Heinzesight
Full Member
VAR hero to zero. Pricks.
Seriously?
I completely disagree, but dont care to argue with some randomer about it. Have a good Sunday.Yes, nothing much challenge, referee about 5 yards away. Doesn't give a foul. VAR shouldn't even review it. The ref should just say he's seen it clearly if they do, thanks. Grow a pair!
VAR isn't for this kind of minor incident. It's ridiculous.
The bar to intervention is far too low. Its meant to be for major mistakes. Not refereeing the game on video.
Also, they're going to investigate the Newcastle and West Ham incidents, but not the Liverpool VVD one. Why!
They're all mistakes and the latter wasn't even reviewed. The ref should certainly have been sent to the monitor for it, leg breaker.
He pushes him over from behind and doesn’t touch the ball. How the deck is it even close to not being a foul?FFS, there's nothing in that and the ref had a good view of it first time around. Could it be a foul, maybe yes, maybe no. VAR shouldn't be involved. Just undermining the referee.
The referee should tell VAR to do one in this situation.
Does this ref have a thread? What’s his name?
He’s gone full Mike Dean bald head & all today.
Arsenal goal has to stand
He pushes him over from behind and doesn’t touch the ball. How the deck is it even close to not being a foul?
If he touches the ball then fair enough but he has to touch it. It’s not even shoulder to shoulder, literally through the back of Eriksen
ie: this goal by Arsenal probably has a small foul in the lead up. I’m sure there is like on every goal. It’s all subjective
Innit, honestly this is VAR actually working and everyone here upset for well, obvious reasons.It’s disappointing that it took a premier league referee three minutes or so to decide that was a foul when it was clear from every angle that it was. Arsenal player backed into Eriksen and did not win the ball. Just one look at the reply should have been enough
He doesn’t throw himself to the ground though, you can see Odegaard literally go through the back of him.It could be a foul, looks like he throws himself to the ground too though. Could not be a foul.
The ref is 5 yards away, sees it clearly, doesn't give it. Ref doesn’t think it is.
That should be the end of it.
Dreadful VAR again. Arsenal goal has to stand and VAR has to look at that challenge on Bruno Fernandes.
The VAR in the Brighton games was as bad. What a weekend.
It’s disappointing that it took a premier league referee three minutes or so to decide that was a foul when it was clear from every angle that it was. Arsenal player backed into Eriksen and did not win the ball. Just one look at the reply should have been enough
It could be a foul, looks like he throws himself to the ground too though. Could not be a foul.
The ref is 5 yards away, sees it clearly, doesn't give it. Ref doesn’t think it is.
That should be the end of it.
Exactly. You could see it was a foul as it happened. I was fecking fuming he played on.VAR wouldn't have gotten involved if the ref did his job. Foul clear as day. But the ref wanted to keep things testy.
Eriksen really is small and not so strong player but that was a clear foul on him and next pass after that foul is for Martinelli who scores.Dreadful VAR again. Arsenal goal has to stand and VAR has to look at that challenge on Bruno Fernandes.
The VAR in the Brighton games was as bad. What a weekend.
Not to mention the leg contact, he challenged him, and got no where near the ball, therefore a foul.That should be an end of referee who doesn't see a foul from 5 yards away.
You do realise that Arsenal player didn't touch or even won the ball at all? He literally went to push Eriksen off the ball, that was his only intention.
Of course it was obvious. Wtf are you on about ?The ref is there on the "foul". He lets play go on and the ref had a perfect view. Those are called fouls and also not called fouls. It was not an obvious mistake. Goal should stand.
The ref is there on the "foul". He lets play go on and the ref had a perfect view. Those are called fouls and also not called fouls. It was not an obvious mistake. Goal should stand.
It is obvious since the ref saw it again and changed his mind.The ref is there on the "foul". He lets play go on and the ref had a perfect view. Those are called fouls and also not called fouls. It was not an obvious mistake. Goal should stand.
The ref is there on the "foul". He lets play go on and the ref had a perfect view. Those are called fouls and also not called fouls. It was not an obvious mistake. Goal should stand.
That's called a foul pretty much every time the ref actually sees what happens. It's a foul. Odegaard pushed him with his arms in the back, and kicked his leg from behind, and didn't get a touch on the ball. What world is the "not a foul". It's a standard foul that is always called without controversy.The ref is there on the "foul". He lets play go on and the ref had a perfect view. Those are called fouls and also not called fouls. It was not an obvious mistake. Goal should stand.
Thing is, if the player had got a nick on the ball as well as taking out Eriksen id probably say they were hard done by and I’d be angry if that was given against us. No bias, i’d say they were really unlucky. But he didn’t get anywhere near it and it’s a clear foul.Innit, honestly this is VAR actually working and everyone here upset for well, obvious reasons.