The Trump Presidency | Biden Inaugurated

Status
Not open for further replies.
Since it's obvious @Alex Styles has no knowledge of how the US government works, has no ability to discern lies from slip ups, no seemingly basic math skills, and no real intention of having a discussion, can a mod do everyone a favor and threadban this WUM? Seriously, anyone who replies with a fecking Ghandi tumblr post is clearly incapable of offering anything intelligent to say.
Na man. We don't want to start thread banning people for expressing their opinions (as long as they aren't racist/homophobic/personal attacks), we'd be no better than pro Trump sites such as r/donald which ban people on the flimsiest pretences.
 
I explained my theory. I presented the basis of it. You ignored it, refused to check out what I presented wummed and insulted me. I read your articles already. Over to you.
I get the impression he's the sort of guy that would not click on a link if he thought the info it lead to might shake up his ideology...
 
@Alex Styles What do you think of Trump relying heavily on Steve Bannon, considering Bannon is a white supremacist who advocates for the destruction of the state? Additionally, what do you think of Trump's destructive environmental plans, and his denial of the scientific consensus regarding climate change?

He doesn't believe in acknowledging reality in relation to this. He said he doesn't believe it's important and would rather ignore it for his entertainment.
 
That's the type of question that gets swerved mate...

If you can't attack it with a dose of whataboutism, or label it fake news. They won't even see it. Post? What post?
 
endless_wheelies said:
The difference between that and Syria is that we were already in Syria, our interest and operations very real, Russia's jumping in and bombing of our allies in Aleppo after outsourcing IS to us was so flagrant in our faces that it can only have been born out of our perceived weakness.

Nah despite Obama's 'red line' nonsense, which was definitely a massive blunder, America's involvement in Syria since 2011 has never been particularly decisive. American policy in Syria has been very destructive but not in the way I think you believe it to have been.

What do you mean by Russia outsourcing IS to you?
 
Sorry. In general I try not to be. But you're right. I support trump and am probably biased. But that's because I'm convinced that the establishment failed so at this point there is no other alternative.

Alex, I've not been involved in this mess tonight and don't have much interaction with Trump supporters so could you please enlighten me and explain this point? Not trolling, just want to know why you think the establishment failed. Apologies if you've answered this.
 
Alex, I've not been involved in this mess tonight and don't have much interaction with Trump supporters so could you please enlighten me and explain this point? Not trolling, just want to know why you think the establishment failed. Apologies if you've answered this.

Even if someone thinks the establishment has 'failed,' they're largely operating in denial if they think Trump isn't the establishment.
 
He doesn't believe in acknowledging reality in relation to this. He said he doesn't believe it's important and would rather ignore it for his entertainment.

Probably. But I want an answer. Anyone supporting Trump should have to justify Bannon's inclusion, even though I'd argue it's impossible to do so. Similar to climate change...although the typical excuse for that is that it's somehow not real, and all the scientists have their own agenda.
 
I understand that you've probably felt like everyone has an axe to grind against you in this thread and going by the attention you've had I wouldn't blame you.

I have just 1 question though, what do you and other self confessed Trump supporters mean by "the establishment"? Who exactly are you referring to?
The way I see it is current government (pre trump) and the ones before along with their policies. Also, giant corporations such as the pharmaceutical industries, universities are considered part of the establishment. Establishments come and go. One day Trump and the republicans may be the establishment but right now they are the change. Capitalism is the establishment. The EU is the establishment, brexit is the change. There's more I guess one could write an article about it. Some are confused by this, for example the band greenday still sing about anti-establishment but they were urging people to vote for Hillary (that was confusing).
 
Na man. We don't want to start thread banning people for expressing their opinions (as long as they aren't racist/homophobic/personal attacks), we'd be no better than pro Trump sites such as r/donald which ban people on the flimsiest pretences.
Don't really want to get involved in the ban discussion, we have admins and mods for that kind of stuff...But, being racist, homophobic and personal attacks aren't the only dis-qualifiers.

Trolling and being deliberately obtuse (trying to be nice here and avoid a personal attack lol) are also potential problems.
 
Probably. But I want an answer. Anyone supporting Trump should have to justify Bannon's inclusion, even though I'd argue it's impossible to do so. Similar to climate change...although the typical excuse for that is that it's somehow not real, and all the scientists have their own agenda.

Not probably, what I wrote was his reply to me on the matter.
 
Alex, I've not been involved in this mess tonight and don't have much interaction with Trump supporters so could you please enlighten me and explain this point? Not trolling, just want to know why you think the establishment failed. Apologies if you've answered this.

The question has been asked and ignored, twice.
 
The way I see it is current government (pre trump) and the ones before along with their policies. Also, giant corporations such as the pharmaceutical industries, universities are considered part of the establishment. Establishments come and go. One day Trump and the republicans may be the establishment but right now they are the change. Capitalism is the establishment. The EU is the establishment, brexit is the change. There's more I guess one could write an article about it. Some are confused by this, for example the band greenday still sing about anti-establishment but they were urging people to vote for Hillary (that was confusing).

I struggle to see how one could argue Trump's regime is change when the vast majority of those within it are the same Republicans who've been around for decades.

And again, how do you justify the inclusion of white supremacist Steve Bannon, whose goal is the destruction of the state? And how do you justify Trump's dangerous climate change beliefs?
 
The question has been asked and ignored, twice.
I've answered it already but I thought that the people asking it were WUMS. It seems such an obvious thing that why would I need to explain that. I mean I barely have time to read posts here.
 
It's crazy how similar their posting styles are... We need a scientific name for it, they must be studied.
 
I've answered it already but I thought that the people asking it were WUMS. It seems such an obvious thing that why would I need to explain that. I mean I barely have time to read posts here.

Since it's obvious just tell me quickly. How the establishment failed and how Trump who is the personification of capitalism is the change when you consider capitalism as the establishment?
 
I struggle to see how one could argue Trump's regime is change when the vast majority of those within it are the same Republicans who've been around for decades.

And again, how do you justify the inclusion of white supremacist Steve Bannon, whose goal is the destruction of the state? And how do you justify Trump's dangerous climate change beliefs?
I get your points about the vast majority of republicans, but can you honestly say that Trump does not represent change? All one has to do is look around.
Trump's dangerous Climate change beliefs. I agree with those beliefs. Geo engineering has more to do with climate change than CO2.
 
I get your points about the vast majority of republicans, but can you honestly say that Trump does not represent change? All one has to do is look around.
Trump's dangerous Climate change beliefs. I agree with those beliefs. Geo engineering has more to do with climate change than CO2.

That belief you quote is literally what people used to think before, you know, science. It's not change , it's regression.
 
@Cheesy I'm pretty sure he doesn't even know who Bannon is at this point
He seems alright

What are you guys on about him wanting to destroy the state?
Anyway I've just seen two articles on bannon, one which makes him out to be perfect and one which villifies him.
 
I get your points about the vast majority of republicans, but can you honestly say that Trump does not represent change? All one has to do is look around.
Trump's dangerous Climate change beliefs. I agree with those beliefs. Geo engineering has more to do with climate change than CO2.

Could you elaborate on your agreement with Trump on the matter, even though he is disputing at least 97% of the scientific community? Additionally, can you justify the inclusion of white supremacist Steve Bannon, whose goal is for the destruction of the state? Do you not agree Bannon's inclusion may be extremely dangerous for those of minorities Bannon does not approve of? Thanks.
 
Sorry. In general I try not to be. But you're right. I support trump and am probably biased. But that's because I'm convinced that the establishment failed so at this point there is no other alternative.

So you voted for a complete incompetent instead of someone who at least knows what she is doing? Not to mention that this whole last decade and a half has been shit because of the last incompetent moron you lot voted in.
 
Last edited:
Even if someone thinks the establishment has 'failed,' they're largely operating in denial if they think Trump isn't the establishment.
they want a shift in policies and how politics is done. You can decide if he delivers that. If not: Why all the drama? If yes: well, thats what his voters want.
 
Could you elaborate on your agreement with Trump on the matter, even though he is disputing at least 97% of the scientific community? Additionally, can you justify the inclusion of white supremacist Steve Bannon, whose goal is for the destruction of the state? Do you not agree Bannon's inclusion may be extremely dangerous for those of minorities Bannon does not approve of? Thanks.

What's the evidence for Bannon being a white supremacist?
 
He seems alright

What are you guys on about him wanting to destroy the state?
Anyway I've just seen two articles on bannon, one which makes him out to be perfect and one which villifies him.

Then we had a long talk about his approach to politics. He never called himself a “populist” or an “American nationalist,” as so many think of him today. “I’m a Leninist,” Bannon proudly proclaimed.

Shocked, I asked him what he meant.

“Lenin,” he answered, “wanted to destroy the state, and that’s my goal too. I want to bring everything crashing down, and destroy all of today’s establishment.” Bannon was employing Lenin’s strategy for Tea Party populist goals. He included in that group the Republican and Democratic Parties, as well as the traditional conservative press.

The 'alright' Bannon (you missed a 't' after the 'l') advocates the destruction of the state, something which would have harmful consequences for the vast majority of America.
 
What's the evidence for Bannon being a white supremacist?

His close association with the alt-right movement qualifies, considering the alt-right themselves have often proudly embraced the mantle of white supremacism. Some will disagree on the term but I'd argue it applies to Bannon, or at least he has helped to fuel such movements.
 
The 'alright' Bannon (you missed a 't' after the 'l') advocates the destruction of the state, something which would have harmful consequences for the vast majority of America.
yea i know he's alt-right

that's your view though. he said destroy the establishment not the state
 
Status
Not open for further replies.