snopes
They dismiss demonstrable fact, so it doesn’t surprise me.Problem with snopes is that right-wing nutters instantly dismiss for a variety of comical reasons, reasons they believe are true.
Christ, Mattis is actually decent, not that it’s saying much vs. the other cabinet members.
He is one of the better ones although its hard to expect any cabinet member to stick around more than a year or two with Trump. He gets tired of them or vice versa, or they refuse to enact some idiotic policy of his (such as Shulkin and VA privatization). I can't imagine any of his original cabinet members actually sticking around for the entire 4 years.
What a cnut.
Clown
They must be thinking why just not make it official?U.S. Plans to Withdraw From UN Human Rights Council Today!
And they’re justifying it by saying that the UNHRC is “too political”.They must be thinking why just not make it official?
I wonder how exclusive the non membership club is...And they’re justifying it by saying that the UNHRC is “too political”.
i did
Long and short congress needs to give funds and more judges to the crisis on the border and pass new laws to dictate what needs to be done. Trump has chosen to use the kids as polictical pawns to get congress to act. Its shitty in humane , but its what hes chosen so the Republicans need to actually take a look at the bill in the senate or introduce one in the house so this madness stops.
I doubt he means anything close to that.
I did read your post and what you are saying is correct. This issue more complex than what many on here are making it to be. I can't stand the face of Trump and half of the people who thinks he is some badass that "says it how it is" but I am starting to understand why some people dislike the left.
This situation is a mess and needs to be sorted. Do remember if I commit a crime in the U.S my children will have no one to go to either (from what I know)
Also want to point out I do not have all the information and I am just going by the limited stuff I have read so maybe I am missing something big here but I am trying my best to understand the situation than just scooping up what sells papers. If I am wrong don't attack me and guide me to the right source
Arguing on the legal side (which I think is the weakest one), appearing at the border and requesting asylum isn't a crime.
Until the asylum is being processed what should they do? (they illegally cross the border for that don't they?)
Again, it is not a crime to request asylum. They are refusing to hear the asylum request (which is against the law itself) and charging them with a misdemeanour. A misdemeanour puts this in the same class as public intoxication. They are then separating the children from the parents and locking them in different cages with no contact for this misdemeanor.
If you want the legal argument, I'm sure the ACLU has one.
I don't care I think the moral argument is the only relevant one here. If this was required by law, then the law is bad.
If they cross illegally to claim asylum (which the vast majority of the worlds asylum seekers do) then they should be put in camps/accommodation where the family unit can be together. Once all details have been verified the asylum seekers can either be allowed to stay or get deported back to the last port of entry.Until the asylum is being processed what should they do? (they illegally cross the border for that don't they?)
If they cross illegally to claim asylum (which the vast majority of the worlds asylum seekers do) then they should be put in camps/accommodation where the family unit can be together. Once all details have been verified the asylum seekers can either be allowed to stay or get deported back to the last port of entry.
If I was a child again I can assure you that I would rather sleep on a rat infested pile of shit with my parents by my side than stay in a cushy room away from them while not knowing if they are alive or dead.
as has been mentioned many times on here before, you can't send kids to prison to doesn't matter what you want -- that would be a bigger mess than what it is right now.
Your solution of providing every illegal immigrant accommodation until their asylums gets processed does not seem practical to me. Again I don't think this child separating thing is good. There has to be a better way but it's definitely not as simple as you people are making it out to be.
Liberal **** snowflakesWhat do you mean, "you people"?
as has been mentioned many times on here before, you can't send kids to prison to doesn't matter what you want -- that would be a bigger mess than what it is right now.
Your solution of providing every illegal immigrant accommodation until their asylums gets processed does not seem practical to me. Again I don't think this child separating thing is good. There has to be a better way but it's definitely not as simple as you people are making it out to be.
What do you mean, "you people"?
it takes less effort to keep the families together than it does to separate them, how fecking dare you defend this with bullshit logistical concerns pulled out of your arseholeas has been mentioned many times on here before, you can't send kids to prison to doesn't matter what you want -- that would be a bigger mess than what it is right now.
Your solution of providing every illegal immigrant accommodation until their asylums gets processed does not seem practical to me. Again I don't think this child separating thing is good. There has to be a better way but it's definitely not as simple as you people are making it out to be.
as has been mentioned many times on here before, you can't send kids to prison to doesn't matter what you want -- that would be a bigger mess than what it is right now.
Your solution of providing every illegal immigrant accommodation until their asylums gets processed does not seem practical to me. Again I don't think this child separating thing is good. There has to be a better way but it's definitely not as simple as you people are making it out to be.