That doesn't seem very... democratic? A minister should have an own opinion and vote at all time. Weird, never heard about this before.
Seems all very serious (sackings and what not) for something some people keep saying is legally meaningless.
Almost certain if she is forced to pursue and extension I thinkSo May might bring back her deal for another vote. What a joke
...you serious? This is politics 101 - they follow the party line.
Government policy is considered collective cabinet responcibilityThat doesn't seem very... democratic? A minister should have an own opinion and vote at all time. Weird, never heard about this before.
We're only in this mess because of party politics, ironically.Our government consists of 6-7 parties, so this is much more unlikely. And this should go far beyond party politics.
We know that the leave vote was overwhelmingly carried by the older generations. I am not too worried about riots etc. I would rather a few people get offended and feel betrayed, than the entire country gets fecked.
Putting it another way - surely following through with Brexit despite all of the warning signs, sets a very dangerous precedent that we [the country] arent interested in experts, and that public opinion must always be right.
There is a popular (and largely inaccurate) phrase that "the customer is always right". If you offered a referendum on drastically cutting taxes, people would vote for it. If you offered a referendum on massively increasing spending on the NHS, people would vote for it. Unfortunately neither of these scenarios might turn out to actually be feasible or realistic. Just because someone wants something, doesn't always mean they need to get it. This is a basic lesson taught to children.
A slightly more cynical and controversial note is on the very nature of capitalist democracy at the moment. We have seen in the USA and in the UK that the truth doesn't really seem to matter any more - what matters is marketing, appealing to the lowest common denominator and rallying people to your banner at any cost. These behaviors have now utterly eclipsed any notion of "doing the right thing" or "the greater good" when it comes to winning votes, sadly.
There is an ideological question here of what the purpose of our MPs (and other countries equivalents) actually is. Is it to implement the "will of the people" at all costs, or is it to do what they believe is best for the people they represent? Ideally the two should of course be aligned, but when they aren't - what do you do then? This is frankly a bigger question even than Brexit. It is a question of ideology and of the very nature of our democracy.
Taking back control, they said
Already happened.Narrow margin of victory for a non-legally binding vote....sounds familiar. Funny to watch the likes of JRM poo-poo it now.
Only because an amendment she tried to bury.This is astonishing stuff if you're interested in the workings of Parliament. A Government whipping against its own motion?
This is astonishing stuff if you're interested in the workings of Parliament. A Government whipping against its own motion?
Our government consists of 6-7 parties, so this is much more unlikely. And this should go far beyond party politics.
The whips have a massive influence. They always have.Is there any effective difference between a whipped vote and a free vote? Tory MP's seem to be voting whichever way they like anyway...
At some point it's better to stop pretending?
Shocking, Corbyn must go.This is astonishing stuff if you're interested in the workings of Parliament. A Government whipping against its own motion?
What you on about?
Close, but no cigar.Shocking, Corbyn must go.
Am I doing it right?
Thank god we'll soon have 100% of our power in the hands of this shower. That'll really sort out the country.