Deleted member 78215
Guest
Trumo FTW, wabba lubba dub dub.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39461869
Video of Trump leaving the oval office before signing the EOs
When appearing on a daytime TV show with Ivanka when asked what he had in common with his daughter he replied "well I would say SEX" and then tried to laugh it off. He's also said he would be dating her if she wasn't his daughter. He's a disgusting piece of shit. The fact he got elected made me lose a lot of faith in humanity, it's actually like a bad dream really, he's just so thick and ignorant, but not only that he's so fecking nasty and spiteful. I despise the fat cnut.
Stone is such a slimy unhinged character.
It's ok, they really don't need to fake pictures of him and his daughter.
The party of family values...
@Billy Blaggs @langster It is beyond me how any human being can vote for someone who speaks that way about his daughter, and it wasn't just a lapse when he was drunk, he said it repeatedly. How can all these so-called Christians tolerate that, how can any person with moral fibre tolerate that?
Although I disagree with most of Twitlers agenda topics, I can understand that people have different opinions and convictions, lack knowledge or intellectual capacity to process knowledge. But I had wrongly hoped that there is consensus across opinions, convictions and party lines about a certain level of integrity of a president. Twitler's integrity on a scale from 0 to 10 is -10,000. Putin must be laughing his a** off.
Me either. I have a daughter and she is a person all the boys like.
To me she's just that annoying little shit that beats up my stove.
It's repulsive that a dad could refer to his daughter like that.
"Me either. I have a daughter and she is a person all the boys like.
To me she's just that annoying little shit that beats up my stove.
It's repulsive that a dad could refer to his daughter like that." - Carly Rae Jepsen.
Fully agree wih your first two paragraphs. At the G20, however, he'll meet his pals Putin and Erdogan and possibly Le Pen if she gets elected (G20 is early July, I assume whoever gets elected will have taken office by then). Therefore he'll look forward to it and only wish that Berlusconi would still be around to exchange groping experience.http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39461869
Just look at the way he slinks off, what the hell? I am no body language expert, but that does not look like a confident man to me. We all know hes a narcissist with an overblown ego, but also a thin skin, so no doubt with all the bad press around, this is starting to get to him.
He did not really knew what he was getting into. He loved the campaign, because then he could just spout his bullshit to an adoring crowd, but the actual presidency and the inevitable scrutiny that followed with it, not so much. Those post inauguration rallies must have been just for the sake of a morale boosts, and if this continues there will be a lot of rallies i suppose.
Also, considering how hamfisted he has handled his meeting with other states of head, i can't imagine he is looking forward to the G7/G20 meetings. Will probably call a sicky
Wonder if our American friends can suggest when we should get the popcorn in? I even dreamt last night that Trump resigned. Waiting and waiting....or do you reckon he will last the term?
What he means (as he has said it many times before) is he wishes to try to copy the libel laws we have here in the UK. However, as I have said numerous times, if he does the person who would suffer the most would be him, Donald Trump. Basically it would allow people to sue newspapers who tell lies or who get their facts wrong all the time. Trump thinks that he's always right, however surely that must be more bullshit, surely deep down he must know he's lying all the time? Whatever, if the rules changed and he then didn't like stories printed by say the lying New York Times and the dishonest Washington Post or he didn't like stories broadcast by crooked CNN then he would attempt to sue them, however, as we all know they would have been telling the truth and as the accuser the onus would be entirely on Trump to prove they had lied. Of course he couldn't do that, and even if he tried then the publications being sued would just play the video tape of Trump bullshitting. Basically yet again the prick really doesn't understand what he is saying.
Unless he manages to make the burden of proof on the media organisation and limits it to media organisations. IE unless you have proof for a story it's slander/libel, which would curtail the press.
The thing is we know Trump would love to go beyond British libel laws
Stone is such a slimy unhinged character.
Supposedly next on the agenda: Bring more Breitbart staff in the WH to draw conclusions from raw intel data.
these so-called experts with their bloody "reality" eh, makes it a damn sight more difficult to run a bloody good autocracy these days
As I recall it, he said she's a voluptuous piece of ass and if he wasn't happily married and her father and then let the listeners fill the blank.
Documents released by the White House have revealed millions of dollars in assets held by its senior staff.
President Trump's daughter Ivanka and her husband, Jared Kushner, have assets valued between $240m and $740m (£191m- £590m).
Funny how noone's tried an April Fools in here. I guess the reality is just far stranger than any fiction could be
I don't think Mensch is helping at all. She's constantly click-baiting on this story without providing anything new or any proof to back-up her claims, and she just comes across as a bit of a crack-pot.
Fed up with experts.
These are the same people who agreed with the mother of the Duggar family when she said that her daughters wouldn't be seriously affected by repeated sexual assaults by their brother because they were asleep at the time. Hypocritical scumbags, you can tell by the porn consumption in red states and the conveyor belt of wanking material on Fox News.@Billy Blaggs @langster It is beyond me how any human being can vote for someone who speaks that way about his daughter, and it wasn't just a lapse when he was drunk, he said it repeatedly. How can all these so-called Christians tolerate that, how can any person with moral fibre tolerate that?
Although I disagree with most of Twitlers agenda topics, I can understand that people have different opinions and convictions, lack knowledge or intellectual capacity to process knowledge. But I had wrongly hoped that there is consensus across opinions, convictions and party lines about a certain level of integrity of a president. Twitler's integrity on a scale from 0 to 10 is -10,000. Putin must be laughing his a** off.
Its clearly an orchestrate strategy to deflect from his own investigation.
It's so transparent though. His following will blindly shout it out, some believing it, some just happy to use it. The media isn't running with it though because their is no foundation to it, not because of some neo-liberal agenda. If there was a story there, they'd be rolling with it parallel to the Russian story because despite what they are trying to argue, one being true doesn't absolve the other.