Should be $35B
He'll probably buy the aggregate from Mexico and employ Mexicans to build it.
Should be $35B
Yeah, it's pure populism.Conservatives proclaim themselves as pro-austerity, balance the budget types. A wall would cost something like $35b to build, which doesn't jive with the conservative agenda to tax less and spend less.
Should be $35B
That is still peanuts.
Indeed. Sounds like a massive, expensive, government financed building project.Yep. Not very conservative is it.
Our country is regressing to Ancient China levels of national accomplishment$35b is almost double the NASA budget
“Right now, we have bigger problems—you understand that?” Trump told a 10-year-old boy at a campaign event in New Hampshire last November, when the child asked about NASA. “We’ve got to fix our potholes. You know, we don’t exactly have a lot of money.”Is trump in favor of NASA or he's against? - raising the budget or cut
“Right now, we have bigger problems—you understand that?” Trump told a 10-year-old boy at a campaign event in New Hampshire last November, when the child asked about NASA. “We’ve got to fix our potholes. You know, we don’t exactly have a lot of money.”
Oh the ironyMaybe trump should cough up the millions he has avoided paying in his taxes over the decades. That would go some way to pay for some of those potholes.
There you have it:
Read the full report here: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3254242/ICA-2017-01.pdf
Conservatives proclaim themselves as pro-austerity, balance the budget types. A wall would cost something like $35b to build, which doesn't jive with the conservative agenda to tax less and spend less.
Meh. It's not exactly a revelation and it didn't affect the election anyway.
There you have it:
Read the full report here: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3254242/ICA-2017-01.pdf
A wall is a damn sight cheaper than the nukes he keeps crapping on about. I think it makes a lot more sense to judge his politics by how he chooses to spend federal money than the fact he chooses to spend it at all.
What he meant to say: Russia, if you are listening, please hack NBC and let me know how they got the Intel.
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump
I am asking the chairs of the House and Senate committees to investigate top secret intelligence shared with NBC prior to me seeing it.4:51 pm · 6 Jan 2017
This isn't going to end well
The actual reports states it didn't effect the presidency if I'm not mistaken.It most certainly did. Without the leaked emails and overwheming torrent of fake news, Clinton would have romped to victory.
There's abosolutely no question that they successfully damaged confidence in her tipping undecideds towards Trump, protest votes or abstaining.
The actual reports states it didn't effect the presidency if I'm not mistaken.
Come on that's a bit much. Clinton did in the end romp home with the popular vote, she lost the election for the same reason the Remain side lost in the referendum and why almost every social democratic party in the Western world has lost giant percentages of it's vote - globalisation and the move from Labour capital to Financial capital. It has very little to do with John Podesta emails and ''fake'' news.It most certainly did. Without the leaked emails and overwheming torrent of fake news, Clinton would have romped to victory.
There's abosolutely no question that they successfully damaged confidence in her tipping undecideds towards Trump, protest votes or abstaining.
Apparently, for expediency sake, America will pay for it now and Mexico will repay America later
I'm pretty sure his supporters are going to come around to the fact that America will pay for it to keep out the immigrants.
She was constantly on the defensive and her team was unable to get her policy front and center to the lazy electorate.Come on that's a bit much. Clinton did in the end romp home with the popular vote, she lost the election for the same reason the Remain side lost in the referendum and why almost every social democratic party in the Western world has lost giant percentages of it's vote - globalisation and the move from Labour capital to Financial capital. It has very little to do with John Podesta emails and ''fake'' news.
Don't forget to get a chunk of the wall and mount it in your mantle as a memory of those bad times. I swear we've been here before with a wall...I hope I can be there in 2046 when the wall is brought down and the segregation and oppression comes to an end.
Somewhere at home I have a piece of painted concrete that's reportedly from the Berlin wall, bought on my trip there in 1990.Don't forget to get a chunk of the wall and mount it in your mantle as a memory of those bad times. I swear we've been here before with a wall...
Can't remember if it was Laura Ingraham or Ann Coulter that posted a picture of the Berlin Wall saying "proof that walls work"Don't forget to get a chunk of the wall and mount it in your mantle as a memory of those bad times. I swear we've been here before with a wall...
Meh. It's not exactly a revelation and it didn't affect the election anyway.
Somewhere at home I have a piece of painted concrete that's reportedly from the Berlin wall, bought on my trip there in 1990.
The actual reports states it didn't effect the presidency if I'm not mistaken.
You either beleive the report or you don't. The report states it didn't effect the result.Of course it affected the election. Trump won three states by a total of 71k votes out of at a total 128million votes.
Err.. if true that's 0.x% of what the wall would cost.For his supporters that's just details. If a wall gets built, no matter who pays for it, it'll be considered as him keeping his promise.
Plus, all the US has to do is pay for it and then withhold that amount of the aid that it normally gives to Mexico. A source I was reading earlier said that the U.S. Government gave a total of $209 million to Mexico in 2012.
You either beleive the report or you don't. The report states it didn't effect the result.
She and her team had tons and tons of money and chose to turned it into(Oddly enough)a reality contest between two personalities. Just take her slogan - I'm With Her, she actively avoided policy. And while we can blame the electorate all we want, barring an Obama like figure these political parties has seen a voter drop off and have not only taken this for granted but have been quite happy to do nothing about it, it's simple sheer incompetence and arrogance to lose the vote by this tiny margin.She was constantly on the defensive and her team was unable to get her policy front and center to the lazy electorate.
It doesn't take much to swing:
Wisconsin ~20,000 of ~3,000,000
PA ~ 40,000 of ~6,000,000
Michigan ~ 10,000 of ~5,000,000
So flip 10,000 in Wisconsin from Trump to Clinton and she wins that state etc. Or, get 20,000 more dems out to vote. Or a combination. Insanely tight margins.
Drumpf getting seriously trolled by President Fox.
You either beleive the report or you don't. The report states it didn't effect the result.
What type of guy was he for Mexico? I literally know nothing about him, so he might as well be another hypocrite crook, but it's impossible not to enjoy those tweets
Leaving that aside, surely the bigger problem is that we have the president of Russia, directly trying to influence the democratic process of the United States of America, while the new president of the USA has been openly supporting him. That's just surreal in my book.