Guys I can't see my tagline has it changed yet?
The Trump Presidency | Biden Inaugurated
- Thread starter Raoul
- Start date
- Status
Has @Billy Blaggs started howling?
We don't hate his supporters, there is no way to like or dislike them. What we do is dislike the uninformed opinions that they share.
you must be proud
so you say. the truth is you're just biased
No mate. Why do you want your tagline changed?
Our reactions have been to the stupidity and lies being posted, hasn't it?
I believe the great *********** Jamie Vardy had an apt phrase last year for this situation.
Obviously I'm biased. Who isn't?
You know, you've admitted just a little while ago that you're not informed enough to understand what our biases could even be, or be based on.
Stop digging, dude.
Just wanted to mention - unlike others in here, I dislike Trump voters and quite vocally. I have unfriended 4 people on fb and have stopped speaking with a friend who admitted to voting for Trump.
In fact, I don't care if disliking them is my 'liberal east coast elitist arrogance' - and I don't care, if not 'understanding' them, will result in them winning more elections.
So be it.
In fact, I don't care if disliking them is my 'liberal east coast elitist arrogance' - and I don't care, if not 'understanding' them, will result in them winning more elections.
So be it.
Stop digging, dude.[/QUOTE]
you keep referring to the same thing all the time. keep bringing up the uninformed issue coz you don't have an argument. bias has nothing to do with being informed or uninformed. and I know I'm right when I say you guys are biased although you guys can convince yourselves otherwise if you wish
you keep referring to the same thing all the time. keep bringing up the uninformed issue coz you don't have an argument. bias has nothing to do with being informed or uninformed. and I know I'm right when I say you guys are biased although you guys can convince yourselves otherwise if you wish
"Enough deraileramentism! Get back to talking about ME!"
an honest reply. i try not to be
But the entire concept of a 2 tiered Congress is based on weighing the interests of the populous states vs the interests of the smaller states, who threatened to not join the Union if representation was solely based on population, with no regard for the limited sovereignty of each state (cf. Connecticut Compromise). States, unlike territories or counties in other countries, are for the most part soveriegn entities. The Feds only step in when defense, interstate affairs, foreign policy and basic constitutional rights are involved. I get uncomfortable when states rights is mentioned, but it's a real concept. That structure extends to the electoral college.
I agree that Wyoming is not the equal of CA or NY. Few states are. But the system is such that a successful candidate can't cherry pick the largest states in terms of population. From a liberal perspective, it would be better if carrying the coasts were enough to secure an election, and we'd probably be more advanced now. But that's not democracy, right?
you keep referring to the same thing all the time. keep bringing up the uninformed issue coz you don't have an argument. bias has nothing to do with being informed or uninformed. and I know I'm right when I say you guys are biased although you guys can convince yourselves otherwise if you wish[/QUOTE]
Lollllll
This is coming from the guy who wouldn't comment on the most important thing on that list earlier, the thing that everyone in this thread is terrified about, because you weren't informed enough.
The sound of scraping? That's the barrel bottom.
another honest person. thank you. i mean relationships have fallen apart because of trump and brexit.
You realize that ultimately it's not possible and that this thread clearly shows that you are not unbiased.
Also, who cares? It's a deflection and not an answer to the questions that have been posed to him.
Lollllll
This is coming from the guy who wouldn't comment on the most important thing on that list earlier, the thing that everyone in this thread is terrified about, because you weren't informed enough.
The sound of scraping? That's the barrel bottom.[/QUOTE]
just you. didn't and still doesn't seem that important. Also you being terrified is an exaggeration.
You're not doing well at that...
Are you here to wum or are you going to answer the questions some posters took the time to ask on the last few pages...
See, you say that because you haven't been reading this thread.
Perhaps check out the hashtag #presidentbannon on Twitter and see if all the posts are by me?
What was the word again? Un something...
Sorry. In general I try not to be. But you're right. I support trump and am probably biased. But that's because I'm convinced that the establishment failed so at this point there is no other alternative.
What does this mean? Expand please...
It's extremely important to realize when you are partisan. In the case of our friend, he is either a liar or he has cognitive issues. No one is going to debate about politics neutrally, you can eventually try to comment it but you can't be on one side of the debate and stay neutral.
Bit of a sweeping generalization there. I like my dad, uncle, and brother, even though they voted for Trump. I like my friends at work, even though they voted for Trump. I just think their political opinion is the worst aspect of their character.
What the establishment failed to do, exactly? And what are the answers provided by Trump to solve that problem?
there fixed it
Meh, you can prove anything with facts
I'll add too that I've maintained friendships with Trump voters. My bias is as multifaceted as people claim Trump voters to be, and focusses more on what the man himself, his acolytes and more racist supporters SAY rather than on people.
For your entertainment...
'Come meet President Donald $ Trump, champion of the common man, this Saturday at the Subbuteo Stadium, Florida! Tickets $4000 per head, free hotdog and cap. No blacks, foreigners or dogs.'
So did you check it, or would you like to go to the trouble of typing out another smarmy unrelated and, yes, uninformed reply?
oh no you didn't, seriously ..... just no.....
no and I won't. doesn't seem that important to me. you guys are just exaggerating. i find it entertaining
Was I not supposed to ask you for further details? Oh is this not how it works in your world?
Well, now that, would explain a lot...
Trump as anti-establishment. Oh the irony.
- Status