never going to be possible, a) because of the way A50 is set up; b) because the EU cannot afford to let us walk away without some penalty. Whether its good or bad for us to have a no deal, that is what the vast majority of Leavers voted for, economic consequences didn't come into it, at least for most of them. Hence it was always going to be 'No deal' or 'No Brexit' as in the referendum itself.
Revoke Article 50 has to be the priority now. It can always be triggered again later, there's nothing to stop the Government doing that as far as I know.That leaves No Deal. If we take your confidence motion scenario: by the time a new government is voted in, no deal Brexit will have happened.
Silvio Dante from the Soprano's, who knew he was the man to sort this whole thing out?
If we are not crashing out with no deal and we are not getting an extension then the only option left is to revoke it and then figure out the conditions of if and how it gets invoked again.
This is incredibly disingenuous, and not for the first time in this thread. Both your reasons basically put the blame squarely on the EU for a "good deal" being impossible. A good deal is mostly impossible because of the UK's red lines in the negotiations. That's it. There is no penalty. The UK is not being penalised by the Withdrawal Agreement: it aims to make sure the UK respects the Good Friday Agreement, a binding international treaty.
If it's triggered again in a short time, it's unlikely the EU will negotiate again. Even the current Withdrawal Agreement might be off the table in that case.Revoke Article 50 has to be the priority now. It can always be triggered again later, there's nothing to stop the Government doing that as far as I know.
If we are not crashing out with no deal and we are not getting an extension then the only option left is to revoke it and then figure out the conditions of if and how it gets invoked again.
Revoke Article 50 has to be the priority now. It can always be triggered again later, there's nothing to stop the Government doing that as far as I know.
That is the sensible option, the problem is this government is fecked.
That leaves No Deal. If we take your confidence motion scenario: by the time a new government is voted in, no deal Brexit will have happened.
And you had the best possible deal even within that. Rebate, middle-of-the-road contribution per capita, no Schengen or Euro, more opt-outs than anyone else...When you bash out all the details and negotiate in good faith you realise that a good deal for everyone is what EU Membershio looks like.
Blair says everything Corbyn should be saying. Instead Corbyn is at the Kebab Awards
An extension is only possible if May's deal gets through parliament according to Tusk.
It won't so no extension is possible.
We're screwed.
Yeah , nothing could stop the government from fully transforming the UK into an untrustworthy international partner.Revoke Article 50 has to be the priority now. It can always be triggered again later, there's nothing to stop the Government doing that as far as I know.
This is incredibly disingenuous, and not for the first time in this thread. Both your reasons basically put the blame squarely on the EU for a "good deal" being impossible. A good deal is mostly impossible because of the UK's red lines in the negotiations. That's it. There is no penalty. The UK is not being penalised by the Withdrawal Agreement: it aims to make sure the UK respects the Good Friday Agreement, a binding international treaty.
That's easy, they don't support the deal and blame the ensuing chaos solely on the Torries .Labour now with a big decision to make - support May's deal or we're crashing off the cliff edge next week.
May's options are pretty limited by my thinking.
I don't think she'd even have the votes for a GE or a referendum. Genuinely think if May tried a GE without any good cause, enough Tory MPs would rebel and wouldn't get the 2/3 majority required. Corbyn can look like the saviour in that scenario as well. Refuse a GE, until Brexit is dealt with and brand May an irresponsible lunatic.
If she tries to go no deal, Corbyn will call a confidence motion and the government will certainly collapse. New "temporary" government will be able to be voted in within 14 days per FTP act, can then deal with Brexit. Just needs a majority of MPs from any party.
The deal can't be voted before September in new parliament session, unless "substantial changes" which May can't get.
Can't be an extension without a referendum or similar as Macron will veto it.
So what does that leave?
Yes, the EU would not discuss a trade deal until the UK actually left the EU. A "good deal" is still possible, you just need to leave first. Hence the withdrawal agreement, where the EU accommodated pretty much every British request during the negotiations.No its not, I've put the blame on our own politicians, for pretending to the UK public that it could ask the EU for something it cannot give, even if it wanted to, which I maintain is debateable. There was no possibility, spelled out by the EU, of discussing the Trade element of 'a deal' before the WA was signed and sealed, why, because under A50 we would still be members of the EU. This stance, by the EU, was not negotiable and the phrase "nothing's agreed until every things agreed" appeared for the first time... seems to have disappeared now?
You seem to be reading my text in your own image and likeness, are you a politician by any chance?
I'm guessing the statement will be her spinning her record and also begging people to pressure there MP into supporting her deal.
I think from Tusks statement he expects it to fail and a new direction arranged with haste next week. Although why we're waiting til next week feck knows.
The feck are you talking about?So the EU are saying it HAS to be leave
Crash out with no deal or agree the deal on offer and leave in 50 days. But feck off either way!
Pathetic reaction … the first opportunity the EU have had to play a pro-active part in this and they've shown their hand immediately.
All that crap about "We're stronger together" … "We'll fight to keep you until the end" goes out the fecking window when they get a whiff of the cash available to be divvied up!.
This weekend will be most embarrassing for Macron! While his countrymen are burning down Paris restaurants, chic coffee capsule vendors and fashion houses in their breakdown jackets. Good European people will be peacefully marching in huge numbers in London to show Europe what they are turning their backs on … it will be epic! And if there is even a hint of violence it will be orchestrated by the other side and be mis-reported and blown out of all proportion in the usual rags come Sunday morning.
£900bn in jobs, infrastructure and assets removed from the British finance sector to date … was always going to go this way!
So the EU are saying it HAS to be leave
Crash out with no deal or agree the deal on offer and leave in 50 days. But feck off either way!
Pathetic reaction … the first opportunity the EU have had to play a pro-active part in this and they've shown their hand immediately.
All that crap about "We're stronger together" … "We'll fight to keep you until the end" goes out the fecking window when they get a whiff of the cash available to be divvied up!.
This weekend will be most embarrassing for Macron! While his countrymen are burning down Paris restaurants, chic coffee capsule vendors and fashion houses in their breakdown jackets. Good European people will be peacefully marching in huge numbers in London to show Europe what they are turning their backs on … it will be epic! And if there is even a hint of violence it will be orchestrated by the other side and be mis-reported and blown out of all proportion in the usual rags come Sunday morning.
£900bn in jobs, infrastructure and assets removed from the British finance sector to date … was always going to go this way!
So the EU are saying it HAS to be leave
Crash out with no deal or agree the deal on offer and leave in 50 days. But feck off either way!
Pathetic reaction … the first opportunity the EU have had to play a pro-active part in this and they've shown their hand immediately.
All that crap about "We're stronger together" … "We'll fight to keep you until the end" goes out the fecking window when they get a whiff of the cash available to be divvied up!.
This weekend will be most embarrassing for Macron! While his countrymen are burning down Paris restaurants, chic coffee capsule vendors and fashion houses in their breakdown jackets. Good European people will be peacefully marching in huge numbers in London to show Europe what they are turning their backs on … it will be epic! And if there is even a hint of violence it will be orchestrated by the other side and be mis-reported and blown out of all proportion in the usual rags come Sunday morning.
£900bn in jobs, infrastructure and assets removed from the British finance sector to date … was always going to go this way!