VorZakone
What would Kenny G do?
- Joined
- May 9, 2013
- Messages
- 36,370
To be fair, they did say they'll remain flexible and won't hesitate to use more extreme measures if the situation escalates.Then they’re also a bit dumb.
To be fair, they did say they'll remain flexible and won't hesitate to use more extreme measures if the situation escalates.Then they’re also a bit dumb.
Listen. My friends and I live in an affluent and like minded area and we are doing everything we can to reduce the risk to others. Swapping spit, licking railings, lobbing phlegm into jars and pouring it into our 10 pint punch bowl at our daily coughing parties. My friends are an astronaut, a Geth Prime, Santa Claus and a sentient pair of loafers. I head a team of four hundred tadpoles who sell knock off Adibas tracksuits.
Until Boris tells us what to do again we'll continue to think for ourselves.
Boris Johnston - ''feck Business''So the Government has asked people not to go to pubs, cinemas, theatres etc but not asked them to close so these businesses cannot claim on the insurance and therefore will struggle.
Yet when I feed a whole packet of animals bars to the pet dog, suddenly I'm was the bad guy.
Life isn't as easy as you think.
Listen. My friends and I live in an affluent and like minded area and we are doing everything we can to reduce the risk to others. Swapping spit, licking railings, lobbing phlegm into jars and pouring it into our 10 pint punch bowl at our daily coughing parties. My friends are an astronaut, a Geth Prime, Santa Claus and a sentient pair of loafers. I head a team of four hundred tadpoles who sell knock off Adibas tracksuits.
Until Boris tells us what to do again we'll continue to think for ourselves.
Listen. My friends and I live in an affluent and like minded area and we are doing everything we can to reduce the risk to others. Swapping spit, licking railings, lobbing phlegm into jars and pouring it into our 10 pint punch bowl at our daily coughing parties. My friends are an astronaut, a Geth Prime, Santa Claus and a sentient pair of loafers. I head a team of four hundred tadpoles who sell knock off Adibas tracksuits.
Until Boris tells us what to do again we'll continue to think for ourselves.
Reducing the number of deaths and childhood diseases (via vaccines etc) and improving the quality of life reduces the number of children people have. Where there's war, famine/poverty, malnourishment, people strive to have as many kids as possible because many of them could die and they could easily be left with none.‘The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care & reproductive health services, we could LOWER that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.
Just seen someone posting a picture of someone selling baby milk formula on Facebook for £40, they had 35 of them left as well.The same thing with Muppets buying baby wipes because there's no toilet paper. The clue is in the fecking name you dipshits. Enjoy clogging your drains up as well.
That's definitely not the the position from which I've been arguing.Is that what it actually says though? I must be misreading it because they can't actually have fecked up that badly.
@Dante has been defending the government's position a bit, what do you make of it?
Leaked Footage Of Cobra Meeting Between Boris Johnston And Government Scientists
But...the Dutch are following a somewhat similar strategy though.
I'm still quite stunned by this.
It's one thing to feck up your predictions. That can happen, even if it's to horrendous effect in this case.
But to wilfully deviate from what other countries are doing and the WHO are imploring, only to so quickly (but not quickly enough) realise it was a horrendous mistake?
The sheer fecking arrogance of thinking they knew better than everyone else. Jesus.
Listen. My friends and I live in an affluent and like minded area and we are doing everything we can to reduce the risk to others. Swapping spit, licking railings, lobbing phlegm into jars and pouring it into our 10 pint punch bowl at our daily coughing parties. My friends are an astronaut, a Geth Prime, Santa Claus and a sentient pair of loafers. I head a team of four hundred tadpoles who sell knock off Adibas tracksuits.
Until Boris tells us what to do again we'll continue to think for ourselves.
BrilliantListen. My friends and I live in an affluent and like minded area and we are doing everything we can to reduce the risk to others. Swapping spit, licking railings, lobbing phlegm into jars and pouring it into our 10 pint punch bowl at our daily coughing parties. My friends are an astronaut, a Geth Prime, Santa Claus and a sentient pair of loafers. I head a team of four hundred tadpoles who sell knock off Adibas tracksuits.
Until Boris tells us what to do again we'll continue to think for ourselves.
Yep. I think this pandemic will be harder to contain than most here seem to believe. Hundreds of thousands will die no matter what we do.TBF to him, he has also said that he was expecting 500k-1m deaths. Right @Dante ?
Which brings to what I have been saying all along. Mitigation/herd-immunity comes to a giant cost of number of lives. It might be the only option though, but soon we will realize if that is the case or not (China and South Korea).
Herd immunity without hundreds of thousands of lives lost is impossible. Unless it is done by a vaccine.
76 and never saved for a pension? Don't you have to provide a pension for anyone who works for you? Or does that not apply in the Sheffield Gulag?Got a guy that works for me who is 76 (never saved for a pension) and has a underlying heart condition. I'm terrified for him.
Jesus fecking Christ. Not the right time for anti-vaxxers.Bill Gates must be thrilled.. ?
‘The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care & reproductive health services, we could LOWER that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.
Ex vaccine researcher:
‘At the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system. I know that may be hard to accept, but its true. The medical cartel, at the highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them. To kill them. At one point in my career, I had a long conversation with a man who occupied a high government position in an African nation. He told me that he was well aware of this. He told me that WHO is a front for these depopulation interests’.
Im not endorsing any ‘conspiracy’ theory, especially in times like these, but one can objectively present statements from ‘wealthy’ influential ‘elites’ who have been advocating for a ‘less populated’ earth for decades.
Again, i am merely presenting a view, and quotes which are tracable to the people who said them.
That's definitely not the the position from which I've been arguing.
I have zero affiliation with this government. I'm a Green voter in most elections, with the occasional tactical vote for Labour or the Lib Dems. I've never voted Tory, and I think Boris is a cnut.
What I've been arguing for in this thread is a multi-faceted approach to this crisis, as best descibed by the multi-disciplinary board leading the strategy.
My argument tries to take into account lives lost in the short term, as well lives lost in the long term, the potential for civil unrest leading to rioting, quarantine and curfew management, people being able to keep their jobs so they can pay for food and rent and don't become homeless, keeping families above the poverty line, keeping the supply chain unbroken so that shops can be stocked with food, keeping order on the streets so that medical workers can get to hospitals, keeping the utilities running so that we all have water to drink, etc. etc.
The opposing view in this thread is to take a single-track approach which mainly takes into account lives lost in the short term, and hopes the knock on effects in the long-term are also positive.
I don't think the single-track view is ignoble in any way. I think most who argues for it is doing so from a well-meaning place. However, I do think it's misguided in terms of coming up with the best possible solution for keeping the highest number of citizens alive and safe after 18 months once the crisis is (hopefully) over.
I'm a pragmatist who's quite happy to change his mind based on changing information. If the multi-faceted approach and the single-track approach end up in agreement, then great. But it will be down to luck rather than judgement because a multi-faceted approach will always be closer to the ideal.
Terries - you generally used a nappy liner which caught most of the solid stuff and could be chucked or flushed away, then you sterilised them in a bucket with Napisan and hot-washed them at 60 degrees.
That's definitely not the the position from which I've been arguing.
I have zero affiliation with this government. I'm a Green voter in most elections, with the occasional tactical vote for Labour or the Lib Dems. I've never voted Tory, and I think Boris is a cnut.
What I've been arguing for in this thread is a multi-faceted approach to this crisis, as best descibed by the multi-disciplinary board leading the strategy.
My argument tries to take into account lives lost in the short term, as well lives lost in the long term, the potential for civil unrest leading to rioting, quarantine and curfew management, people being able to keep their jobs so they can pay for food and rent and don't become homeless, keeping families above the poverty line, keeping the supply chain unbroken so that shops can be stocked with food, keeping order on the streets so that medical workers can get to hospitals, keeping the utilities running so that we all have water to drink, etc. etc.
The opposing view in this thread is to take a single-track approach which mainly takes into account lives lost in the short term, and hopes the knock on effects in the long-term are also positive.
I don't think the single-track view is ignoble in any way. I think most who argues for it is doing so from a well-meaning place. However, I do think it's misguided in terms of coming up with the best possible solution for keeping the highest number of citizens alive and safe after 18 months once the crisis is (hopefully) over.
I'm a pragmatist who's quite happy to change his mind based on changing information. If the multi-faceted approach and the single-track approach end up in agreement, then great. But it will be down to luck rather than judgement because a multi-faceted approach will always be closer to the ideal.
Bill Gates must be thrilled.. ?
‘The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care & reproductive health services, we could LOWER that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.
Ex vaccine researcher:
‘At the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system. I know that may be hard to accept, but its true. The medical cartel, at the highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them. To kill them. At one point in my career, I had a long conversation with a man who occupied a high government position in an African nation. He told me that he was well aware of this. He told me that WHO is a front for these depopulation interests’.
Im not endorsing any ‘conspiracy’ theory, especially in times like these, but one can objectively present statements from ‘wealthy’ influential ‘elites’ who have been advocating for a ‘less populated’ earth for decades.
Again, i am merely presenting a view, and quotes which are tracable to the people who said them.
Imma just presenting my view, which is not a conspiracy theory, but Bill Gates wants to kill a billion people.Bill Gates must be thrilled.. ?
‘The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care & reproductive health services, we could LOWER that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.
Ex vaccine researcher:
‘At the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system. I know that may be hard to accept, but its true. The medical cartel, at the highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them. To kill them. At one point in my career, I had a long conversation with a man who occupied a high government position in an African nation. He told me that he was well aware of this. He told me that WHO is a front for these depopulation interests’.
Im not endorsing any ‘conspiracy’ theory, especially in times like these, but one can objectively present statements from ‘wealthy’ influential ‘elites’ who have been advocating for a ‘less populated’ earth for decades.
Again, i am merely presenting a view, and quotes which are tracable to the people who said them.
And the Swedish.
That said, I don’t think the bottom line has changed here. The report states that the consensus route still has a massive then what(?!) at the end of it and could end up worse. I think the UK’s plan was too utilitarian and those ideas just don’t float anymore. The political gamble of going against the consensus was just too great with the stakes at play.
"To achieve herd immunity, roughly 50-60% of the population would need to get infected".
So the reverse of this?I love this comment on the worldnews sub. Sometimes the stereotype is actually funny.
>I think it's hilarious that I can only remember seeing Ireland in the news twice in my recent memory.
>3/15/2020 - Pubs in Ireland asked to close due to Coronavirus.
>3/16/2020 - Irish developed testing kit to confirm Coronavirus in 15 minutes.
Wait, don't they have chocolate on them? That's toxic to dogs!
76 and never saved for a pension? Don't you have to provide a pension for anyone who works for you? Or does that not apply in the Sheffield Gulag?
That's definitely not the the position from which I've been arguing.
I have zero affiliation with this government. I'm a Green voter in most elections, with the occasional tactical vote for Labour or the Lib Dems. I've never voted Tory, and I think Boris is a cnut.
What I've been arguing for in this thread is a multi-faceted approach to this crisis, as best descibed by the multi-disciplinary board leading the strategy.
My argument tries to take into account lives lost in the short term, as well lives lost in the long term, the potential for civil unrest leading to rioting, quarantine and curfew management, people being able to keep their jobs so they can pay for food and rent and don't become homeless, keeping families above the poverty line, keeping the supply chain unbroken so that shops can be stocked with food, keeping order on the streets so that medical workers can get to hospitals, keeping the utilities running so that we all have water to drink, etc. etc.
The opposing view in this thread is to take a single-track approach which mainly takes into account lives lost in the short term, and hopes the knock on effects in the long-term are also positive.
I don't think the single-track view is ignoble in any way. I think most who argues for it is doing so from a well-meaning place. However, I do think it's misguided in terms of coming up with the best possible solution for keeping the highest number of citizens alive and safe after 18 months once the crisis is (hopefully) over.
I'm a pragmatist who's quite happy to change his mind based on changing information. If the multi-faceted approach and the single-track approach end up in agreement, then great. But it will be down to luck rather than judgement because a multi-faceted approach will always be closer to the ideal.
I'm still quite stunned by this.
It's one thing to feck up your predictions. That can happen, even if it's to horrendous effect in this case.
But to wilfully deviate from what other countries are doing and the WHO are imploring, only to so quickly (but not quickly enough) realise it was a horrendous mistake?
The sheer fecking arrogance of thinking they knew better than everyone else. Jesus.
They don't speak to the people on the fecking NHS floor. They make arbitrary statements from their ivory tower.To be quite honest I don't fault them too much.
The government are doing the right thing by listening to their own experts, who know the situation in their own country better than anybody in the WHO (who are a total waste of space) or anywhere else. It's how good government is supposed to work.
How those experts managed to feck it up is another question, but again the government is doing the right thing by admitting the mistake and changing course.
It's far better than a certain idiot leader who refuses to listen to those who know better and would never in a million years admit he was wrong.