it's just a burn pogue not everything has to follow some ancient rules of debateTextbook whataboutism.
Not unlike Piers Morgan.
Is he clever - hell no.
All he does is to say the first stupid thing that comes into his oversized head and then keeps repeating it over and over and over again.
Hold on, remind me again what the benefits of Brexit were?
Hold on, remind me again what the benefits of Brexit were?
Aside from that border that virtually anyone can cross.We get our country back!!!!!!!!!!
Beggars belief, it really does.
Its funny. We are an absolute laughing stock because of our stupid decisions. Yet when we are called out about our stupidity we have the same people crying about how someone called us stupid. How about the accept the reality of our mistakes?
Yes but initially the likes of Farage, Paterson and Johnson et al were all talking about a Norway and Switzerland type relationship. They didn't think through the meaning of being of the CU/SM. They didn't consider NI either. They had never thought it through because they didn't really believe the UK would do the deed.
You can't make this up."It's clear the charges are nothing to do with Brexit"
Stupid fecking lying cow.
Cause and effect. For those like me with an interest in science, it is important to consider cause and effect.
We all know the effect; the UK voted
There is a good saying:
Piss poor planning leads to piss poor product.
How true that is and there is another good saying:
Cause and effect.
The effect is evident - a shambles.
The cause - piss poor planning.
If we learn just one thing from our abysmal brexit process, it must be not to jump into anything without proper planning.
it's just a burn pogue not everything has to follow some ancient rules of debate
and brexiteers have a plan, loot the country, but no one gives a shit because they know what tusk intended and didn't completely miss the pointIt’s not even a very good burn, seeing as Tusk was still Prime Minister of Poland when the EU were dealing with the banking crisis, never mind having anything to do with “designing the monetary union”.
It's not even funny... as she would know this. Can't stand these snakes.
By then you will be french and will call them "them".
Well that too, I was actually referring to this though:
And that's just on the last 5 pages.
@Bola don't even bother answering. Your posts are a waste of time.
Just sayin' it like it is.
Yes but initially the likes of Farage, Paterson and Johnson et al were all talking about a Norway and Switzerland type relationship. They didn't think through the meaning of being of the CU/SM. They didn't consider NI either. They had never thought it through because they didn't really believe the UK would do the deed.
The way I see it, the issue would be with so called ‘mixed’ trade deals, which require ratification by individual EU member states. In simple terms, these are trade deals that include services, intellectual property rights and other things not deemed an exclusive competence of the EU.But that sentence doesn't mean much, it could be 1 of 28 says which is perfectly fine. For me what makes it ridiculous is that he is more or less offering full EU membership.
The way I see it, the issue would be with so called ‘mixed’ trade deals, which require ratification by individual EU member states. In simple terms, these are trade deals that include services, intellectual property rights and other things not deemed an exclusive competence of the EU.
If the UK has an effective veto over these types of trade deals, that would be a big thing for the EU to concede. And if the UK doesn’t have a veto (like the other states), then we all know it doesn’t mean anything.
Personally think May will bow down to Corbyn's invitation, slightly altered form of the proposal he put forward is going to get accepted by the EU and will pass through UK parliament I believe. UK will have to stay within the EU Custom Union rather than Turkey's variant though as otherwise it doesn't solve Irish border issue. No-deal isn't going to happen, UK done zero preparations and they know it. The hit would be enormous at all levels no PM is going to take that kind of responsibility on their shoulders.
Why do you think EU wouldn't accept it with few modifications? I'm pretty confident it would pass through Parliament given the binary choice between a no deal and this hypothetical agreement with no time for maneuvering.The EU will never accept Corbyn's proposal nor will parliament approve it.
Why do you think EU wouldn't accept it with few modifications? I'm pretty confident it would pass through Parliament given the binary choice between a no deal and this hypothetical agreement with no time for maneuvering.
"The RoI left our union in 1922 after 121 years of being part of the family."
And what a family it was.
Is it possible to have a/the CU without being part of the single market and therefore FoM?Yes the stance would change if she changes the red lines, but the EU mean that if the UK stays in the CU/SM but we knew this two years ago . I keep hearing that FoM was the main reason the UK left and the second reason was sovereignty which they haven't lost.
Tusk is right, the UK has no idea what it wants other than fantasies.
Don't see what the EU could concede.
Is it possible to have a/the CU without being part of the single market and therefore FoM?
What is the downside to CU, independent trade policy?
Turkey is in the cu but not the single marketIs it possible to have a/the CU without being part of the single market and therefore FoM?
What is the downside to CU, independent trade policy?
Is it possible to have a/the CU without being part of the single market and therefore FoM?
What is the downside to CU, independent trade policy?