Henrik Larsson
Still logged in at RAWK (help!)
We'll ask the questions, here.
Now, where did you hide the gold?
Sorry officer. Spent it all on hookers and blow, back in the 70's.
Last edited:
We'll ask the questions, here.
Now, where did you hide the gold?
Has something new happened this morning ?
And the former MI6 agent is not the only source for the claim about Russian kompromat on the president-elect. Back in August, a retired spy told me he had been informed of its existence by "the head of an East European intelligence agency".
Later, I used an intermediary to pass some questions to active duty CIA officers dealing with the case file - they would not speak to me directly. I got a message back that there was "more than one tape", "audio and video", on "more than one date", in "more than one place" - in the Ritz-Carlton in Moscow and also in St Petersburg - and that the material was "of a sexual nature".
The claims of Russian kompromat on Mr Trump were "credible", the CIA believed.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-38589427Last April, the CIA director was shown intelligence that worried him. It was - allegedly - a tape recording of a conversation about money from the Kremlin going into the US presidential campaign.
I just saw the Rubio link you'd posted where he goes apeshit on Aleppo, conclude Putin is a war criminal, so thought I'd if the same can apply to W.
Look how quickly this story is developing. Clear now there are separate sources claiming the Russians are in possession of multiple videos.
Think its just a matter of time before the smoking gun footage is leaked.
Well it's a very complex and difficult subject, and military operations are hardly my area of expertise. But would it be fair to say the structure of the Russian army and the influence of Putin works very differently to the way it works in the United States?
Massively different in the sense that there are nowhere near as many checks and balances in place against Putin.Well it's a very complex and difficult subject, and military operations are hardly my area of expertise. But would it be fair to say the structure of the Russian army and the influence and involvement of Putin works very differently to the way it works in the United States, or worked when W. Bush was Commander-in-chief?
If indeed, the Russians do have it, they will never release it. Why would they want to compromise their golden goose?Look how quickly this story is developing. Clear now there are separate sources claiming the Russians are in possession of multiple videos.
Think its just a matter of time before the smoking gun footage is leaked.
But do you think the Western media is full of shit when they talk about Syria and Aleppo and the real reasons we're there?
It's not a conspiracy theory, it's simply the truth. And it's a fecking worrisome development.It's funny that the Illuminati has always been a running joke and something credited to the minds usually protected by tin foil but I really don't think the idea of a group of people that have come together to forge a "new world order" is completely far fetched any more.
It really does look like Putin is forming/has formed a group of influential politicians (or at least is backing them all separately) to try and change up the shape of global politics. You've got Putin, Trump, Farage, Le Pen, Wilders, Petry... I'm sure there's more.
I'm not pushing a conspiracy theory of cloak, daggers, secret hand shakes and symbols but I do think it's clear the far-right of many western countries are combining resources to come to power for the benefit of shared agendas.
Smoking gun? Kinky.Look how quickly this story is developing. Clear now there are separate sources claiming the Russians are in possession of multiple videos.
Think its just a matter of time before the smoking gun footage is leaked.
You mean like the Republicans did with Obama when they had the chance. And still do after he is gone
On the contrary, it's time for me to put my head into my arse further. I have a reasonable job, insurance provided by employer and I'm in the bracket of household income in the 75K to 125K per year. I'm hoping that my wife will get a job this year. I'm also a Lutheran Christian and a republican government is not going to hurt me personally. I may end up paying lesser taxes and I will tell myself that this is the working of God himself. If hardcore lefties can enjoy a Trump government for the perverse reason that Sanders didn't get selected, I think it is time for my head and arse to be reacquainted.
My response was as ridiculous as your post.
Wrong. You should know that it started out very pro-Sanders, given you were participating in it then. When he failed to be nominated, the vast majority of the Sanders supporters saw Trump as far the bigger threat and backed Clinton with reservations. Because they're sensible.My response was as ridiculous as your post.
Hate Trump all you like. But don't put words into my mouth. Certainly not attribute assumptions that I have never subscribed to.
Btw this thread has evolved from the Hillary cheerleading thread to the Hate Trump thread with the same participants, excepting one or two who want to wait and see.
Trump is now using his twitter to advertise for L.L Bean. Crazy. Would link but can't right now.
This will probably be easier if you just say what you think about the 'Western' media and the real reasons 'we' are there.
The collective orgasm every time he opened his mouth during the primary is a fairly good giveaway.Wrong. You should know that it started out very pro-Sanders, given you were participating in it then. When he failed to be nominated, the vast majority of the Sanders supporters saw Trump as far the bigger threat and backed Clinton with reservations. Because they're sensible.
Wrong. You should know that it started out very pro-Sanders, given you were participating in it then. When he failed to be nominated, the vast majority of the Sanders supporters saw Trump as far the bigger threat and backed Clinton with reservations. Because they're sensible.
Wrong. You should know that it started out very pro-Sanders, given you were participating in it then. When he failed to be nominated, the vast majority of the Sanders supporters saw Trump as far the bigger threat and backed Clinton with reservations. Because they're sensible.
Specialists now need to be approved (which they never gave me problems anyway), prescriptions went up from $5 to $20 so between me, wife and kids we are talking about over $200 a month, now I have to pay a co-payment for specialists and hospital visit, so not too bad yet besides the premium going up every year and the prescriptions went up 4 times the rest is about the same.What part of the plan coverage got worse?
I like the idea but, sadly, people other than regular posters to Redcafe's CE had a say in who the next President would be.This is essentially an untrue statement of fact. If it had been true, Hillary would be President.
This is essentially an untrue statement of fact. If it had been true, Hillary would be President.
My response was as ridiculous as your post.
Hate Trump all you like. But don't put words into my mouth. Certainly not attribute assumptions that I have never subscribed to.
Btw this thread has evolved from the Hillary cheerleading thread to the Hate Trump thread with the same participants, excepting one or two who want to wait and see.
Not really. Most active Sanders supporters did realise Hilary was the more sensible choice compared to Trump once Bernie was out the race, at least to some extent. Definitely in this thread anyway, and probably in the general public.
I bet the others would point out that Sanders was the choice of this thread. Once Clinton was nominated, naturally the Dems candidate had the support in this thread and elsewhere. Sanders himself campaigned for Clinton. There's just one in this thread who keeps mentioning Clinton when Trump is criticized and that's you. I'll post whatever I like. If you don't like it, put me on ignore and move on. Cheers.
This is essentially an untrue statement of fact. If it had been true, Hillary would be President.
Hence Ubik's implication about you not being sensible.This thread/forum is unimportant.
I was addressing the fact most Sanders supporters did not listen to him and vote for Hillary.
Well first, I was talking about this thread, second, I'm yet to see any stats that back you up generally. Post evidence please.This is essentially an untrue statement of fact. If it had been true, Hillary would be President.
I swear I see far more mentions of Cina (or indeed his mum) than I do posts by him. I think we must generally frequent rather different threads.One the other hand, if votes were based on how many likes a redcafe poster had @Cina would basically make himself king, and who wants that?