and ministers may resign?
If they wanted to vote against the whip, they'd have to resign.
and ministers may resign?
No it was just an amendment to the motion put by the PM. It will be voted on again after the Malthouse amendment is voted down. The thing is that today's votes are only motions so are not legally binding.
So the DUP will vote against taking No-Deal off the table, but they don’t want no deal, they think the UK should threaten the EU with No-Deal. Class
and ministers may resign?
Why the no-deal amendment does not definitely rule out no deal
It is important to stress, of course, that the Spelman amendment passed a few minutes ago does not definitely rule out a no-deal Brexit. There are two reasons for that. First, it is not a binding amendment. It is not legislation, and it is not a motion that gives a formal instruction to the government (like the “humble address” motions). The government could choose to accept it, and treat it as binding, but it has not said yet that it will. And even if it did ... Second, it is not within the government’s power to rule out no deal (in the terms of the motion) because it does not call for article 50 to be revoked (which would probably require separate legislation anyway). Caroline Spelman and Jack Dromey, who tabled it, intended it to signal that ministers should extend article 50 in the event of no deal being agreed. But, as Theresa May says repeatedly, that only postpones the problem.
Yes, but not legally binding, interesting to see the response to this
Government were originally going to have a free vote for the main "take no deal from table" motion, meaning ministers could choose how to vote, but now that it's been amended, the government are going to make their MPs vote against it, meaning ministers cannot vote for it without resigning.Can anybody translate that into simple language for someone not familiar with nuances of the UK gov. system? What does it all mean?
You are not wrong.Am I wrong, or isn't this just votes on amendments?
Majority of 4 on Spelman/Dromey will translate to a higher majority on the actual motion.
The intention of the Government was to have a free vote on their motion tonight. That means their MPs can vote any way they see fit. Now that an amendment to that motion has been narrowly passed to say no-deal should be ruled out under any circumstances and must never happen, the Government doesn't want its own motion to pass, because they don't want that amendment.Can anybody translate that into simple language for someone not familiar with nuances of the UK gov. system? What does it all mean?
Rees Mogg dealing out the 'this isn't binding, it's not law' line.
Bit like the referendum dickhead.
Can anybody translate that into simple language for someone not familiar with nuances of the UK gov. system? What does it all mean?
He is correct. The current law is that the UK will leave the EU on 29/3 whether or not their is a deal and as we all know the deal has been rejected.
He is correct. The current law is that the UK will leave the EU on 29/3 whether or not their is a deal and as we all know the deal has been rejected.
I know and understand the hypocrisy of the whole thing.So was the referendum...
They offered a free vote... But have now decided to instruct people to vote against... If you hold a government post and vote against the instruction (the whip) you are by convention supposed to resign (or again in theory be sacked)Can anybody translate that into simple language for someone not familiar with nuances of the UK gov. system? What does it all mean?
They offered a free vote... But have now decided to instruct people to vote against... If you hold a government post and vote against the instruction (the whip) you are by convention supposed to resign (or again in theory be sacked)
...you serious? This is politics 101 - they follow the party line.That doesn't seem very... democratic? A minister should have an own opinion and vote at all time. Weird, never heard about this before.
his most iconic moment in all this was voting against his amendment to the withdrawal bill, he's a textbook cowardGrieve said he'd resign the whip if the Tories began to back no deal. And if they three-line whip against this vote... they're backing no deal.
The gov said earlier if it passed they'd pass the neccesary legislation to change the date.