I think their explanation will be that it wasn’t a clear & obvious error
Isn't clear and obvious only a PL edict anyway? So don't think that even applies here.
I think their explanation will be that it wasn’t a clear & obvious error
It infuriates me that no one or nothing holds referees accountable. It is so injust, very weird in times like these.
They will be officiating the next match as if nothing has happened.
Just nothing happens, and if you complain or mention it, you are sanctioned.My blood is boiling thinking about them getting away with it. It’s a disgrace.
There isn't people on here will say the reason that VAR doesn't work is because it's English refs viewing the VAR. Tonight it wasn't English refs. We don't need to slow the game down just to have people sitting in a studio making egregious decisions rather than the ref on the pitch making them. Until there is a time that AI can make calls that are 99% accurate without human interference they need to scrap this shite.If that isn't clear and obvious then there isn't a point of having VAR
I don't agree.VAR isn't perfect but very much necessary.
Any game you watch without VAR is just crap, the amount of mistakes and injustice is staggering. It is annoying in days like this sure, but it drastically lowers the amount of errors made.
I can imagine if you are a match-going fan, because you see less footage and VAR-checks are quite disrupting.I don't agree.
The clear and obvious is not there all the time. Arsenals disallowed goal against us. I think Eriksen was fouled enough to give him a free kick. But the ref was just a few metres away and had perfect view of the situation and chose to not blow his whistle. Yet he changed his mind when he saw the replay. I doubt he could have seen anything new there, he was just a coward in the first place.The whole “clear and obvious” thing is there to protect the referees, not to ensure the call is made correctly. The whole thing feels like a ridiculous half-measure that only serves to create as much controversy as it solves.
Absolutely not, watch football played all the time without VAR and it's a blast. That said the rules regarding this non handball are absolutely clear this is just another ref doing what ever the feck he wants.VAR isn't perfect but very much necessary.
Any game you watch without VAR is just crap, the amount of mistakes and injustice is staggering. It is annoying in days like this sure, but it drastically lowers the amount of errors made.
Offside could be done by AI the same way that goal line technology is done but the refs wont give up control. This is half of the problem with VAR.I can imagine if you are a match-going fan, because you see less footage and VAR-checks are quite disrupting.
But if you want games full of offside goals, handballs getting missed or playing using their hands leading up to scoring, missed red cards. That's your own I guess.
And that ref doing whatever he wants is VAR. Until we take the human element out it should be scraped.Absolutely not, watch football played all the time without VAR and it's a blast. That said the rules regarding this non handball are absolutely clear this is just another ref doing what ever the feck he wants.
Fair enough, I hate matches without VAR. Most of the significant errors could be reduced. Wasn't it in one of the first seasons of the VAR where they had to bring VAR in the knockouts of either the EL or another club competition? Group stage was just ridiculous without it.Absolutely not, watch football played all the time without VAR and it's a blast. That said the rules regarding this non handball are absolutely clear this is just another ref doing what ever the feck he wants.
Absolutely, it just boggles the mind really.Fair enough, I hate matches without VAR. Most of the significant errors could be reduced. Wasn't it in one of the first seasons of the VAR where they had to bring VAR in the knockouts of either the EL or another club competition? Group stage was just ridiculous without it.
This was a shocking call though, VAR or no VAR. Having VAR makes it a bit worse.
No VAR has a better record with handballs?Offside could be done by AI the same way that goal line technology is done but the refs wont give up control. This is half of the problem with VAR.
Talking about handballs what about tonight? VAR doesn't have a good record with handball.
Offside is already being done automatically in the CL and the coming WC. It should be adopted in the PL next season.Offside could be done by AI the same way that goal line technology is done but the refs wont give up control. This is half of the problem with VAR.
Talking about handballs what about tonight? VAR doesn't have a good record with handball.
I knew the technology was there and I knew that we hadn't taken it up in the EPL but I didn't realise that EUFA had. The rest of it, until AI can officiate on it I'd forget about it.Offside is already being done automatically in the CL and the coming WC. It should be adopted in the PL next season.
There have been 4 or 5 shocking in less than a week.Is VAR used completely differently in other leagues? That decision tonight was shocking.
They should broadcast on the field screens as to what the official is thinking and the communication between them and the onfield referee. Happens in cricket so why cant in football?Refs aren't held accountable, never have to explain their decisions, UEFA never comments. It's all just so archaic
It was obvious to evryone pre-VAR that you shouldn't rely on the ref's. VAR should have solved that but it hasn't, maybe it's reduced the number of mistakes but not by much. Annoying as it is, the sad truth is that, in most games, if you're talking about the ref you're team hasn't been good enough.
Majority of referee mistakes worthy of true debate have a directly negative impact on a team, which inhibits them to getting a result. What happens after that decision influences the match.
If Arsenal's disallowed goal by Martinelli stood, the game is totally different. United could have comeback and gotten a result, but it still doesn't hide the fact that there was a highly controversial decision that should be examined.
Real Sociedad were as equally as threatening as United were prior to the handball decision. It was unlikely either team was going to score an open play goal, it wasn't a good performance by either team and a draw was more than fair.
But the goal changed the dynamic of the game, as all first goals do.
The referee and VAR made a massive mistake tonight and it had harsh consequences.
Absolutely. I don't like an isolated incident like that distracting us from what was a poor performance. Also, poor form against Spanish teams or not, we beat them 4:0 at their place last time.I'm not saying it's right but we must deal with reality. Sociedad weren't anything special and we've only got ourselves to blame that a stupid decision has cost us the game.
Absolutely. I don't like an isolated incident like that distracting us from what was a poor performance. Also, poor form against Spanish teams or not, we beat them 4:0 at their place last time.
VAR isn't perfect but very much necessary.
Any game you watch without VAR is just crap, the amount of mistakes and injustice is staggering.
Everything is relative.So football for 120 years was crap? Have you only just started watching football? I pity you for missing so much thrilling football over the years.
Imagine it was given because Martinez because a "positive action" towards the ball and therefore becomes responsible for it hitting his arm.has there been any explanation offered by pundits/ ex-ref/ whoever on why it was given? I mean- i swear i was sure the rules says that if the ball bounces of a leg/chest/head and hits the arm it's not a peno
We need a VAR for the VAR