But you know what happens if he doesnt score! dropped points!
going round the houses here, as a team we have a better chance of success if our striker is not missing easy chances. You do not get many in a game so you have to take the ones you get otherwise bye bye top 4 we cant rely on mata or pogba to score wordlies we need our number 9 to do his job and score the easy chances.
I haven't seen the ferynord game but I hear he was good
Going round the houses is indeed correct because you just circled back to your first argument which completely ignores every single point I've made so far.
I don't know that we drop points if he doesn't score unless we put him out on the pitch by himself, and AFAIK we have yet to do that.
He didn't score against Feyenoord yet we won 4-0. (he was quite poor that game btw, despite being involved in 3 of the goals)
We had 3 points in the bag against Stoke without him scoring but DDG fumbled and they could equalize. Lingard, Pogba etc missed extremely good chances to score (some of which Zlatan set up), but somehow it's only because of Zlatan's misses that we didn't win? We create one chance against Liverpool all game and because he misses that he's the reason we "dropped" 2 points? How exactly does that logic work?
Just because he's the striker doesn't mean his mistakes costs us more points than any other players mistakes that leads to goals conceded or missed chances.
I have no problem with people saying he's been poor, because overall he can do a lot better. But blaming one player for our position in the table is absurd, and I would say that even if Smalling was the one being blamed..