vodrake
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2012
- Messages
- 3,509
VAR should be used for correcting refereeing mistakes, but instead its just being used to close circles around them even further and make them even more unaccountable for their decisions
What is he on about? Put his body in the way? He shoved him in the back.
He did say the Fabinho one should be red I think?
True. Good point. Which reminds me. Video refereeing has always been a load of bollox.
Firstly, it’s important to state that the principal objective behind retrospective action is to punish players who have clearly committed a red card offence ‘off the ball’.
It is not designed to ‘re-referee’ tackles but can be applied if an act of violent conduct or serious foul play occurred secondary to the challenge or if the match officials’ view of the specific misconduct was unclear.
In order for The FA to take retrospective action it must first establish from the match officials whether the incident was ‘not seen’. If they confirm they did see it then in almost all cases no further action is taken.
The thing that got me was that the commentator said that it couldn't be reviewed because it was outside the box but he was last man so surely they could review for a red card?
The thing that got me was that the commentator said that it couldn't be reviewed because it was outside the box but he was last man so surely they could review for a red card?
or what team you are of course.
This is why the rules need changing. Interpretation should not be allowed.
Offside has become far too confusing. If you're standing offside in any situation you should be offside. Just clear it up and make it simple for everybody.
That angle is horrendous
And apparently it was the Premier League's head of VAR looking at the challenges so what can we really expect from the others if the boss is absolutely clueless and borderline corrupt? The state of the VAR in England is a mystery.Even Dale Johnson isn't defending the decisions. Absolutely ludicrous bias towards Liverpool in the Wolves game and today.
https://www.espn.com/soccer/english...a-konate-somehow-escape-red-cards-at-brighton
Football is such a joke these days...
Even Dale Johnson isn't defending the decisions. Absolutely ludicrous bias towards Liverpool in the Wolves game and today.
https://www.espn.com/soccer/english...a-konate-somehow-escape-red-cards-at-brighton
Football is such a joke these days...
Crucially, the ball comes off Keita's leg before probably touching his arm. The deflection off the body is also a qualifying exemption against a handball offence -- but a deliberate act would still supersede this.
It’s not even funny anymore. It’s not with VAR itself, something has happened with the referees and it needs explained. United, as an example, rarely get 50/50s these days but Liverpool constantly gets the 80/20 against in their favour. As a United fan I’m sick of reading why posters can see why it’s close call went against us, it always seems to be against us!Even Dale Johnson isn't defending the decisions. Absolutely ludicrous bias towards Liverpool in the Wolves game and today.
https://www.espn.com/soccer/english...a-konate-somehow-escape-red-cards-at-brighton
Football is such a joke these days...
Just get the decision right. The referee missed a red card offence. A really, really obvious one but it shouldn't matter and should be the same if its marginal. Var can fix it, so fix it. Why complicate shit?Really struggling with the thought process around the Konate one. The criteria they should run through should have went like:
Bizarre.
- Is it shoulder-to-shoulder? No. He's' just behind McCallister, rather than side-on. It's Konate's hip into McCallister's back and his arm into his shoulder and neck.
- Did he collect the ball in the process of making the challenge? No. McCallister takes the touch with his thigh. Konate needs to be able to reach the ball in making the challenge, but McCallister's touch means he would have to make a new movement in another direction to go back towards the ball.
- Is it a goalscoring opportunity? Yes. McCallister kept it in control and he's 1v1 with the goalkeeper.
Just to bring some diversity in the thread, one positive thing that has come about from VAR is the drastic reduction in blatant dives that were awarded as penalties. Naturally, VAR has created some frustrations of its own but at least players don't get away with clear cheating.
My thoughts entirelyStill struggling with the idea these things are all just an astonishingly endless sequence of accidental incidents of incompetence, as opposed to by design.
Four inexplicable VAR decisions I've seen in the last 3 weeks that can't be explained away by subjectiveness or an official simply making a mistake....and they've all been in the FA Cup, and they've all been game altering decisions in favour of the exact same team....who are so ahite they've managed to end up going out anyway...and even then the officials did their best to hunt down a non existent reason to rule out the winning goal.
This just wouldn't be getting tolerated in any other sport and probably not in football in any other country either...well except Italy, but even there eventually they get caught out and have to do something about it
Fabinho: PGMOL accepts Liverpool's should have been sent off for Evan Ferguson tackle - https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/64461183
Bollocks decisions like that, cameras not being able to see angles on opposition goals, offside goals like Salah's.Fabinho: PGMOL accepts Liverpool's should have been sent off for Evan Ferguson tackle - https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/64461183
VAR is fecking shit. Maybe with smarter people using it, it would work but we've got morons using it so it's crap.
You get just as many stupid decisions from the officials but now with the extra failure of no longer being able to celebrate a goal properly for fear they'll find someones toenail was offside in the build up to it.