acnumber9
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2006
- Messages
- 22,564
What counts as deliberate will come down to interpretation. Like most rules or laws.Fairly sure that is the rule.
What counts as deliberate will come down to interpretation. Like most rules or laws.Fairly sure that is the rule.
or what team you are of course.What counts as deliberate will come down to interpretation. Like most rules or laws.
Which rule are you referring to?
Not even a replay of the Carroll tackle on eriksen. Looked a red to me in real time
The TV camera was from the other angle, didn’t realize how bad a tackle it actually was.It really should have been red. The ref is standing next to the situation and should be able to see it. (And what is even more crazy is that Andy Carroll learned nothing from getting away with it.)
It really should have been red. The ref is standing next to the situation and should be able to see it. (And what is even more crazy is that Andy Carroll learned nothing from getting away with it.)
I thought it was stonewall, but if I were to rationalize a non-decision, the defender also got a touch on the ball (after going through Case). Who knows, reffing in this game was terrible.Someone please explain how it wasn't a penalty for the challenge on casemiro
I thought it was stonewall, but if I were to rationalize a non-decision, the defender also got a touch on the ball (after going through Case). Who knows, reffing in this game was terrible.
In another episode it was Carroll (I think) who went through Malacia lowering his shoulder to catch the defender full in the middle of his chest and hurling him into touch. A nasty piece of work!They should really use video footage to help referees punish decisions like that.
It really should have been red. The ref is standing next to the situation and should be able to see it. (And what is even more crazy is that Andy Carroll learned nothing from getting away with it.)
Said this just before the match thread crashed. He didn't make a meal of it compared to the Chelsea player who got a pen from mct that game. If he falls and rolls about var probably looks and over turns it.In a weird way the Maguire one is more infuriating. He is literally held back from getting to their goalscorer. He may not have made it but an opponent's fouls stopped him doing that. They are the decisions I fecking hate. It's a 'clear and obvious' foul but for some reason its just ignored. Like how incompetent to you have to be to not see someone being clearly fouled and still not make the call. Didn't matter tonight but eventually will.
And the subjective decision on the pitch was that it wasn’t offside, because the linesman didn’t give it on the pitch, so therefore they have deemed this a clear and obvious error then in order for them to overturn it based on the subjective interpretation. So why would they do that? They’ve literally just raised the bar for VAR interventions to deny us penalties over the past few games, and now they’re lowering it again.That's the subjective part I guess.
It's all down to the furore from the Bruno goal against Stockport. Refs can see if they don't give us a decision they are not going to be criticised but when they do all hell breaks loose.Two clear pens not given recently. This one and the mctom one against palace. At least this one didn't cost us. Refs need to be available for post match questions.
Refs can see if they don't give us a decision they are not going to be criticised but when they do all hell breaks loose.
How are they going to get around this one?
What’s the point in having it if even when it’s used they don’t make the correct call. It’s an absolute farcethese terrible rules about when VAR can and can't be used are ridiculous. what's the point in having it if it can't be used in most circumstances?