- Joined
- Oct 22, 2010
- Messages
- 62,851
It's Rio or Wayne."....... IT'S ME!!"
It's Rio or Wayne."....... IT'S ME!!"
He's replying to comments
So, a random tangent but the fuss over this just seems silly. A man who is proud of his adult daughter for being beautiful isn't a creep. The "jealous?" response is just a snark at the woman who criticised his post, accusing her of being jealous of his daughter's good looks.
Social media witch-hunts are so fecking tiresome. A load of easily offended prats constantly looking for stuff to get indignant about and/or have a clumsy swipe at someone who has different politics to them.
Did you see in the replies where someone compares it in detail to the photo it's a "tribute" to? It's very good.
Go WUM somewhere else...
'When the President says it, it's no longer classified'
So saying that people need to work a little harder and making an effort to overcome obstacles is called Wumming now? I'm done with you as well.
Agree with that. It has become my go to thread as soon as I get on the caf. Seems like every day, there is a wtf coming out of this white house.This is without a doubt the most hilarious and entertaining thread on Caf at the moment. Sorry Americans.
So saying that people need to work a little harder and making an effort to overcome obstacles is called Wumming now? I'm done with you as well.
So saying that people need to work a little harder and making an effort to overcome obstacles is called Wumming now? I'm done with you as well.
Which is true, it's the manner in which he did it, the uneducated decision he made, the damage it is likely to cause, the party in receipt of the intelligence and the implications that has.
Just because it isn't criminal does not make it unbelievably stupid and exempt from criticism or consequence.
Yes, yes it is, in a thread about the US presidency. You were invited to set up a thread on the topic of voter suppression (and the value of hard work if you like). Unless you're too lazy to do that - perhaps you'd like it handed to you on a plate.
Aye, we'll likely see a lot of Western allies of the US really scaling back what they tell Trump out of fear he'll just either blurt it out in public or to someone he shouldn't. As a result his successor, irrespective of their party alignment, will probably have a lot of work to do in order to rebuild relations with allies. Trump came in to "Make America Great Again" but as it stands he's only damaging their international position.
It's not just what they tell Trump, it's what they share with the US. Period. You have to assume that the IC will be briefing Trump on Intelligence to inform his decisions. If they are withholding intelligence for fear of him finding out, he does not have the required intelligence to make informed decisions as Commander in Chief.
If this is what the situation comes to then his job is impossible to carry out effectively and he should be removed.
That's been abundantly clear from Day 1.
That's been abundantly clear from Day 1.
They also implicitly acknowledged it was true when they requested WaPo to withhold certain details (meaning they were sensitive facts).McMaster didn't say that Trump didn't share intelligence with the Russians. He said Trump didn't mention source and methods which intelligence was collected. Basically, McMaster implicitly acknowledged that Trump did reveal intelligence to the Russians.
That's been abundantly clear from Day 1.
Day 1 = the day he was conceived?
He's a wanker, it's a real shame his dad wasn't
Oh he was.
Racist, slum landlord crook as well. Just like donnie.
So saying that people need to work a little harder and making an effort to overcome obstacles is called Wumming now? I'm done with you as well.
I wanted to explain...but explaining would have ruined it....oh well, I laughed - so there is thatYeah, I know, but that wasn't the.............. ahhh never mind.
So saying that people need to work a little harder and making an effort to overcome obstacles is called Wumming now? I'm done with you as well.
I wanted to explain...but explaining would have ruined it....oh well, I laughed - so there is that
I've ignored a lot of what you've said so far, but I feel the need to point out at this point (and this may have already been stated), but making it "a little harder" for some citizens than others to do something they absolutely have the right to do is the definition of discrimination.So saying that people need to work a little harder and making an effort to overcome obstacles is called Wumming now? I'm done with you as well.
I don't find him convincing. Not the slightest.McMaster towing the party line pretty well...but his response is such bullshit
that's because he doesn't believe what he's sayingI don't find him convincing. Not the slightest.
I've ignored a lot of what you've said so far, but I feel the need to point out at this point (and this may have already been stated), but making it "a little harder" for some citizens than others to do something they absolutely have the right to do is the definition of discrimination.