Drumpf is a changed man now....
Drumpf is a changed man now....
"Sir I've drafted this tweet, are you happy for me to send it?"The capitalisation of PEACE is like the madman within him trying to break through.
I suspect he will do this a couple more times. Put rumour out of a controversial candidate, start going through the process and then either drop the candidate "because of public reaction" or bring a candidate to the table who will be rejected by Senate/House and... we start again. Tactics designed to delay, completely selfish and it will have a profoundly negative effect on the FBI's capabilities and yet he will blame "The Dems" and Liberal Media for blocking him appointing someone and say they are hurting the country and it's unpatriotic.
Thing is, the FBI Director has less meaning now that Bob Mueller and his staff are in action, as well as the fact that the House and Senate committees continue to do their own thing. By the time he gets a new Director in place a vast majority of the information those three entities need will already have been obtained.
He has played a blinder, hasn't he?We finally have a Pope worthy of John Paul I's mantle.
Apparently it's a fake story (check above) about him deleting his Tweets, a shame as I got it from a really respected Canadian journo I follow on Twitter. Or should I say DID follow.
The Pope's being true to what he believes, no doubt. I love Pope Francis, he's amazing (and he usually laughs a lot).He has played a blinder, hasn't he?
http://www.thepoke.co.uk/2017/05/24/donald-trump-met-pope-people-kinds-fun/
Do you not worry you're exemplifying many of the behaviour you criticise Trump supporters for (believing legitimately fake news, jumping all over gossip etc.)?
Yup. Contrast with Hannity still clearly believing the Seth Rich nonsense.It's not about getting duped, it's how you react to hearing the facts. Trump supporters refuse to hold their hands up and continue to peddle misinformation. langster has recognised he's been the victim of misinformation on a number of occasions and held his hands up and apologised for sharing it.
Yeah, he clearly can't pretend for the sake of decorum.The Pope's being true to what he believes, no doubt. I love Pope Francis, he's amazing (and he usually laughs a lot).
What I did not understand is the dresses of the "ladies". Do they think clothes make them to be nuns? Was it a funeral?
It's an old tradition for women to wear black, modest dresses and a veil when having a private audience with the Pope, who is both a Head of State and religious leader. The only exception was for Catholic Queens and their consorts, who could wear white.What I did not understand is the dresses of the "ladies". Do they think clothes make them to be nuns? Was it a funeral?
Doesn't matter if she's Catholic or not. The Vatican has a dress code for meetings with the pope. The Saudis don't, for visitors anyway.Maybe because she's Catholic (?) and not Muslim?
Not that I have high hopes for better options than the ones he has considered by now but there always is hope.
That's an amazing statement. I can't help but always think of how GOP folks would react to things like tis if a Democrat were in the WH.
The scores he gets on intelligence constantly baffle me.Interesting results from Quinnipiac University national poll.
*snip
*snip
- 57 - 40 percent that he is intelligent;
Perhaps they're comparing him to the average American.The scores he gets on intelligence constantly baffle me.
The scores he gets on intelligence constantly baffle me.
The scores he gets on intelligence constantly baffle me.
Successful businessman.
Do you own a skyscraper wth your name on it? Granted, neither does he but the country bumpkins don't know that.Only he's not, is he?
Do you not worry you're exemplifying many of the behaviour you criticise Trump supporters for (believing legitimately fake news, jumping all over gossip etc.)?
British Intelligence services are extremely pissed at Americans for leaking sensitive intelligence from the Manchester bombing. Perhaps not for this thread but I don't remember this sort of shit happening before the Trump Admin.
Edit - 4 News believe it's very unlikely that it came from FBI or CIA - Homeland Security the likely suspect.
It's a major leak, can't believe how the NYTimes had that much information.