Ubik
Nothing happens until something moves!
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2010
- Messages
- 19,408
Who gives a shit about the country anyway? A party needs to be kept together.
Lost generation, here we come.
Who gives a shit about the country anyway? A party needs to be kept together.
Who gives a shit about the country anyway? A party needs to be kept together.
That thread is pretty grimIf anyone needs an insight into the majority of people that voted Brexit, check out the responses to this status
Han Brown is a wind up account that started by taking the piss out of the Manchester music scene. Just been reopened and has reeled in a tonne of leavers. Whoever runs it sponsored the post to get more people to see it, and one idiot thinks that means someone has sponsored it like you would sponsor someone to swim a mile or something, and has threatened to report it if it's publicly funded.
Almost all of them can't even work out that Han is a girl's name.
https://www.facebook.com/194741718000203/posts/398549810952725/
That thread is pretty grim
Did they give you a clue as to what they thought the long term gain would be?
Who gives a shit about the country anyway? A party needs to be kept together.
They delusional
Immigration had been proven to be positive for every economy. They use more services but they generate way more taxes to compensate as they are sane and in a good age to not get sick, also they came here to make money, not to be on welfare (there is that odd exception like in anything else, like locals too)
And they will never have a better deal with 27 of their neighbours (the most important economies because of their proximity) like the one they have now.
That are FACTS
The only thing will be to strike new trade deals with other economies. That no-one can know, depends on if in UK you have mastermind trade dealers, and seeing their proficiency on brexit I doubt it. Also is less probable to have worse deals being a tiny economy of 60 millions than inside the EU. But as I said, no one knows.
But the first 2 facts? are indisputable
Guess not then...feck sake now she wants more time again. No organisation would allow this level of incompetence.
Have we gotten any closer to a resolution peeps?
The naked pro-Europe campaigner Victoria Bateman has repeated her challenge to a debate with the arch-Brexiter Jacob Rees-Mogg on live TV but has dropped her demand that the Tory MP should also take off his clothes for the event
With his rep for having kids she's likely to fall pregnant if he breathes on her in that state.
Must all be sorted then.
What's the point of her being naked?Naked anti-Brexit campaigner challenges Rees-Mogg on live TV
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...it-campaigner-challenges-rees-mogg-on-live-tv
Yes, it's come to this.
She's an economics fellow at Cambridge University.
Rees-Mogg has yet to reply - that's hardly in keeping with the Blitz spirit of Brexit.
What's the point of her being naked?
Are there any good public Brexit parties planned for March 29th?
Is it going to be designated as a National Holiday (Independence Day), like the 4th of July in the US?
There is a 30 minute video on Vimeo of her whole (naked) speech in Cambridge - for those who may be interested..What's the point of her being naked?
EDIT: I guess it kinda explains it although it mainly seems to be for publicity.
Is she fit?There is a 30 minute video on Vimeo of her whole (naked) speech in Cambridge - for those who may be interested..
She maybe fits into the category of the subject of the thread in the General about women you find attractive although not classically pretty..Is she fit?
Plus, given her job, she's probably not short on cash and can presumably give decent financial advice.She maybe fits into the category of the subject of the thread in the General about women you find attractive although not classically pretty..
I wonder if she does any talks on the Bush presidency?Plus, given her job, she's probably not short on cash and can presumably give decent financial advice.
Naked anti-Brexit campaigner challenges Rees-Mogg on live TV
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...it-campaigner-challenges-rees-mogg-on-live-tv
Yes, it's come to this.
She's an economics fellow at Cambridge University.
Rees-Mogg has yet to reply - that's hardly in keeping with the Blitz spirit of Brexit.
OK. So a CU or FTA with the EU would not overcome the Irish border issue?
You can see why people get confused because I have taken the time to check these things out and:
Corbyn is talking about A Permanent CU with the EU.
From what I have read, that would overcome the Irish border issue.
Stockpiling body bags. That's where it's got to.
Stockpiling body bags. That's where it's got to.
At least a zombie apocalypse would be entertaining.It's Brexit not zombie apocalypse. Feck sakes...
I have just listened to the HoC update on the radio.
In response to TM, JC stated that the reason why he wants a 'Legally Binding Customs Union with the EU' is to ensure that there can be a frictionless trade and no hard border border in Ireland and so overcome the the need for the backstop.
These are not his precise words but essentially that is what he said. He most certainly said the words Legally binding customs union with the EU and did not say Free Trade Agreement and he did not say remain in the EUCU.
Now. I mentioned this yesterday and was told that I was wrong and that I didn't understand which I accepted.
If Jeremy Corbyn is wrong then I would suggest that someone needs to tell the leader of the opposition that he doesn't understand and that he is wrong.
That's what we've been saying since he released his cunning plan.
Being in 'A' not 'THE'.
You can't have a custom's union where you can have unilateral deals and have open borders. Page 1025 covers most of it.
May's told him he's wrong.
He is wrong, it's the vague wording that's confusing people.
That's what we've been saying since he released his cunning plan.
Being in 'A' not 'THE'.
You can't have a custom's union where you can have unilateral deals and have open borders. Page 1025 covers most of it.
May's told him he's wrong.
He is wrong, it's the vague wording that's confusing people.