Why isn't Intelligence informing the government? They must know.
Brexited | the worst threads live the longest
- Thread starter Silva
- Start date
If parliament vote against a no deal then it surely has to be revocation I’d imagine.
A horrible cnut.
Agreed.
Good grief, if true, it should be put as his tagline. Then people won't waste time replying.You once claimed that it shouldn’t be possible for countries to be in debt because they can just print more money Are you sure you should be casting judgement on the pros and cons of money systems
Could be a number of reasons. Perhaps telling the truth, and prosecuting all those involved, would be viewed as destroying public faith in our politics?
We would probably need parliament to vote in favour of rescinding art 50. Given that the Government is incompetent and MPs cant agree on what type of cereal they want for breakfast, we could be in trouble.
The issue is that they need to vote for revocation, they are good at voting against things but there is nobody to vote for something.
Simply put, they have nothing to lose in granting an extension. On the other hand there is albeit a slim possibility of a election or new referendum, which may turn in their favour. So why not? No real reason will be expected. I don't see any trouble in getting this extended.
No way A50 is revoked , it will be a field day in the press with the pitchforks out for those who voted. "Enemies of the people " , etc.
He did. For the life of me I can’t remember what thread it was, but the post was iconic. He also talked about legally hiring assassins to kill people, among other things. It’s probably my favourite post ever since I’ve been on the caf.
Guy said that he wants to know what the government is doing with the money to put the country in debt, because a country can’t be in debt if they can print more money, which means that something suspicious is going on
This is good information. Putting him on ignore. I would encourage everyone to do the same
He did. For the life of me I can’t remember what thread it was, but the post was iconic. He also talked about legally hiring assassins to kill people, among other things. It’s probably my favourite post ever since I’ve been on the caf.
Guy said that he wants to know what the government is doing with the money to put the country in debt, because a country can’t be in debt if they can print more money, which means that something suspicious is going on
It was the Alex Jones thread if I remember
If A50 is going to be revoked, which is unlikely anyway, I could only see it happening if it came from within. If the reason to do it was the people vote for it, or MPs decide to do it on the basis that voters were sold a lie in the referendum and they convinced themselves this invalidated the referendum result, or something along those lines. It couldnt happen as a result of the EU holding a gun to our heads, which is what a refusal to extend the negotiation period would be interpreted as in the British media.
If you give Britain two choices 1) gouge your own eye out with a fork, or 2) appear subservient to Europe, its going to be option 1 every single time.
If you give Britain two choices 1) gouge your own eye out with a fork, or 2) appear subservient to Europe, its going to be option 1 every single time.
I guess we're both reading that article a little differently then.
No matter. As for the key point you mention, I've been saying that all along, No point extending just to rinse and repeat. It has to be for something different. That is why I can't understand the MPs being whipped at the moment for "malthouse" – the EU have already rejected that have they not?
They’ll do nothing. Just a bunch of loud obnoxious cnuts (both right wing press and right wingers themselves). From day one to now.
That it was mate. I think the post needs to be resurrected so that people can see who they’re arguing with and not waste their energy.
No. Here's the thing. People can say he's a nut and deserves to be censored but prove to anyone he's not playing a role for the sole purpose of introducing censorship and you can't and therefore it's a dangerous route to go down JUST because you believe he's this or that (it means you take things at face value). Because then you are being herded like sheep down a certain interlectual path that don't HAVE to be true.... If you follow politics or know much the CIA coined the term conspiracy theorist. By definition in 2018, if you ask a question that is not supported by the mainstream, that is what you are. It's dangerous to be put under an umbrella because it allows for generalization. YouTube and the like talk about 'hate speech', but this is all politically motivated. People don't get that when you have big corporations financing people trying to get into government, then THAT by it's nature IS a conspiracy. And likewise if a government was in control how can it ever be in debt and what is the purpose of any government to be in debt? It can only ever be to influence policy. Especially when you had a time whereby governments could create money interest free. It seems almost stupid to put debt on yourself unless there is a reason people are not told. But Corporations don't pay big money, for zero influence. It's bad business. So I think you can look at this from multiple perspectives rather then one. The foundation for me is the credibility of the man. Is he legitimate OR was his purpose to be seen as crazy as to create this snowball effect? When you legitimize something then you accept the notion of censorship PERIOD but isn't it funny? You have the dark web...where people can hire someone to commit murder say...or to buy drugs and that's not censored and that don't cause outrage...and yet you get the media thinking Alex Jones is the biggest threat?( I wonder if it's to influence people who are not clued in or tech savvy and perhaps who are much more likely to vote) This is all politics and from my POV, he must return to youtube and if you don't want to watch him? Don't. But some people choose to be offended for a whole host of reasons. Oh and check out the alex jones indie song which is really good
This is who has been causing chaos for the past couple pages
In fairness he mentioned the nwo in his second post or so. Shouldn't have needed 2 pages to cop that replying to him wasn't going to be especially productive.
At least my conspiracy theories involve those fascinating Kardashians...
My god that is hard to read.
Tbf talking to him might be entertaining (looks unlikely). Just not productive
Ah damn i missed another representative of the common man coming in telling us how it is.
We had endless debates which had significant viewing figures, there was never ever a push towards no deal even from the hardest brexiteers. I know it's been two years but people can't be that forgetful
We had endless debates which had significant viewing figures, there was never ever a push towards no deal even from the hardest brexiteers. I know it's been two years but people can't be that forgetful
To be fair, the minute people voted the Leave campaign switched its goal to a no deal while accusing the EU of not being nice enough to give a good deal to the UK. So people probably have forgotten what was said before the vote.
Can I just get this quite clear, if Article 50 is revoked, can we carry on as before and forget this whole horrid Brexit nonsense?
In theory yes, but nothing will ever erase the experience of the last couple of years in practice, not for us or for the EU.
I think that he believes that he is a hero for getting the vote to leave the EU.
If only he knew what people really think of the stupid dick.
Oh my god the lack of paragraphs. My eyes, ze goggles do nothing!
Yes but we need a majority of MPs to vote for it first!
I get where you are coming from. I put an emphasis on the multiple "ifs" while you focus on one particular scenario where a 21 months extension would make sense. I can't say that you are wrong because that wouldn't be consistent with my point about the fact that we can't tell until member states have more information about the purpose of the extension but I don't think that it's fair to say that the EU is more favorable to a lengthy extension because the quotes do not exclude the fact that EU leaders could be against an extension or that a three month technical extension could "cut it".
The thing that we know is that today without a clear decision made by the UK, no extension is the default position. I hope that you see my point.
You give too much credit to the majority of “average” voters.
But thats exactly what the leave campaign did. Your posts are full of so many contradictions
Brexiteers getting desperate....
Yes, there would be no divorce, we will both be unhappy but we will stay together... for the sake of the kids!
I'm not old enough nor clued in enough to comment on the accuracy of this, but I thought it was quite funny.
Why is he relevant in 2019 his party disappeared over the last 2 elections.
May continues with her plan to run right down to the deadline, then hold another vote on her Withdrawal Agreement, this time either to accept it, or vote against again and leave with no deal by default.
We've not seen the last vote on the Withdrawal Agreement yet, in my opinion.
This is highly possible, and at the end of the day, she'll say to Corbyn , is Labour going to back the deal or not, if not..
Looks like that chap is a tinfoil hat wearerThat it was mate. I think the post needs to be resurrected so that people can see who they’re arguing with and not waste their energy.
This is who has been causing chaos for the past couple pages