The Trump Presidency | Biden Inaugurated

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fox & Fiends said:
From our correspondent Anna Key in the UK: "People say that President Trump is down on women and is very mean with money; but that's not my experience at all..."

*cut to filmed interview*

TRUMP: "I bought along a little gift for you."
ANNA: "Oh my! What is it?"
TRUMP: "It's the skin off my sh*t."
Click to expand...
 
uh huh....
0b7b336ad7904359e212b0540b2b2e27.jpg


#JustSaying...
 
Since it's obvious @Alex Styles has no knowledge of how the US government works, has no ability to discern lies from slip ups, no seemingly basic math skills, and no real intention of having a discussion, can a mod do everyone a favor and threadban this WUM? Seriously, anyone who replies with a fecking Ghandi tumblr post is clearly incapable of offering anything intelligent to say.
 
Seriously, not one of these guys have come out with anything engaging. Might as well be bots... All saying the same misguided things and swerving opposition, and we are supposed to believe they are nuanced? That there is more to to them? Fcuk em...

Don't ban him tho btw...
 
JustAFan said:
Trump as anti-establishment. Oh the irony.
Click to expand...

It's crazy when you think about it because he is the establishment. For some reason people think that the establishment is synonym to politicians or high ranked state servants, they don't think about the lobbyists, he is one them and he is surrounded by them.
 
SaintTresano said:
Since it's obvious @Alex Styles has no knowledge of how the US government works, has no ability to discern lies from slip ups, no seemingly basic math skills, and no real intention of having a discussion, can a mod do everyone a favor and threadban this WUM? Seriously, anyone who replies with a fecking Ghandi tumblr post is clearly incapable of offering anything intelligent to say.
Click to expand...

I think I'm more patient than most, but I think he's just demonstrated he's being wilfully ignorant. I've no time for that.
 
What has happened to this thread? I don't check in for a day and suddenly some illiterate Trump bot has gone on a multi-page trolling spree? :confused:
 
Fixed:
SaintTresano said:
Since it's obvious Alex Styles has no knowledge of how the US government works, has no ability to discern lies from slip ups, no seemingly basic math skills, and no real intention of having a discussion, why isn't he President?
Click to expand...
 
Alex Styles said:
no and I won't. doesn't seem that important to me. you guys are just exaggerating. i find it entertaining
Click to expand...

The wannabe Milo of Redcafe, Exhibit A

Why see what someone is basing their argument on, after they've handed it to you on a plate, when instead you can ignore it for "entertainment".
 
Kaos said:
What has happened to this thread? I don't check in for a day and suddenly some illiterate Trump bot has gone on a multi-page trolling spree? :confused:
Click to expand...
I believe it happens every ###... You could probably set your watch to it. In light of a documentary I watched about how groups of people use posts and up-down votes to shape discussion and perception, I wouldn't be surprised if one or 2 off these guys were phony. If it wasn't for the piss poor job they are doing...
 
Seriously though...for the moment, the worst thing about Trump has to be his 'supporters' - especially far right loonies from places like Europe and Australia.

We know what it is about him you like - your pathetic attempts to tip toe around it...fools no one. :lol:
 
SaintTresano said:
Since it's obvious @Alex Styles has no knowledge of how the US government works, has no ability to discern lies from slip ups, no seemingly basic math skills, and no real intention of having a discussion, can a mod do everyone a favor and threadban this WUM? Seriously, anyone who replies with a fecking Ghandi tumblr post is clearly incapable of offering anything intelligent to say.
Click to expand...

That's by far the worst and most inappropriate post in this thread. Talk about taking it too far. Bad enough that everyone here is ganging up on me for having an opinion. If anyone should be threadbanned it's you. But i'll excuse myself since I'm not welcome here. You can also feel free to feck off.
 
JPRouve said:
I read your posts on that subject and keep asking myself, why the US would do that? What would they gain from it? And do you realize that Russia aren't afraid of the US, like not at all?
Click to expand...
Because the US supports Assad's enemies. And can you really look at USA's military inventory and tell me anyone isn't afraid of them?

Raoul said:
There is obviously not going to be a military repercussion about going into Syria. It was Putin's gamble to obfuscate from domestic economic problems. You don't have to get into a military conflict with Russia to hurt them. There are obviously different levels of sanctions that can be gradually ratcheted up to impose penalties on Putin for his behavior.
Click to expand...
Clinton was talking about setting up a no-fly zone around Aleppo, I'm pretty sure military conflict was on the cards. Maybe Russia was hurt economically by the sanctions but the bottom line is 10 years from now Crimea will be part of Russia and Assad or someone of his ilk will be President of Syria.

2cents said:
One could argue that the Ukraine crisis represents a net loss for Putin - he had a reliably pro-Moscow guy in charge, only to lose him. He's only regained the Crimea and a small part of the east since. But in any case, was Bush as weak in 2008 as you think Obama was for allowing Russia to invade Georgina?

What we have to understand is that with the brief exception of the 90s, Russia has for centuries, and for understandable reasons of security, dominated the countries on its immediate frontier. Doing so is the top national security objective for any regime in Moscow, whoever runs it. Likewise, Moscow has for two hundred years maintained an interest in the Middle East, and its involvement in Syria is simply Russia re-exerting herself after a brief hiatus.

Conversely, Ukraine, Georgia, and to a lesser extent Syria, are just not high priority national security interests for the USA, no matter who is in charge in DC.
Click to expand...
Possibly, but Bush was also tied up in Afghanistan and Iraq at the time, I suspect were it not for the timing the US response may have been more robust. The difference between that and Syria is that we were already in Syria, our interest and operations very real, Russia's jumping in and bombing of our allies in Aleppo after outsourcing IS to us was so flagrant in our faces that it can only have been born out of our perceived weakness.
 
Alex Styles said:
That's by far the worst and most inappropriate post in this thread. Talk about taking it too far. Bad enough that everyone here is ganging up on me for having an opinion. If anyone should be threadbanned it's you. But i'll excuse myself since I'm not welcome here. You can also feel free to feck off.
Click to expand...

Snowflake?

People are arguing with you about your proudly wilfully ignorant opinions.
 
Alex Styles said:
That's by far the worst and most inappropriate post in this thread. Talk about taking it too far. Bad enough that everyone here is ganging up on me for having an opinion. If anyone should be threadbanned it's you. But i'll excuse myself since I'm not welcome here. You can also feel free to feck off.
Click to expand...
Boo fcukin hoo.... If you had shown a willingness to engage it wouldn't have played out this way. You going to run back to your safe space now?
 
afrocentricity said:
Was I not supposed to ask you for further details? Oh is this not how it works in your world?

Well, now that, would explain a lot...
Click to expand...
Yea, I learned a very important thing while I was in England. you may have heard of it. it's called Google. It has answers
 
Alex Styles said:
Yea, I learned a very important thing while I was in England. you may have heard of it. it's called Google. It has answers
Click to expand...

So use it!

Honest question - are you a teenager? Discourse here functions at a higher level. Look at @endless_wheelies tonight. Get with it or stop spamming this thread.
 
Neutral said:
Seriously though...for the moment, the worst thing about Trump has to be his 'supporters' - especially far right loonies from places like Europe and Australia.

We know what it is about him you like - your pathetic attempts to tip toe around it...fools no one. :lol:
Click to expand...

To be fair to aussies, he probably reminds them their country and its ochre soils.
 
afrocentricity said:
Boo fcukin hoo.... If you had shown a willingness to engage it wouldn't have played out this way. You going to run back to your safe space now?
Click to expand...
willingness to engage in what? if you don't know why the establishment failed, then why the hell is trump president?? ignorant much?
 
Alex Styles said:
Yea, I learned a very important thing while I was in England. you may have heard of it. it's called Google. It has answers
Click to expand...
:lol:

Usually people explain themselves on a discussion forum, especially when they feel like they have something valid or important to say. When someone posts a half arsed post and then resorts to requesting people use Google to make sense of it you can assume they have no conviction or substance.

Alex Styles said:
willingness to engage in what? if you don't know why the establishment failed, then why the hell is trump president?? ignorant much?
Click to expand...
Ermm... Wtf?
Is this your idea of engaging?
 
Alex Styles said:
Sorry. In general I try not to be. But you're right. I support trump and am probably biased. But that's because I'm convinced that the establishment failed so at this point there is no other alternative.
Click to expand...
I understand that you've probably felt like everyone has an axe to grind against you in this thread and going by the attention you've had I wouldn't blame you.

I have just 1 question though, what do you and other self confessed Trump supporters mean by "the establishment"? Who exactly are you referring to?
 
endless_wheelies said:
Clinton was talking about setting up a no-fly zone around Aleppo, I'm pretty sure military conflict was on the cards. Maybe Russia was hurt economically by the sanctions but the bottom line is 10 years from now Crimea will be part of Russia and Assad or someone of his ilk will be President of Syria.
Click to expand...

There's a massive difference between campaign bluster and actually implementing something when Russian aviation and air defenses already controlled the area.
 
@Alex Styles What do you think of Trump relying heavily on Steve Bannon, considering Bannon is a white supremacist who advocates for the destruction of the state? Additionally, what do you think of Trump's destructive environmental plans, and his denial of the scientific consensus regarding climate change?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.