Well first, I was talking about this thread, second, I'm yet to see any stats that back you up generally. Post evidence please.
Talk about missing the point. Good grief.
The golden shower story is so absurd that it has to be either an instance of epic trolling, or true.
Nah, I think he just got a life and stopped posting as much.I swear I see far more mentions of Cina (or indeed his mum) than I do posts by him. I think we must generally frequent rather different threads.
I would say, given that, I feel I should give him the benefit of the doubt, but then, I think the few posts I've seen may have been sufficient to remove doubt.
I wasn't aware this was an option.Nah, I think he just got a life and stopped posting as much.
Why would people assume all Sanders supporters were Democrats or even leaned Democrat? Polling just before the election showed something like 72% of Sanders supported Clinton. His support base however was far broader than traditional Dem voters which is why it was such a crying shame that he lost the primary. He'd have destroyed Trump.
Which is what you are being accused of.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/senate-obamacare-repeal-233521
Enjoy
Is this a promise?Firstly, the polls were mostly wrong. The primaries showed that Far more people who had not voted in a normal Republican primary came out for Trump.
Anecdotally I know of several cases where Sanders supporters voted third party, did not vote at all or even voted for Trump. Sure many also voted for Hillary. This has been discussed before so I wont go into it again. Trumps victory was a fluke in many ways. He carried key mid west states. Hillary ran up the vote in the West.
Hilarious and definately could be true. I watched the John McAfee doc last week and thought to myself that this guy is similar in some ways to Trump. They spoke to a couple of his live in local girlfriends and they said they never had vaginal sex, instead he would cut a hole in a hammock and make them crap in his mouth. His toxoplasmosis levels must be through the roof, same with trump from rolling in the amber nectar.The golden shower story is so absurd that it has to be either an instance of epic trolling, or true.
No they weren't. They were within the margin of error for the EC and predicted the popular vote to a good standard. For them to be mostly wrong would rely on them to be outside the margin of error, if you're expecting a poll to be 100% accurate then that's on you.Firstly, the polls were mostly wrong.
@Red Dreams Are you angling for Kellyanne's job? Because you were talking about the thread, Ubik answered about the thread, and then you flipped it towards the election... you're doing a good job, just not sure Kellyanne will let it go so easily.
Why don't you tell me what's going on in Syria, and why are we (US/West) there?
The number of posts in favour of Bernie was similar to the ratio of support Hilary got in the election.@Red Dreams
"Congrats for missing the point."
What is the point?
You were to the left of Hillary, when Bernie lost you decided that policies matter less than corruption and opposed her on that basis, but are now celebrating the "anti-establishment" Trump who is corrupt, and openly so? What is the point, indeed.
@Ubik
Among the addicted early posters in that thread, it was InfiniteBoredom and you for HRC vs Red Dreams, langster and me (Bernie) among the regular posters, with Raoul flitting from Bernie to Rubio and back before settling on Clinton. It wasn't a "collective orgasm", it was probably 2:1 (2/3rd pro Bernie).
If it has been invented, kudos to the person who did it. It fits so perfectly with Drumpf's image. I'm confident that if it exists, we'll learn what kind of sex the second tape covers (audio only, if what Paul Wood was told is correct). Time will tell if what I expect comes up.The golden shower story is so absurd that it has to be either an instance of epic trolling, or true.
The number of posts in favour of Bernie was similar to the ratio of support Hilary got in the election.
Possibly, and mine might be spending months going back and forth with @langster taking the piss out the Republicans and and drooling over Bernie, but there were definitely a lot more of us firmly in the "Bernie gets it" train.Maybe my perception is skewed by me perennially replying to ubik/Infi, but what I remember form the thread was argument (about policies and then about polls and then about Clintons' 1990s history) not consensus.
@Red Dreams
"Congrats for missing the point."
What is the point?
You were to the left of Hillary, when Bernie lost you decided that policies matter less than corruption and opposed her on that basis, but are now celebrating the "anti-establishment" Trump who is corrupt, and openly so? What is the point, indeed.
@Ubik
Among the addicted early posters in that thread, it was InfiniteBoredom and you for HRC vs Red Dreams, langster and me (Bernie) among the regular posters, with Raoul flitting from Bernie to Rubio and back before settling on Clinton. It wasn't a "collective orgasm", it was probably 2:1 (2/3rd pro Bernie).
I'm not pushing a conspiracy theory of cloak, daggers, secret hand shakes and symbols but I do think it's clear the far-right of many western countries are combining resources to come to power for the benefit of shared agendas.
This thread/forum is unimportant.
I was addressing the fact most Sanders supporters did not listen to him and vote for Hillary.
@Red Dreams
"Congrats for missing the point."
What is the point?
You were to the left of Hillary, when Bernie lost you decided that policies matter less than corruption and opposed her on that basis, but are now celebrating the "anti-establishment" Trump who is corrupt, and openly so? What is the point, indeed.
@Ubik
Among the addicted early posters in that thread, it was InfiniteBoredom and you for HRC vs Red Dreams, langster and me (Bernie) among the regular posters, with Raoul flitting from Bernie to Rubio and back before settling on Clinton. It wasn't a "collective orgasm", it was probably 2:1 (2/3rd pro Bernie).
HRC (until she adopted Bernie's policies) and Rubio would have been best for his 401K, but he saw that Bernie's could be a strong Dem candidate.Raoul was Rubio?!
That is all cost control. This has been trending this way since 1999 and I'm sure before. ACA didn't cause it nor did it prevent it. The major differences are:Specialists now need to be approved (which they never gave me problems anyway), prescriptions went up from $5 to $20 so between me, wife and kids we are talking about over $200 a month, now I have to pay a co-payment for specialists and hospital visit, so not too bad yet besides the premium going up every year and the prescriptions went up 4 times the rest is about the same.
I'd say @Nikhil was strongly for Sanders as well
If it has been invented, kudos to the person who did it. It fits so perfectly with Drumpf's image.
I could have went my whole life happily without knowing that.Hilarious and definately could be true. I watched the John McAfee doc last week and thought to myself that this guy is similar in some ways to Trump. They spoke to a couple of his live in local girlfriends and they said they never had vaginal sex, instead he would cut a hole in a hammock and make them crap in his mouth. His toxoplasmosis levels must be through the roof, same with trump from rolling in the amber nectar.
I could have went my whole life happily without knowing that.
I got that but nevertheless I think that if 10 people were given the task to invent a juicy story with compromising material on him, only one would have come up with Golden Showers.Don't know about those kudos man, if anything it looks like an obvious parody/troll attempt on watergate (with 'watersports' being slang for golden showers and stuff). Which obviously doesn't have to mean there's no compromising material on Trump, and I do agree that Trump's image is so ridiculous you can't put anything beyond him, but that's more because of himself than because of the brilliance of the story.
I'd say @Nikhil was strongly for Sanders as well
Check post counts (RD and I slowed down or stopped by September)