Bwaahahah
Wonder if he'll resign to go and help Parscale with the reelection campaign.
Damage has already been done with Kushner anyway. Didn't he reportedly have the most requests for intel from all non-NSC staff?
You mean they're gonna become Democrats again?Best case scenario is this will be the beginning of the end for Kushner and Ivanka in the WH. Hopefully they will feck back off to being NY socialites.
I'll take a bet that trump just hands him the intel he wants and nothing will change.
Find it interesting that he connects with people at all. Watched some his speeches during his campaign and they are full of hate, racism and fear. Don't believe you have to be well educated to see through all of his incoherent lies. I had a friend visit from the US a little while before the election and he was going to vote for Trump mostly because of his dislike for Hillary. During our discussion I called Trump a clown and he responded "Yes he is but he'll be our clown".
Sorry but that joke went over my head. Hurr hurr
It's like a Spike Milligan sketch.
What a cnut. Yet again a man deciding what women do with their bodies and yet again more policy that will send the USA back to the stone age. Should be so proud.
Meanwhile, on Trump Hairways:
Here is a simpler one:I read a fantastic argument in a paper/magazine a few years back that I have never managed to find online. It was by an academic from what I recall and I can’t remember the full details, nor will I be able to articulate it as well as they did but they basically blew the idea that early term abortions are inhumane or ungodly out the window.
The gist of the argument was along the lines of:
“As a scientist, I could take an embryo and split it into two, creating twins. Does that make me a god? I could then terminate the growth of one, does that make me a murderer? Nothing has changed, surely? There was one “natural” embryo and there is still one. Would it matter which one I terminated? Could you differentiate between the “original” and the embryo that was spawned off it? How about, instead of terminating the embryo, I fuse them back together? So, first there was one potential life, then there was two and now there is only one again, is that murder? When did the soul leave one of embryos as they fused back into one? A more pertinent question is when was the soul created when I split the embryo in two? Did I create a soul? Or perhaps it’s just ridiculous idea to consider a cluster of cells as anything other than a cluster of cells.”
“Whenever abortion comes up, I have a question I've been asking for ten years now of the 'Life begins at Conception' crowd. In ten years, no one has EVER answered it honestly,” Tomlinson tweeted.
He goes on to explain a scenario whereby you are in a fertility clinic when the fire alarm goes off. Before you escape, you have the option to save either a five-year-old child who is pleading for help, or a container of 1000 viable human embryos.
“Do you A) save the child, or B) save the thousand embryos?“ he asks.
“There is no 'C.' 'C' means you all die.”
That poor, poor child.
Doesn't have a hope in hell of ever turning out half decent.
Don't feel too bad for him. Being a rich twat is not a bad alternative.
I suppose so but he doesn't ever have a hope of actually being happy.
Don't feel too bad for him. Being a rich twat is not a bad alternative.
Off-topic -
The slow, mostly audio, style may not be to everyone's taste, but I thought this was a brilliant takedown of Zimmerman's defence:
This guy, Shaun, has some amazing breakdowns on various issues. He did a fantastic job on the Martin/Zimmerman case.
His bits titled 'Outrage News' and 'Quebec Mosque Shooting: Manufacturing a Conspiracy' are brilliant take downs of the fake news machine and racism/stereotyping.
This guy, Shaun, has some amazing breakdowns on various issues. He did a fantastic job on the Martin/Zimmerman case.
His bits titled 'Outrage News' and 'Quebec Mosque Shooting: Manufacturing a Conspiracy' are brilliant take downs of the fake news machine and racism/stereotyping.
What a cnut. Yet again a man deciding what women do with their bodies and yet again more policy that will send the USA back to the stone age. Should be so proud.
Thing is it'd basically be from a SCOTUS decision.As regressive as it'd be I'd like to see what'd happen if they actually did try to touch abortion. I reckon you'd see some absolutely massive protests on a scale yet unseen which would put a lot of pressure on the government and help reduce their popularity significantly. I don't think they'd have a chance of actually getting it through without the backlash against them being extremely damaging.
As regressive as it'd be I'd like to see what'd happen if they actually did try to touch abortion. I reckon you'd see some absolutely massive protests on a scale yet unseen which would put a lot of pressure on the government and help reduce their popularity significantly. I don't think they'd have a chance of actually getting it through without the backlash against them being extremely damaging.
Thing is it'd basically be from a SCOTUS decision.
They're so worried about abortion but once that child is born they are absolutely against any benefits that would help raise it.
They're so worried about abortion but once that child is born they are absolutely against any benefits that would help raise it.
What a cnut. Yet again a man deciding what women do with their bodies and yet again more policy that will send the USA back to the stone age. Should be so proud.
Yes. That will have to abruptly end now.
I cant see it -- Trump likes to have his family involved in whatever he does. I dont think Trump wants to feel like a little fat island on his own in the WH or DC.