1 nil to the intelligence agencies
If you had to list people you really didn't want to piss off if you were President, I should think Intelligence agencies and the media would be right up there at the top.
1 nil to the intelligence agencies
I look at her and cannot think about anything else than botox and collagen injections as well as plastic surgery. And badly colored hair as her Daddy.Cosmetic surgery can do that.
Yeah, that's exactly what I was getting at. And I agree, I hope this is just the beginning. It would be so amazing to see the press working together to take Trump and his billionaire banker mates down after all the unfair shite they have been given recently. Fake News now is it Mr Trump?
Anybody know when the next Spicey press briefing is going to be held? Shall be a popcorn worthy event.
Hopefully 45 himself and Pence.One down!
Next?
Thanks.Tomorrow (Today).
Hopefully 45 himself and Pence.
I'm actually torn on this. Nuclear Armageddon aside, incompetent buffoonery is obviously preferable to competent malice (Pence & Ryan).
I agree. When Trump was elected I wanted to see how the press reacted to it. It hasn't disappointed me so far, even though at times I wish they could've gone at him even harder. I hope this actually brings a small reform to the news industry, it is still too profit driven and click-baity (not all are of course). Through this, I imagine investigative journalism and hard fact checking journalism will come out better, and we might have a better industry at the end of it.
I was just going to say.... If it's confirmed Flynn talked to the Soviets, next obvious question is what was he talking about and was it under request from someone else.This might be bad news for Trump. If the Senate intelligence committee give Flynn immunity, he could under penalty of perjury, be called to testify about whether Trump knew anything about Russian contacts during the campaign and transition.
How bad is this for Trump in the grand scheme of things?
I don't think his supporters will care either way and will probably rebuke with the usual "FAKE NEWS" or probably attest it to some snowflake libtard conspiracy.
Immunity would suggest it's very much in his interest.Depends on if Flynn wants to snitch. If he does, it could bring the whole house down.
Immunity would suggest it's very much in his interest.
Petition rejected by May.
Immunity would suggest it's very much in his interest.
LOLEh, Trump could just pardon him.
What exactly did he do wrong? As head if NSA does he have authority to speak with Russian ambassador? If so, quite harsh that he is fired for speaking to them a few weeks early as NSA head elect?
So that means discussing tabled for 20 Feb is cancelled?She's a fecking cnut.
What exactly did he do wrong? As head if NSA does he have authority to speak with Russian ambassador? If so, quite harsh that he is fired for speaking to them a few weeks early as NSA head elect?
How bad is this for Trump in the grand scheme of things?
I don't think his supporters will care either way and will probably rebuke with the usual "FAKE NEWS" or probably attest it to some snowflake libtard conspiracy.
So that means discussing tabled for 20 Feb is cancelled?
So what would be next step of public protest for this?
Thanks for explaining. I was just getting my facts straight. Its very encouraging as it shows that FBI remains neutral as well as providing early motivating success for the investigative media.You can´t be serious ? He was in no position to talk policy or sanctions with the Russian ambassador while Obama was the president. Also Flynn had no position at that time to discuss anything with foreign officials so he had no authority to do any kind of state business (he properly broke some very serious laws regarding this). He overstepped the political red lines when he made contact to the Russian ambassador under such conditions. Also take into account what they talked about, it make it seem he is working for an opponent of the U.S.A. This is enough to get any official fired. Also the Lying part is extremely serious and it could get him prosecuted under a proper president.
Whats the point of a debate if the decision has been taken? Or is the theory that she can reverse her position if influenced by the debate?The debate will still take place.
Adding to what @Red Viking was writing: Somebody posted this WP article https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...5dab88-f228-11e6-8d72-263470bf0401_story.html in which it says:What exactly did he do wrong? As head of NSA does he have authority to speak with Russian ambassador? If so, quite harsh that he is fired for speaking to them a few weeks early as NSA head elect?
I bolded the relevant part. Flynn either consciously lied or has such a bad memory that he's a security risk.In a Feb. 8 interview with The Washington Post, Flynn categorically denied discussing sanctions with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, repeating public assertions made in January by top Trump officials. One day after the interview, Flynn revised his account, telling The Post through a spokesman that he “couldn’t be certain that the topic never came up.”
Two officials said a main topic of the relevant call was the sanctions.
A source close to the president, who was not there but had knowledge of the situation, told me that Trump was going around tables during dinner asking guests what he should do about Priebus and Spicer—a crowdsourcing game he reportedly played when he was deciding which candidate to choose for vice president, and again, when picking who he would nominate as secretary of state. (A White House spokesperson did not immediately respond to request for comment.)
Whats the point of a debate if the decision has been taken? Or is the theory that she can reverse her position if influenced by the debate?
Civic action is now very important.