Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
Does the spirit of the blitz even exist in modern Britain? Britain now has people who call 999 when the local KFC shuts down. Seems fanatstical; more likely is a humongous national meltdown.
 
Does the spirit of the blitz even exist in modern Britain? Britain now has people who call 999 when the local KFC shuts down. Seems fanatstical; more likely is a humongous national meltdown.
The Blitz spirit was so focused. There was a clear enemy and you needed to withstand for your children and your children's children. I think everyone was on the same wavelength at that time.

Brexit is far more complex IMHO. Nobody really knows what to focus on and how to drum up blanket national support for this. The population is pretty much 50/50 as are the UK member states with Wales and England wanting to leave but Scotland and NI wanting to remain. I would always say that spirit exists but you need the right circumstances and leaders to channel this spirit. I think the right circumstances are coming in the form of an Economic downturn and further austerity so all you need is the enigmatic leader to emerge to bring you out of the doldrums..............enter Jeremey stage left................;)
 
Which anyone with a brain already knew to be the case.

We'll have a wall of our own in this country soon and it'll be around London.

:lol: in the comments section Corbyn is referred to as 'The High Sparrow'. Great nickname. I guess that makes May Cersei Lannister?


When does she make her walk of Shame?

Well that livened up my lunchtime.
 
It's daft that you even have the audacity to write that. If she thought that May's decisions were detrimental to the country then she should have voted against her and it's even worse when she thinks that May has a major character flaw, that's the entire point of a motion of no confidence, by voting the opposite of what she actually thought she demonstrated that she is morally bankrupt and the fact that it's usual in politics isn't an excuse.

Do you know what.
I really don't care what you think.

I don’t doubt that you may be a reasonably intelligent individual. But you are most certainly not the only person on this forum who is so and your views are just that; your views.

And by the way I find your posts extremely condescending. You have a bad habit of continually belittling other people's views and if you wish to be taken seriously, you should correct that.
 
Do you know what.
I really don't care what you think.

I don’t doubt that you may be a reasonably intelligent individual. But you are most certainly not the only person on this forum who is so and your views are just that; your views.

And by the way I find your posts extremely condescending. You have a bad habit of continually belittling other people's views and if you wish to be taken seriously, you should correct that.

I offer you my apologies for that.
 
Brexit: Amber Rudd, David Gauke and Greg Clarke issue delay warning

Brexit should be delayed if Parliament does not approve a deal in the coming days, three cabinet ministers have warned publicly for the first time.

Ahead of crucial votes in the Commons next week, Amber Rudd, David Gauke and Greg Clark say time is running out and that the country faces a choice.

Writing in the Daily Mail, they say they hope there will be a breakthrough in negotiations in the next few days.

This would allow a new deal to be presented to Parliament.

But they argue if a deal is not endorsed by MPs imminently “it would be better to seek to extend Article 50 and delay our date of departure rather than crash out of the European Union on March 29.”

They add: “After months of uncertainty, it is time that MPs recognised the need to get a deal, accepted that this is the only deal on offer, and supported it.”

But they also warn Brexiteers in the European Research Group that Parliament will block the UK leaving without a deal, stating that if there is a delay “they will have no-one to blame but themselves”.

It comes after the BBC was told dozens of normally loyal Tories could back plans to stop the UK leaving the EU without a deal if a reworked version of the PM’s plan does not pass.




 
Rumours are she has her eyes on an EU leaders meeting around 22 march... She could try to wait till then for a late concession then try to get her deal approved the following week.
In reality though it seems likley parliament will seek to act before then to prevent such last minute brinkmanship... I guess we will see what she brings back to the house next week and then what people try to tag onto that (and if it has any legal force)
I suspect that at 1 month to go it will probably be now or never for those looking to take control of the process (leave and remain)

Gut feel we see something like the Cox codicil... Basically a text tagged onto the legal agreement that allows Cox to change his legal advice

Personally I don't think that will keep the erg happy

I don't see how any MP could support the current "deal" without changes to the text of the agreement to remove the backstop. That won't happen.

The 3 options are still the same.

Cabinet ministers peeling off already saying they want an extension and won't allow no deal, the same goes for 500+ MPs and always has done. EU fully aware of this I think and just waiting. No need to offer anything.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...rs-signal-theyre-ready-help-delay-Brexit.html

Nothing changed since December. Just May's desperation. If she did ask for an extension to A50 EU could say no or put conditions. Could she even resign, finally?
 
Which anyone with a brain already knew to be the case.

We'll have a wall of our own in this country soon and it'll be around London.

:lol: in the comments section Corbyn is referred to as 'The High Sparrow'. Great nickname. I guess that makes May Cersei Lannister?

She is more of a selyse Baratheon ie she feels entitled for the crown despite having the means to actually claim it. Rees mogg would be the perfect Stannis.
 
][/QUOTE]
I don't see how any MP could support the current "deal" without changes to the text of the agreement to remove the backstop. That won't happen.

There is a phrase I've heard on a few episodes of brexitcast which is giving some of the erg a ladder high enough to climb off their horse

Apparently a few of them far more concerned about winning the war (future deal being more WTO / Canada and getting a brexiteer to take over from may) than this particular battle... And if there was a codicil tagged on to the end that allowed Cox to change his legal advice that might be a big enough ladder to get some of them off their high horses.

It wouldn't involve changing the deal... Rather some fluff attached saying it won't be a permanent solution...
 


Sometimes I think the EU will be better off when it doesn’t have to deal with twats like this any more.

Our foreign secretary right there. We are an embarrassment.
In fact, how can you be that bad? I was in year fecking 9 when I learnt about General Tito.
 
Last edited:


Sometimes I think the EU will be better off when it doesn’t have to deal with twats like this any more.


What do you think the other times :D?

At this point it's become perfectly clear that a lot of tories don't give a flying feck about the EU, which is why they never care to actually read about anything (granted we all have idiots like that in every country, but usually they aren't ministers, usually). Whether it's the rules of the community or the history of it's member states, they just don't care. We'll miss the Brits as a society, but I don't think anyone will miss these tories politicians.

Their incompetence has been in Europe's spotlight these past few years. To think these people thought themselves capable of predicting the future of the EURO :lol:
 


Sometimes I think the EU will be better off when it doesn’t have to deal with twats like this any more.


Its utterly pathetic that someone that ignorant is the foreign secretary but surely theres someone working for him who can stop him making a total cnut of himself.
 
Its utterly pathetic that someone that ignorant is the foreign secretary but surely theres someone working for him who can stop him making a total cnut of himself.
Yeah I don't get it either. Clearly he's incredibly dim, but surely he has a support team that prep him for these occasions?
 
Yeah I don't get it either. Clearly he's incredibly dim, but surely he has a support team that prep him for these occasions?

No, not at the moment, all his Foreign Office minions have been seconded to working on a 'managed' No Deal...no need to worry then!
 
The same PM has appointed Hunt, Grayling, McVey and Johnson among others.
 
The same PM has appointed Hunt, Grayling, McVey and Johnson among others.
In her defence it's a pretty shallow pool of talent she has at her disposal and quite a few of the semi competent lot probably wouldn't take a job off her anyway as they couldn't sign up to the collective cabinet resoncibility

You left out Davies though... The man who negotiated the backstop and was then shocked at what was in it
 
In her defence it's a pretty shallow pool of talent she has at her disposal and quite a few of the semi competent lot probably wouldn't take a job off her anyway as they couldn't sign up to the collective cabinet resoncibility

You left out Davies though... The man who negotiated the backstop and was then shocked at what was in it
I intentionally left our the brexit secretaries. Those are a special breed.
 
No, not at the moment, all his Foreign Office minions have been seconded to working on a 'managed' No Deal...no need to worry then!
Someone needs to teach him about the wonder of google then.

Definitely a future Tory party leader.
Worrying thing is that there are actually so many worse candidates still, eg Johnson, Raab etc...
 
Michael Gove: “As I speak, there is no absolute guarantee that we would be able to continue to export food to the EU.”

“A huge proportion of our food exports to the EU go through Calais. As I speak, there are no border inspection posts at Calais. None.”
<- this was a quote that should also include that the EU has demanded 100% inspections on products

https://twitter.com/PropertySpot/status/1097852933608259584

Only when the deer are in the headlights does reality start to set in. As many here would be about to guess, i think they should revoke Art. 50 and stay in the EU. The simple reality is, if you are going to leave, you need to put in about 10 years of work BEFORE triggering the article.

This display of arrogance and stupidity is now aiming to burn the country down to "trigger remainers" online. It's a farce.