The fact it's taken him so long to tweet that pretty poor deflection show he's sweating over this one.
The Trump Presidency | Biden Inaugurated
- Thread starter Raoul
- Start date
- Status
The fact it's taken him so long to tweet that pretty poor deflection show he's sweating over this one.
I might have agreed 4 month ago, but now the status-quo doesn’t look so terrible anymore.
Isn’t Priebus the intermediary between the republicans in house and senat and the administration? Can they get rid of him without losing support from the republican party in parliament?
There never used to be an agenda. That's the issue. They were a tool for anyone and everyone to leak data. They now pick and choose what data is released to fit their own political goals.
Currently Assange is aligned with Russia and Trump so that's how WL is shaping their leaks.
Priebus is very close with Ryan, they're both from Wisconsin and have known eachother for years. That said, I don't think Trump cares much about that. He probably wants more of an aggressive personality like Christie to parrot his own views rather than Priebus' calmer more moderate tone. Ultimately, if Trump isn't comfortable with someone, they aren't likely to be around for much longer. I would put Spicer in the same boat.
Yeah I used to be completely behind wikileaks but I don't trust it at all now. It's changed from a tool to aid transparency and hold power to account into a propaganda machine and its social media team spends more time fuelling Assange's victim complex than actually leaking anything.
I don't think Christie will be pulled back into the fold - not the 1st time I've been wrong, but just can't see it atm.
I suppose you need to believe they leak what they get
I cannot see attention whores like wikileaks holding anything back as long as it will create headlines
Do you think they should not have released the Hilary emails?
You are right, but the administration needs at least one influential person, who connects them with Senat&House. Pence is doing this probably in part, but he is VP, which puts him in a difficult position. Trump might throw a tantrum, but in the end he needs the support of the party. Bannon and Trump are imo walking a fine line and they need to be careful not to overstep it. Trump won’t survive 4 years, if he alienates the party leaders. Personally I would be surprised if Priebus has to go, but it looks a bit like that.
Doesn't Kushner absolutely despise fatty? Can't see it happening tbh
I just don't see any other reason for Christie to visit the WH out of the blue like this.
This obviously could be wrong -
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/319207-christie-to-meet-for-lunch-in-dc-with-trump
I think they should have also released the GOP data.
If Wikileaks were given something big and refused to publish because of some agenda I think it would have found other medias by now.
Trump is apparently considering replacing Flynn with.. General Petraeus. You really couldn't make this shit up..
They are all generals or admirals.
I'm not sure what your point is.
yeah exactly
I'm pretty certain I read that WikiLeaks gotten their hands on GOP and/or 45 e-mails too. I agree with Pexbo. If they have e-mails from all parties, they should release all of them if they want to be taken seriously. Nobody can tell me that GOP and 45-e-mails do not contain compromising information.
One thing is for sure: Chaffetz won't go to heaven but burn in hell for a very long time.This same guy would have gone to any length over the emails.
They're not even subtle. They must think we are idiots.
They all come from the same background, whether its Petraeus, Harward, or Kellog.
I wish I would remember. It was either shortly before or after the election, and it wasn't an obscure website or somebody from the Dem campaign. Give me a bit of time to find out but I remember that I was appalled by WikiLeaks' partisanship when I read this.
Have they all pled guilty in federal court of leaking classified intelligence information, or is that maybe just Petraeus?
If they did, and it was apparent they weren't releasing them, wouldn't the source have released them elsewhere now? NYT and the Guardian, (and of course The Intercept) have instructions to securely leak files. (Though unlike Wikileaks all 3 will redact personal info before releasing)
Lyin' Paul ... ?
I don't know. To release something, you need to get your hands on it, no? If WikiLeaks sits on data, I guess no media can force them to release it.
Just Petreaus, but he's head and shoulders better than any of the other candidates.
I don't even have the words..
I meant, Wikileaks does not have their own hackers, they have sources. If the source wanted to release it, they would have sent it to someone else if WL was sitting on it. If the source was Russia, if the source wanted to help only Trump, they would not have hacked GOP data at all (or at least they would not have given it to WL to sit on).
He made the right decision by asking flynn
I thought Flynn was the one that handed in his resignation on his own accord.I'm sure Kim jong-un ordered the kill and he's now laughing his fat Titties off.
Probably because you know feck all about Petreaus other than what you are spoonfed in the media.
She looks like she hasn't slept for days and is spooning coffee granules straight from the jar.
She does seem broken. I can't imagine anyone with a shred of integrity being comfortable being asked to go on TV every day and lie on behalf of the President. That's obviously not what most of them signed up for when they took the job.
Admittedly I do not remember if hackers had shared GOP / 45 hacks with WikiLeaks. (I really need to retrieve that article.) However, it would have been stupid by any hackers who wanted Agent Orange to win not to hack him or the GOP. It will be quite convenient to gently encourage 'collaboration'.
Ya, my basic point is that anyone who had the files and wanted to release them could have done it, with or without WL.
- Status