Dr. Dwayne
Self proclaimed tagline king.
Can someone link me to any good articles on the impact of C19 on Financial Services please?
I don't have any articles but what are you thinking of here?
Can someone link me to any good articles on the impact of C19 on Financial Services please?
If they do generate this data, it would be interesting (also expensive) to do some DNA sequencing of these people and see if there are any differences between those who are symptomatic and asymptomatic. This sequencing will only make sense if the original antibody test is done as widely as possible, because the sequencing doesn't generate very strong results usually.
Basically are Freddos going up in price again?I don't have any articles but what are you thinking of here?
I presume this is normal method of police enforcement?
Basically are Freddos going up in price again?
This is where I draw the line.Probably, yes.
Its not like the govt is going to accept that the lockdown hasn't worked. People have to die in large numbers (in Indian terms) for govt to accept anything. A few 100s dying randomly is just going to be brushed under the carpet.India has done only about 35000 tests. If the lockdown isn't working, we're truly fecked.
...<testing>
The report was from France itself to by fair and was very critical of Macron, the figures and the French response. It will likely be on BBC if you want to check it out.
It's going to be a long year and one to remember for sure. Hopefully we never go through this again and those not born yet will not be able to get their heads around it.Our prime minister has basically said he doesn't expect lockdown to be loosened at least before Autumn and likely not in 2020 at all. If anything they'll bring stricter measures for Summer (apparently only allowing people for occasional visits to do shopping and walk the dog a few times a day).
I don't really know how Europe will pull through this.
All this could have been avoided if flights from China were banned when the virus started spreading there but Europe & US were too concerned about economic impact. It wouldn't have been 10% of what it will be now, and you can be sure China will not be allowing any Americans or Europeans without quarantine for a long while.It's going to be a long year and one to remember for sure. Hopefully we never go through this again and those not born yet will not be able to get their heads around it.
After all, it's not like Europe's leaders have a centuries-long history of viral diseases to learn from, in order to prepare & protect the public against them...I don't really know how Europe will pull through this.
After all, it's not like Europe's leaders have a centuries-long history of viral diseases to learn from, in order to prepare & protect the public against them...
All this could have been avoided if flights from China were banned when the virus started spreading there but Europe & US were too concerned about economic impact. It wouldn't have been 10% of what it will be now, and you can be sure China will not be allowing any Americans or Europeans without quarantine for a long while.
Our prime minister has basically said he doesn't expect lockdown to be loosened at least before Autumn and likely not in 2020 at all. If anything they'll bring stricter measures for Summer (apparently only allowing people for occasional visits to do shopping and walk the dog a few times a day).
I don't really know how Europe will pull through this.
In the UK, local authorities tend to run out of grit for the roads...every single year, as if Winter is a shocking and new development. As with this particular crisis, the answer seems to be: they're reluctant to spend money.I don't really think anyone has any idea what they are doing right now, to be fair.
We've been through far, far worse than this. It's going to a difficult year and there is still a long way to go, but we will come out of it. In 10 years we will look back and remember this time but we won't still be rebuilding from it.
What you are suggesting would have changed nothing for Europe and the US, I don't really get why people keep making that point when it's incredibly weak. Banning flights from China alone would have made next to no difference, you would need to ban flights from everywhere because flights from China go everywhere and they also use the same airports that other destination will use. The only thing that could have prevented it was for China to close it's own borders and let no one leave.
All this could have been avoided if flights from China were banned when the virus started spreading there but Europe & US were too concerned about economic impact. It wouldn't have been 10% of what it will be now, and you can be sure China will not be allowing any Americans or Europeans without quarantine for a long while.
We are still dealing with the repercussions of the 2008 financial crisis. Difficult to see how we're going to have recovered from a bigger recession in less time.
https://www.politico.com/states/new...ral-aid-in-favor-of-medicaid-redesign-1269446Despite a $6 billion budget gap and new revenue losses posed by New York’s coronavirus outbreak, Gov. Andrew Cuomo is threatening to forgo more than $6 billion in federal aid he says would force him to adjust his Medicaid redesign strategy.
The governor this week reiterated that he will not accept the $6.7 billion in enhanced federal Medicaid matching rate (FMAP) funds approved earlier this month because it would prevent him from modifying the state’s Medicaid program as proposed in his executive budget.
Yes. According to the % you came up with!
(near enough, anyway)
India has done only about 35000 tests. If the lockdown isn't working, we're truly fecked.
China will be interesting, as to how they will keep the infections from flaring up again until the vaccine comes along.
All this could have been avoided if flights from China were banned when the virus started spreading there but Europe & US were too concerned about economic impact. It wouldn't have been 10% of what it will be now, and you can be sure China will not be allowing any Americans or Europeans without quarantine for a long while.
There have undoubtly been costly mistakes by governments around the globe. Johnson and Co. sitting on their thumbs while the virus was already running rampant in Italy and Spain or the Buffon in the White House first massively downplaying the danger and then flip flopping between war rhetoric and stumbling over his own words every sentence being two prime examples, but to think that the whole thing could have been largely prevented is just unrealistic.
What you are suggesting would have changed nothing for Europe and the US, I don't really get why people keep making that point when it's incredibly weak. Banning flights from China alone would have made next to no difference, you would need to ban flights from everywhere because flights/ships from China go everywhere and they also use the same airports that other destinations will use. The only thing that could have prevented it was for China to close it's own borders and let no one leave.
That is probably right. Without knowing current outcome which is bound to get much worse it would have been hard to justify it.I personally find statements with such hindsight always problematic. Even if they would have banned flights, what about travel by land or sea? What about the huge amounts of goods that arrived daily in the European ports until just recently? Anyone who thinks that cutting off China from the entire rest of the world and all of its lasting (especially economic) consequenses before the virus arrived in Europe of the US would not have been met with immense outrage by the people and corperations is kidding themselves. There are still people who are too stupid to follow simple guide lines with Corvid killing thousands of people on the European mainland. Measurements as drastic as this without the understanding of the gravity of the situation in the population have little to no chance to succeed.
There have undoubtly been costly mistakes by governments around the globe. Johnson and Co. sitting on their thumbs while the virus was already running rampant in Italy and Spain or the Buffon in the White House first massively downplaying the danger and then flip flopping between war rhetoric and stumbling over his own words every sentence being two prime examples, but to think that the whole thing could have been largely prevented is just unrealistic.
Even then it’s doubtful it would have worked considering so many infections are asymptomatic and it’s therefore likely there were thousands of carriers around the world before the virus was identified.
I'm not sure what it's like now but historically China has always strictly limited the movement of people within its own borders. If they still maintain some level of control over that it may limit the spread of the disease within the country.
Lombardy just posted the lowest number of new cases since 13th March. There is light at the end of the tunnel.
The president of the German Medical Association expects first schools to reopen in May while those in Corona hotspots will have to remain closed much longer. More interstingly, he claims that by Easter, Germany will have enough capacity to treat 5.6 million infected patients.
Edit: Seems he now longer holds that position. He is the chairman of the World Medical Association now.