The FF recognized the Electoral College as a disaster and never fixed it?
Half of the wanted a popular vote, half wanted the Congress to pick the president, and the EC was the messy compromise they settled on.
The FF recognized the Electoral College as a disaster and never fixed it?
Not my area of expertise, but my understanding is that at least Maddison, Wilson and Hamilton all fought really hard for a the equivalent of a popular vote, but settled on the electoral college as a better option than just letting Congress pick (which was the original idea, like most countries).The FF recognized the Electoral College as a disaster and never fixed it?
Initially my reaction is that the press should just keep asking <insert latest WH press secretary here> for more details on the AIDS vaccine until she gives up.How can he say with such clarity and positivity that an AIDS vaccine is available for it to be totally wrong, doesn’t anyone proof read what he says...
And so it goes on and on.....
John Bolton: Trump administration sues to block book
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-53073526
"I will consider every conversation with me as president highly classified," Mr Trump told reporters on Monday. "So that would mean that if he wrote a book and if the book gets out, he's broken the law and I would think he would have criminal problems."
Very obvious there's stuff in that book the Donald doesn't want known.And so it goes on and on.....
John Bolton: Trump administration sues to block book
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-53073526
Very obvious there's stuff in that book the Donald doesn't want known.
Probably ivankammmm.It's been reported he has staffers update and retweet for him, but I honestly think the majority is Trump, especially during the recent crisis periods.
The endorsements to GOP candidates are probably mostly staff, but you can guarantee all the ranting, name calling and self indulgent pity fueled Tweets are 100% him.
I've always thought his Twitter would be piss easy to hack. I bet his password is something like MAGA1 or IVANKA1234
A proper inside look to his presidency would be very interesting.Oh shit that hadn’t even crossed my mind
A proper inside look to his presidency would be very interesting.
A proper inside look to his presidency would be very interesting.
Bingo.Or is he really that dumb and american are just dumber
Bingo.
America is riddled with Anti-intellectualism. Stupidity has become the only language many of them understand.
Oh shit that hadn’t even crossed my mind
Just to clarify
That tweet is what I'm talking about when I say that Twitter spammers, even if they are anti Trump, are effectively helping him out. I think the first half dozen responses are just shitty anti Trump memes and you have to scroll through a lot to find someone who is actually challenging what he says with evidence. To the casual viewer it just looks like a mob who are shouting over him which plays nicely into his rhetoric that his critics are fake and over reacting.
It's the same with all of the responses to his tweets. If you didn't know that he was talking bullshit in a specific tweet you wouldn't know it judging by the responses that all reuse the same crappy "Two Hands to Drink" memes. This is the cnut responsible for stealing hundreds of billions of dollars but apparently the most pressing issue is how he walks down a ramp. I genuinely believe that some of these anti Trump responses are from his people trying to dilute the critical messaging.
I agree. Trump often seems, and has historically seemed, to be a comic character - we all laugh at his antics, his words, and I'm frequently guilty of this myself. But it doesn't actually help at all, I think; I'll try to explain my opinion:That tweet is what I'm talking about when I say that Twitter spammers, even if they are anti Trump, are effectively helping him out. I think the first half dozen responses are just shitty anti Trump memes and you have to scroll through a lot to find someone who is actually challenging what he says with evidence. To the casual viewer it just looks like a mob who are shouting over him which plays nicely into his rhetoric that his critics are fake and over reacting.
It's the same with all of the responses to his tweets. If you didn't know that he was talking bullshit in a specific tweet you wouldn't know it judging by the responses that all reuse the same crappy "Two Hands to Drink" memes. This is the cnut responsible for stealing hundreds of billions of dollars but apparently the most pressing issue is how he walks down a ramp. I genuinely believe that some of these anti Trump responses are from his people trying to dilute the critical messaging.
I respect your opinion to disagree with my opinion.While I don't disagree with this I will say that his twitter feed represents a (morbidly) fascinating microcosm of that changing of American political norms.
...but Steve is right.I agree. Trump often seems, and has historically seemed, to be a comic character - we all laugh at his antics, his words, and I'm frequently guilty of this myself. But it doesn't actually help at all, I think; I'll try to explain my opinion:
We're often told that ridicule is our best weapon against those we consider as unworthy leaders - apparently, these leaders or their credibility 'cannot survive once they are widely ridiculed' - but why is this received wisdom considered to be the absolute truth? In my view, this 'truth' is spoon-fed to us from above - it encourages us to resist the temptation to truly protest or take action against such leaders. It's an easy, lazy option and, given that the price of protest is often violence inflicted on us, an understandable first resort for those who suffer under such unmerited leadership. But it isn't effective, not when particular leaders are buttressed against removal by powerful organisations or figures.
I respect your opinion to disagree with my opinion.
...but Steve is right.
Pigeons can't see double negatives when they're simultaneously trying to stop a two year old from diving off a sofa so technically you're fifty percent to blame for my misunderstanding.But but....I agreed with you.
I am so confused.
And I don't trust Pigeons.
Pigeons can't see double negatives when they're simultaneously trying to stop a two year old from diving off a sofa so technically you're fifty percent to blame for my misunderstanding.
Every country has their share of idiots but the US tends to produce more than their fair share and a special type at that.Unfortunately that is not something that is exclusive to the USA.
We already had a good look with that Michael Wolfe book. I'm looking forward to this one, but it does piss me off that the walrus mustached psychopath Bolton wouldn't testify to congress, but will now sell his knowledge after impeachment is over. Prick of a man.
Just incredible how this political drama is supposed to be news. While we have a pandemic, protests, and people suffering in the midst of a recession.
Pigeons can't see double negatives when they're simultaneously trying to stop a two year old from diving off a sofa so technically you're fifty percent to blame for my misunderstanding.
This John Bolton book is definitely going to be the end of Trump. Like totally, there is no way he will survive this 327th attempt of someone trying to make a buck by saying, look at me I sold my soul (haha Bolton having soul) and worked with Trump and he indeed turned out to be a fecking dolt.
John Bolton can suck my balls.
That's mean, I thinkSadly, I read all your posts in my mind with Ben Shapiro's voice.